A typical feature of mid-ventricular obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (MVO-HCM), is obvious hypertrophy of the mid-ventricular muscle and ventricle with transformation into the shape of an hourglass. We report a 60-year-old woman who had been given a diagnosis of apical type hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 12 years previously, but it changed to MVO-HCM with apical left ventricular aneurysm. We considered the impending rupture of the aneurysm because its wall was thin and pericardial effusion was detected by UCG (ultrasonic cardiograph). Urgent surgery was performed consisting of ventricular aneurysmectomy and patch reconstruction. After the surgery, a pseudoaneurysm was found in cardiac apex, so we performed surgery again. A residual shunt in the trabeculation caused the pseudoaneurysm, but its origin was not clear. She has been fine for 18 months without complications such as recurrence of aneurysm, ventricular arrhythmia or left ventricular dysfunction since the last surgery.

A 64-year-old man was found to have a nodule in his right lung. He also complained of nausea and abdominal pain during the clinical course. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a duodenal ulcer associated with severe stenosis and a suspicion of malignancy. However, three subsequent biopsies revealed no evidence of malignancy. The fourth biopsy showed scattered large eosinophilic cells with an eccentric nucleus, leading to a diagnosis of Russell body duodenitis (RBD). RBD is an extremely rare disease, and little is known about its etiology and clinical course. The pathogenesis of RBD is discussed based on our experience with this case.
Abdominal Pain ; Biopsy ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Diagnosis ; Duodenal Ulcer ; Duodenitis* ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Eosinophils ; Humans ; Lung ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; Rare Diseases

Students' interviewing skills are now commonly evaluated with standardized patient-based assessment methods. Four pairs of instructors at Nihon University School of Medicine used objective structured clinical examinations to evaluate the medical interviewing skills of 122 fifth-year medical students. The results were then analyzed to improve the accuracy of rating with objective structured clinical examinations. Interrater variability was significant among the two pairs of instructors. Variability was greatest when instructors evaluated a student's performance but was minimal when they judged whether a student had carried out a task. The number of standardized patients was 8, with the average score of each standardized patient ranging from 52.5 to 73.3 (full score, 100). These results suggest that the rating process for each item should be further refined and that the standard for evaluation should be clarified.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to propose a set of quality indicators (QIs) based on the clinical guidelines for cervical cancer treatment published by The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and to assess adherence to standard-of-care as an index of the quality of care for cervical cancer in Japan. METHODS: A panel of clinical experts devised the QIs using a modified Delphi method. Adherence to each QI was evaluated using data from a hospital-based cancer registry of patients diagnosed in 2013, and linked with insurance claims data, between October 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014. All patients who received first-line treatment at the participating facility were included. The QI scores were communicated to participating hospitals, and additional data about the reasons for non-adherence were collected. RESULTS: In total, 297 hospitals participated, and the care provided to 15,163 cervical cancer patients was examined using 10 measurable QIs. The adherence rate ranged from 50.0% for ‘cystoscope or proctoscope for stage IVA’ to 98.8% for ‘chemotherapy using platinum for stage IVB’. Despite the variation in care, hospitals reported clinically valid reasons for more than half of the non-adherent cases. Clinically valid reasons accounted for 75%, 90.9%, 73.4%, 44.5%, and 88.1% of presented non-adherent cases respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed variations in pattern of care as well as an adherence to standards-of-care across Japan. Further assessment of the causes of variation and non-adherence can help identify areas where improvements are needed in patient care.
Guideline Adherence ; Humans ; Insurance ; Japan* ; Methods ; Patient Care ; Platinum ; Proctoscopes ; Qi ; Standard of Care ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*