The number of physicians in Japan has been and will continue to be lower than that in other the Organization for Economic Co-operative and Development (OECD) countries. The admission capacity of medical schools, which has the greatest impact on the number of physicians, has been determined through discussions among the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, medical associations, medical organizations, universities, and academics, depending on the medical supply-demand status on that era. In recent years, the maldistribution of medical specialties and regions has become an issue. For the involving this issue, Japanese government takes from multiple perspectives to address this problem, including “regional quotas” in admission quotas for university medical school and, setting a ceiling on the number of residency positions available in each prefecture as well as on recruitment capacity in the specialist physician system. The implementation of “work style reform” for physicians, focuses on shortening physicians’ working hours and has raised concerns regarding a shortage and regional maldistribution of physicians. The government’s policy is based on a key concern: rising healthcare costs could seriously threaten the country’s financial health. Therefore, the government has limited the increase in the number of physicians. Conversely, this year, the government has begun to argue that a regulatory approach is necessary to address the uneven distribution of physicians. Our proposition is to achieve a number of physicians comparable to that of other OECD countries and to create an environment that enables physicians to voluntarily address their regional and departmental maldistribution.

The number of physicians in Japan has been and will continue to be lower than that in other the Organization for Economic Co-operative and Development (OECD) countries. The admission capacity of medical schools, which has the greatest impact on the number of physicians, has been determined through discussions among the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, medical associations, medical organizations, universities, and academics, depending on the medical supply-demand status on that era. In recent years, the maldistribution of medical specialties and regions has become an issue. For the involving this issue, Japanese government takes from multiple perspectives to address this problem, including “regional quotas” in admission quotas for university medical school and, setting a ceiling on the number of residency positions available in each prefecture as well as on recruitment capacity in the specialist physician system. The implementation of “work style reform” for physicians, focuses on shortening physicians’ working hours and has raised concerns regarding a shortage and regional maldistribution of physicians. The government’s policy is based on a key concern: rising healthcare costs could seriously threaten the country’s financial health. Therefore, the government has limited the increase in the number of physicians. Conversely, this year, the government has begun to argue that a regulatory approach is necessary to address the uneven distribution of physicians. Our proposition is to achieve a number of physicians comparable to that of other OECD countries and to create an environment that enables physicians to voluntarily address their regional and departmental maldistribution.

The number of physicians in Japan has been and will continue to be lower than that in other the Organization for Economic Co-operative and Development (OECD) countries. The admission capacity of medical schools, which has the greatest impact on the number of physicians, has been determined through discussions among the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, medical associations, medical organizations, universities, and academics, depending on the medical supply-demand status on that era. In recent years, the maldistribution of medical specialties and regions has become an issue. For the involving this issue, Japanese government takes from multiple perspectives to address this problem, including “regional quotas” in admission quotas for university medical school and, setting a ceiling on the number of residency positions available in each prefecture as well as on recruitment capacity in the specialist physician system. The implementation of “work style reform” for physicians, focuses on shortening physicians’ working hours and has raised concerns regarding a shortage and regional maldistribution of physicians. The government’s policy is based on a key concern: rising healthcare costs could seriously threaten the country’s financial health. Therefore, the government has limited the increase in the number of physicians. Conversely, this year, the government has begun to argue that a regulatory approach is necessary to address the uneven distribution of physicians. Our proposition is to achieve a number of physicians comparable to that of other OECD countries and to create an environment that enables physicians to voluntarily address their regional and departmental maldistribution.

The number of physicians in Japan has been and will continue to be lower than that in other the Organization for Economic Co-operative and Development (OECD) countries. The admission capacity of medical schools, which has the greatest impact on the number of physicians, has been determined through discussions among the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, medical associations, medical organizations, universities, and academics, depending on the medical supply-demand status on that era. In recent years, the maldistribution of medical specialties and regions has become an issue. For the involving this issue, Japanese government takes from multiple perspectives to address this problem, including “regional quotas” in admission quotas for university medical school and, setting a ceiling on the number of residency positions available in each prefecture as well as on recruitment capacity in the specialist physician system. The implementation of “work style reform” for physicians, focuses on shortening physicians’ working hours and has raised concerns regarding a shortage and regional maldistribution of physicians. The government’s policy is based on a key concern: rising healthcare costs could seriously threaten the country’s financial health. Therefore, the government has limited the increase in the number of physicians. Conversely, this year, the government has begun to argue that a regulatory approach is necessary to address the uneven distribution of physicians. Our proposition is to achieve a number of physicians comparable to that of other OECD countries and to create an environment that enables physicians to voluntarily address their regional and departmental maldistribution.