Purpose: Stone extraction is an important treatment option when performing flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (f-URSL) for upper urinary stones. We used a f-URSL simulator model to investigate surgical factors affecting the efficacy of stone extraction with the one-surgeon basketing technique. Materials and Methods: This simulator-based study involved eight urologists and eight residents. These participants each performed two tasks, with Flexor (Cook Medical) and Navigator (Boston Scientific) ureteral access sheaths, with and without the M-arm (MC Medical) single-use basket holder, and with models representing both left and right kidneys. The two tasks were to touch each renal calix with the ureteroscope, and to extract stones. As outcomes, we recorded the number of times that the ureteroscope became stuck during insertion, the number of times a stone was dropped during removal, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and the time required to accomplish each task. Results: The ureteroscope became stuck significantly more often when Navigator was used compared with Flexor overall, and for both urologists and residents (all p<0.01). Stones were dropped significantly more often on the ipsilateral side (kidney on the same side as the operator’s hand) than on the contralateral side overall (p=0.01), and the basket forceps were opened and closed significantly more often on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side both overall and by residents (all p<0.01). Conclusions The efficiency of stone extraction during f-URSL with the one-surgeon basketing technique was affected by differences in ureteral access sheath and the kidney side.

Purpose: Stone extraction is an important treatment option when performing flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (f-URSL) for upper urinary stones. We used a f-URSL simulator model to investigate surgical factors affecting the efficacy of stone extraction with the one-surgeon basketing technique. Materials and Methods: This simulator-based study involved eight urologists and eight residents. These participants each performed two tasks, with Flexor (Cook Medical) and Navigator (Boston Scientific) ureteral access sheaths, with and without the M-arm (MC Medical) single-use basket holder, and with models representing both left and right kidneys. The two tasks were to touch each renal calix with the ureteroscope, and to extract stones. As outcomes, we recorded the number of times that the ureteroscope became stuck during insertion, the number of times a stone was dropped during removal, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and the time required to accomplish each task. Results: The ureteroscope became stuck significantly more often when Navigator was used compared with Flexor overall, and for both urologists and residents (all p<0.01). Stones were dropped significantly more often on the ipsilateral side (kidney on the same side as the operator’s hand) than on the contralateral side overall (p=0.01), and the basket forceps were opened and closed significantly more often on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side both overall and by residents (all p<0.01). Conclusions The efficiency of stone extraction during f-URSL with the one-surgeon basketing technique was affected by differences in ureteral access sheath and the kidney side.

Purpose: Stone extraction is an important treatment option when performing flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (f-URSL) for upper urinary stones. We used a f-URSL simulator model to investigate surgical factors affecting the efficacy of stone extraction with the one-surgeon basketing technique. Materials and Methods: This simulator-based study involved eight urologists and eight residents. These participants each performed two tasks, with Flexor (Cook Medical) and Navigator (Boston Scientific) ureteral access sheaths, with and without the M-arm (MC Medical) single-use basket holder, and with models representing both left and right kidneys. The two tasks were to touch each renal calix with the ureteroscope, and to extract stones. As outcomes, we recorded the number of times that the ureteroscope became stuck during insertion, the number of times a stone was dropped during removal, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and the time required to accomplish each task. Results: The ureteroscope became stuck significantly more often when Navigator was used compared with Flexor overall, and for both urologists and residents (all p<0.01). Stones were dropped significantly more often on the ipsilateral side (kidney on the same side as the operator’s hand) than on the contralateral side overall (p=0.01), and the basket forceps were opened and closed significantly more often on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side both overall and by residents (all p<0.01). Conclusions The efficiency of stone extraction during f-URSL with the one-surgeon basketing technique was affected by differences in ureteral access sheath and the kidney side.

Purpose: Stone extraction is an important treatment option when performing flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (f-URSL) for upper urinary stones. We used a f-URSL simulator model to investigate surgical factors affecting the efficacy of stone extraction with the one-surgeon basketing technique. Materials and Methods: This simulator-based study involved eight urologists and eight residents. These participants each performed two tasks, with Flexor (Cook Medical) and Navigator (Boston Scientific) ureteral access sheaths, with and without the M-arm (MC Medical) single-use basket holder, and with models representing both left and right kidneys. The two tasks were to touch each renal calix with the ureteroscope, and to extract stones. As outcomes, we recorded the number of times that the ureteroscope became stuck during insertion, the number of times a stone was dropped during removal, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and the time required to accomplish each task. Results: The ureteroscope became stuck significantly more often when Navigator was used compared with Flexor overall, and for both urologists and residents (all p<0.01). Stones were dropped significantly more often on the ipsilateral side (kidney on the same side as the operator’s hand) than on the contralateral side overall (p=0.01), and the basket forceps were opened and closed significantly more often on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side both overall and by residents (all p<0.01). Conclusions The efficiency of stone extraction during f-URSL with the one-surgeon basketing technique was affected by differences in ureteral access sheath and the kidney side.

OBJECTIVE: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a reasonable option for intractable depression or schizophrenia, but a mechanism of action has not been established. One credible hypothesis is related to neural plasticity. Three genes (Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc) involved in the induction of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are Wnt-target genes, which constitute a key gene group involved in neural plasticity through the TCF family. Klf4 is the other gene among Yamanaka's four transcription factors, and increases in its expression are induced by stimulation of the canonical Wnt pathway. METHODS: We compared the peripheral blood gene expression of the four iPS genes (Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4) before and after modified ECT (specifically ECT with general anesthesia) of patients with intractable depression (n=6) or schizophrenia (n=6). Using Thymatron ten times the total bilateral electrical stimulation was evoked. RESULTS: Both assessments of the symptoms demonstrated significant improvement after mECT stimulation. Expression of all four genes was confirmed to increase after initial stimulation. The gene expression levels after treatment were significantly different from the initial gene expression in all twelve cases at the following treatment stages: at the 3rd mECT for Oct4; at the 6th and 10th mECT for Sox2; and at the 3rd, 6th and 10th mECT for c-Myc. CONCLUSION: These significant differences were not present after correction for multiple testing; however, our data have the potential to explain the molecular mechanisms of mECT from a unique perspective. Further studie should be conducted to clarify the pathophysiological involvement of iPS-inducing genes in ECT.
Depression ; Electric Stimulation ; Electroconvulsive Therapy* ; Gene Expression* ; Humans ; Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells ; Plastics ; Schizophrenia ; Transcription Factors* ; Wnt Signaling Pathway