1.Relations Among Coronary Flow Reserve, Left Ventricular Mass and Diastolic Function in Patients with Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Angiograms.
Hojun RHEE ; Do Sun LIM ; Hong Euy LIM ; Sung Hee SHIN ; Young Jae OH ; Gyo Seung HWANG ; Young Hoon KIM ; Hong Seog SEO ; Wan Joo SHIM ; Dong Joo OH ; Young Moo RO
Korean Circulation Journal 2000;30(3):287-294
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a well known cardiovascular risk factor, independent of hypertension, even in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease. Possible mechanisms have been proposed, including increased LV mass, reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR) and diastolic filling abnormalities. However, the relations among LV hypertrophy, diastolic function, hypertension and coronary flow reserve (CFR) in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms have not been well defined. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Twenty-six patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms were included. LV mass, isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), deceleration time (DT) and E/A ratio were assessed by 2-D echo-cardiography. Coronary blood flow velocity before and after intracoronary adenosine were measured using intracoronary Doppler wire (FIoWire). CFR was defined as ratio of peak flow velocity after adenosine to baseline flow velocity. Subjects were devided into 4 groups according to presence of LVH and hypertension and the parameters were compared among groups. RESULTS: FR was lower (p<0.01) in the groups with either hypertension or LVH or both than in the groups without them. The decrement in CFR was not linearly related to the degree of LVH (r=0.31, p=0.135). Although there were modest increment in IVRT and DT and decrement in E/A ratio in the groups with hypertension or LVH or both, there was no statistical significance. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the underlying mechanism of impaired CFR in patients with LVH or hypertension may be the consequence of primary coronary microvascular lesion rather than the process of left ventricular hypertrophy.
Adenosine
;
Blood Flow Velocity
;
Chest Pain*
;
Coronary Artery Disease
;
Deceleration
;
Humans
;
Hypertension
;
Hypertrophy
;
Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular
;
Relaxation
;
Risk Factors
;
Thorax*
2.Electrophysiologic Characteristics in the Process of Conversion from Atrial Fibrillation to Atrial Flutter.
Sung Hee SHIN ; Young Hoon KIM ; Hyun Soo LEE ; Gyo Seung HWANG ; Byung Soo KIM ; Hojun RHEE ; Jin Won KIM ; Do Sun LIM ; Hong Seog SEO ; Man Ho LEE ; Wan Joo SHIM ; Dong Joo OH ; Young Moo RO
Korean Circulation Journal 2000;30(1):72-81
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has long been recognized as a random phenomenon. Recent studies, however, suggest that activation sequence during atrial fibrillation is not entirely disorganized and organized activations as the transitional rhythm exists in the process of conversion from atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter. The purpose of this study is to characterize the process and significance of transitional rhythm during conversion of atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 9 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, 13 episodes that atrial fibrillation spontaneously converted to atrial flutter during electrophysiological study were analyzed. To map the right atrium (RA), 10 bipolar Halo catheter was positioned in the lateral free wall of the RA and multielectrode catheters were positioned in the coronary sinus, high RA, and His bundle area, respectively. Calculation of cycle length (CL) was performed with digital caliper during atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Direction of activation sequences was compared between transitional rhythm and following atrial flutter. RESULTS: During conversion of atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter, characteristic findings were observed as follows. 1) There was a gradual increase in atrial fibrillation cycle length before transitional rhythm. 2) A pause appeared in atrial fibrillation immediately prior to transitional rhythm, and between transitional rhythm and following atrial flutter. 3) Direction of activation sequences of the transitional rhythm to atrial flutter was concordant in 9 episodes and discordant in 4 episodes. 4) Spontaneous termination of atrial flutter (n=3) was also preceded by organized rhythm showing different sequence of activations from those of atrial flutter. CONCLUSION: A stereotypical pattern of activation sequence exists in the process of conversion of atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter. The occurrence of transitional rhythm influences the activation sequence of atrial flutter. Spontaneous termination of atrial flutter also preceded by transiently changing pattern of activation.
Atrial Fibrillation*
;
Atrial Flutter*
;
Bundle of His
;
Catheters
;
Coronary Sinus
;
Heart Atria
;
Humans
3.Significance of Atrio-Ventricular Block Following Atrio-His Jump in the Diagnosis of Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Physiology with Adenosine Infusion.
Seung Hwan HAN ; Young Hoon KIM ; Hyun Soo LEE ; Hojun RHEE ; Sung Hee SHIN ; Chang Gyu PARK ; Hong Seog SEO ; Wan Joo SHIM ; Dong Joo OH ; Young Moo RO ; Gyo Seung HWANG
Korean Circulation Journal 2002;32(3):241-250
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Atrioventricular block (AVB) is frequently seen following atrio-His (AH) interval lengthening after adenosine injection during sinus rhythm when both the fast and slow pathways are blocked in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal physiology (DAVNP). However, the condition also occurs in patients without DAVNP. Therefore, an AH jump may not indicate DAVNP if AVB is accompanied. The goal of this study was to use a low dose (6-9 mg) of adenosine to determine whether an AH jump truly represents DAVNP when the presence or absence of AVB following the AH jump is taken into consideration. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study included 78 patients (male:female=47:31, age 40.0+/-15.7 years, DAVNP group, n=46, control group, n=32). Adenosine (6-9 mg) was administered intravenously during sinus rhythm. The inclusion criteria of DAVNP were either induced AVNRT (n=37:common type, n=35, uncommon, n=2) or identification of AH jump (n=9) during elctrophysiology study (EPS). The control group consisted of patients without evidence of DAVNP and noninducible AVNRT on EPS. In all subjects, the electrophysiologic parameters of the AV nodal properties were tested. In the DAVNP group, intravenous adenosine during sinus rhythm resulted in an AH jump without AVB (8/46, 17.4%), an AH jump followed by AVB (9/46, 19.6%), an AH jump accompanied by induced AVNRT (1/46, 2.1%), or no significant changes in the AH interval (28/46, 60.9%). In the control group, none of the subjects showed an AH jump without AVB, however an AH jump with subsequent AVB was observed in 4 of 32 subjects (12.5%). If the finding of an AH jump without AVB alone was considered as a positive criteria of DAVNP, its specificity (87.5% to 100%) and positive predictive value (81.8% to 100%) increased compared to the criteria defined by an AH jump regardless of the presence or absence of AVB, however, its sensitivity decreased from 39.1% to 19.6%. CONCLUSION: AH jump induced by adenosine injection may not indicate DAVNP if AVB follows.
Adenosine*
;
Atrioventricular Block
;
Diagnosis*
;
Heart Block
;
Humans
;
Physiology*
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry