1.Preparing Brochure on Inguinal Hernia Surgery
Mayumi YOKOKURA ; Asami BABA ; Hitomi USHIODA ; Tomoko KAWANO ; Fumiyo KIMIZAKI ; Tetsuo HORI
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2015;63(6):995-999
It was February 2007 that the pediatric surgery department was established in our hospital. Since then, the number of surgical cases of inguinal hernia has been increasing year after year. During 2013, a total of 48 patients underwent hernia surgery. Operations were performed mostly on the day the patients were hospitalized. Before the surgery, the patients and their relatives were told about the nature of the disease and treatment by word of mouth. Actually, however, we were to busy to take much time to talk with them. After surgery, members of patients’ families, being all anxiety, frequently asked us such questions as: - how soon will the patient be allowed to have a cup of tea or juice?; when can the patient do without the IV drip?; and how should the family take care of the patient at home? We presumed that the anxiety might stem from the inadequate explanation given orally by inexperienced nurses. To improve the situation, we, staffers in charge of pediatric inpatient care, and physicians in the outpatient clinic of the pediatric surgery department teamed up to prepare a pamphlet including a list of standardized answers to supposedly most frequently asked questions in the hospitalization setting. The draft of the pamphlet was shown to ward nurses to sound out their opinion on the contents. Based on the results of this survey, the pamphlet was completed. This paper deals with the pamphlet and a summary of nurses’s views on it.
2.Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection and Cutaneous Sarcoidal Granulomas.
Naotaka SERIZAWA ; Yoko FUNASAKA ; Hitomi GOTO ; Akiko KANZAKI ; Junko HORI ; Yasuko TAKANO ; Hidehisa SAEKI
Annals of Dermatology 2017;29(2):239-241
No abstract available.
Granuloma*
;
Platelet-Rich Plasma*
3.Improved visibility of palisade vessels within Barrett’s esophagus using red dichromatic imaging: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Japan
Chise UEDA ; Shinwa TANAKA ; Tetsuya YOSHIZAKI ; Hirofumi ABE ; Masato KINOSHITA ; Hiroya SAKAGUCHI ; Hiroshi TAKAYAMA ; Hitomi HORI ; Ryosuke ISHIDA ; Shinya HOUKI ; Hiroshi TANABE ; Eri NISHIKAWA ; Madoka TAKAO ; Toshitatsu TAKAO ; Yoshinori MORITA ; Takashi TOYONAGA ; Yuzo KODAMA
Clinical Endoscopy 2025;58(2):269-277
Background/Aims:
Visualization of palisade vessels (PVs) in Barrett’s esophagus is crucial for proper assessment. This study aimed to determine whether red dichromatic imaging (RDI) improves PV visibility compared with white-light imaging (WLI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI).
Methods:
Five expert and trainee endoscopists evaluated the PV visibility in Barrett’s esophagus using WLI, NBI, and RDI on 66 images from 22 patients. Visibility was rated on a 4-point scale: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; and 1, poor. The color difference between the most recognizable PV spots and surrounding areas with undetectable blood vessels was also analyzed.
Results:
Mean visibility scores were 2.6±0.7, 2.3±0.6, and 3.4±0.4 for WLI, NBI, and RDI, respectively. The RDI scores were significantly higher than the WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p<0.001) scores. These differences were recognized by trainees and expert endoscopists. Color differences in PVs were 7.74±4.96 (WLI), 10.43±5.09 (NBI), and 15.1±6.54 (RDI). The difference in RDI was significantly higher than that in WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p=0.006).
Conclusions
RDI significantly improved PV visibility compared to WLI and NBI based on objective and subjective measures.
4.Improved visibility of palisade vessels within Barrett’s esophagus using red dichromatic imaging: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Japan
Chise UEDA ; Shinwa TANAKA ; Tetsuya YOSHIZAKI ; Hirofumi ABE ; Masato KINOSHITA ; Hiroya SAKAGUCHI ; Hiroshi TAKAYAMA ; Hitomi HORI ; Ryosuke ISHIDA ; Shinya HOUKI ; Hiroshi TANABE ; Eri NISHIKAWA ; Madoka TAKAO ; Toshitatsu TAKAO ; Yoshinori MORITA ; Takashi TOYONAGA ; Yuzo KODAMA
Clinical Endoscopy 2025;58(2):269-277
Background/Aims:
Visualization of palisade vessels (PVs) in Barrett’s esophagus is crucial for proper assessment. This study aimed to determine whether red dichromatic imaging (RDI) improves PV visibility compared with white-light imaging (WLI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI).
Methods:
Five expert and trainee endoscopists evaluated the PV visibility in Barrett’s esophagus using WLI, NBI, and RDI on 66 images from 22 patients. Visibility was rated on a 4-point scale: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; and 1, poor. The color difference between the most recognizable PV spots and surrounding areas with undetectable blood vessels was also analyzed.
Results:
Mean visibility scores were 2.6±0.7, 2.3±0.6, and 3.4±0.4 for WLI, NBI, and RDI, respectively. The RDI scores were significantly higher than the WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p<0.001) scores. These differences were recognized by trainees and expert endoscopists. Color differences in PVs were 7.74±4.96 (WLI), 10.43±5.09 (NBI), and 15.1±6.54 (RDI). The difference in RDI was significantly higher than that in WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p=0.006).
Conclusions
RDI significantly improved PV visibility compared to WLI and NBI based on objective and subjective measures.
5.Improved visibility of palisade vessels within Barrett’s esophagus using red dichromatic imaging: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Japan
Chise UEDA ; Shinwa TANAKA ; Tetsuya YOSHIZAKI ; Hirofumi ABE ; Masato KINOSHITA ; Hiroya SAKAGUCHI ; Hiroshi TAKAYAMA ; Hitomi HORI ; Ryosuke ISHIDA ; Shinya HOUKI ; Hiroshi TANABE ; Eri NISHIKAWA ; Madoka TAKAO ; Toshitatsu TAKAO ; Yoshinori MORITA ; Takashi TOYONAGA ; Yuzo KODAMA
Clinical Endoscopy 2025;58(2):269-277
Background/Aims:
Visualization of palisade vessels (PVs) in Barrett’s esophagus is crucial for proper assessment. This study aimed to determine whether red dichromatic imaging (RDI) improves PV visibility compared with white-light imaging (WLI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI).
Methods:
Five expert and trainee endoscopists evaluated the PV visibility in Barrett’s esophagus using WLI, NBI, and RDI on 66 images from 22 patients. Visibility was rated on a 4-point scale: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; and 1, poor. The color difference between the most recognizable PV spots and surrounding areas with undetectable blood vessels was also analyzed.
Results:
Mean visibility scores were 2.6±0.7, 2.3±0.6, and 3.4±0.4 for WLI, NBI, and RDI, respectively. The RDI scores were significantly higher than the WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p<0.001) scores. These differences were recognized by trainees and expert endoscopists. Color differences in PVs were 7.74±4.96 (WLI), 10.43±5.09 (NBI), and 15.1±6.54 (RDI). The difference in RDI was significantly higher than that in WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p=0.006).
Conclusions
RDI significantly improved PV visibility compared to WLI and NBI based on objective and subjective measures.