Background: In total hip arthroplasty, the cup setting angle may affect the postoperative results. In recent years, both computed tomography-based navigation and computed tomography-free (imageless) navigation have been reported to produce high accuracy in cup installation; however, no direct comparison between these two methods has been performed. The present study aimed to directly compare the cup installation angle accuracy between computed tomography-based navigation and computed tomographyfree navigation in patients with Crowe’s classification stage I or II dysplastic osteoarthritis and to examine the factors affecting the cup installation accuracy. Methods: Using both navigation systems for the same technique, primary total hip arthroplasty was performed by the same surgeon in 36 patients. A cup was installed using computed tomography-based navigation, and the installed cup was measured again using computed tomography-free navigation. We compared the error between the target angle and the intraoperative installation angle for each navigation method by performing statistical analyses. Results: For computed tomography-based navigation, errors in the inclination and the anteversion angles compared to the target angle were 3.14° ± 1.55° and 1.47° ± 0.99°, respectively. For computed tomography-free navigation, the inclination and anteversion angle errors were significantly larger, i.e., 6.84° ± 4.78° and 5.43° ± 5.22°, respectively (p < 0.01). The inclination and anteversion angles of computed tomography-free navigation were correlated, and there were no significant factors influencing the error. Conclusions Computed tomography-based navigation is more accurate for cup installation than computed tomography-free navigation. When using computed tomography-free navigation, it is necessary to add technical schemes before and during surgery to improve the cup installation accuracy.

Background: In total hip arthroplasty, the cup setting angle may affect the postoperative results. In recent years, both computed tomography-based navigation and computed tomography-free (imageless) navigation have been reported to produce high accuracy in cup installation; however, no direct comparison between these two methods has been performed. The present study aimed to directly compare the cup installation angle accuracy between computed tomography-based navigation and computed tomographyfree navigation in patients with Crowe’s classification stage I or II dysplastic osteoarthritis and to examine the factors affecting the cup installation accuracy. Methods: Using both navigation systems for the same technique, primary total hip arthroplasty was performed by the same surgeon in 36 patients. A cup was installed using computed tomography-based navigation, and the installed cup was measured again using computed tomography-free navigation. We compared the error between the target angle and the intraoperative installation angle for each navigation method by performing statistical analyses. Results: For computed tomography-based navigation, errors in the inclination and the anteversion angles compared to the target angle were 3.14° ± 1.55° and 1.47° ± 0.99°, respectively. For computed tomography-free navigation, the inclination and anteversion angle errors were significantly larger, i.e., 6.84° ± 4.78° and 5.43° ± 5.22°, respectively (p < 0.01). The inclination and anteversion angles of computed tomography-free navigation were correlated, and there were no significant factors influencing the error. Conclusions Computed tomography-based navigation is more accurate for cup installation than computed tomography-free navigation. When using computed tomography-free navigation, it is necessary to add technical schemes before and during surgery to improve the cup installation accuracy.

Background: There is a paucity of studies on the iliac curvature in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Here, we examined the iliac curvature in DDH using three-dimensional computed tomography. Methods: We allocated cases with a center-edge angle of < 20° to the DDH group (55 cases) and cases with a center-edge angle of > 25° to the control group (57 cases) and measured the straight line (line A) between the anterior and posterior superior iliac spines. We examined which part of the iliac bone line A passes through and classified the results into 4 categories (type A, inside the iliac bone; type B, through the iliac bone; type C, outside the iliac bone; and type D, both inside and outside the iliac bone) to evaluate the iliac wing curvature. After measuring the area and internal surface of the iliac wing using line A, we examined the correlation between these values, the interspinous distance, the superior iliac angle, and the center-edge angle. Results: Distributions of the four types were compared between the two groups; there was no significant difference. The length of the portion of line A inside the ilium and the area formed by line A and the iliac wing, which shows the degree of iliac wing curvature, were not significantly different between the groups. There were no correlations between these values and the center-edge angle; however, there were weak positive correlations among the interspinous distance, the superior iliac angle, and the centeredge angle. Conclusions The inward nature of the iliac bone in patients with DDH is mainly due to the internal rotation of the entire iliac bone and less likely due to the curvature of the iliac bone.

Background: Plain computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are useful for diagnosing adverse local tissue reactions after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA), but metal artifacts can hamper radiological assessments near the implants. We sought to clarify the usefulness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) CT and MRI in the periprosthetic region, which is difficult to assess after THA due to metal artifacts. Methods: We performed preoperative 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MRI, as well as plain CT and MRI, in 11 metal-on-metal THA patients who underwent revision surgery. Results: Most patients showed high FDG uptake in the metal artifact areas and pseudotumors in the 18-F-FDG-PET/CT and 18-FFDG-PET/MRI scans. Intraoperative intra-articular macroscopic and histopathological intra-articular granulation tissue findings were suggestive of adverse local tissue reaction. Conclusions The enhanced uptake in the metal artifact areas seemed to reflect adverse local tissue reaction. Therefore, 18F-FDGPET/CT and 18-F-FDG-PET/MRI can be useful for the auxiliary diagnosis of adverse local tissue reactions after metal-on-metal THA.

Background: Plain computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are useful for diagnosing adverse local tissue reactions after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA), but metal artifacts can hamper radiological assessments near the implants. We sought to clarify the usefulness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) CT and MRI in the periprosthetic region, which is difficult to assess after THA due to metal artifacts. Methods: We performed preoperative 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MRI, as well as plain CT and MRI, in 11 metal-on-metal THA patients who underwent revision surgery. Results: Most patients showed high FDG uptake in the metal artifact areas and pseudotumors in the 18-F-FDG-PET/CT and 18-FFDG-PET/MRI scans. Intraoperative intra-articular macroscopic and histopathological intra-articular granulation tissue findings were suggestive of adverse local tissue reaction. Conclusions The enhanced uptake in the metal artifact areas seemed to reflect adverse local tissue reaction. Therefore, 18F-FDGPET/CT and 18-F-FDG-PET/MRI can be useful for the auxiliary diagnosis of adverse local tissue reactions after metal-on-metal THA.

Background: No study has compared flat and elevated-rim polyethylene liners in terms of stress distribution on the bearing surface. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in stress distribution between flat and elevated-rim polyethylene liners. Methods: A stress analysis was performed by using the 3-dimensional finite element method. The cup was placed at an open angle of 20°, the flat liner and the liner with a 10° elevation was placed at inclination angles of 80°, 70°, and 60°. Results: Compared with the 60° flat liner, the 80° and 70° flat liners showed higher stress at the liner edge. In the elevated-rim liner, the stress was high at the liner edge along the cup edge. When the von Mises equivalent stress was applied to each element of the liner, the high stress area (volume) was the largest for the 80° flat liner, second largest for the 80° elevated-rim liner, and third largest for the 70° flat liner. The average contact pressure also followed the same order. Conclusions Elevated-rim liners affect the stress distribution by increasing the area of contact. However, since elevated-rim liners exhibit high stress at the cup edge, they are likely to result in new problems including liner failure. These findings could aid surgeons in the selection of liners and determination of revision methods such as isolated liner exchange vs. acetabular cup revision for a well-fixed metal cup with a higher inclination angle in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Disorders involving artificial joints are difficult to evaluate due to metal artifacts hindering plain computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the current case study 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET)/CT and MRI were used to confirm iliopsoas tendonitis within the metal artifact area following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The patient was a 61-year-old woman who developed hip pain on flexion of the ipsilateral hip after THA. Imaging studies were performed to evaluate for iliopsoas tendonitis due to impingement with the cup. Assessment of the iliopsoas muscle near the artificial joint was difficult due to the metal artifact on plain CT and MRI. Imaging using 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDGPET/MRI showed uptake along the iliopsoas muscle. Therefore, revision was performed to resolve iliopsoas tendon impingement, and the preoperative pain resolved. The result of the current case study suggest 18F-FDGPET/CT or 18F-FDG-PET/MRI will be useful to detect iliopsoas tendonitis within metal artifact areas after THA.

Background: Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are known to have abnormal pelvic morphologies; however, rotation of innominate bone features remains unclear. Thus, we investigated innominate bone rotation in patients with DDH by measuring the associated angles and distances using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography. Methods: We defined four straight lines in pelvic 3D models: from the anterior superior iliac spine to the posterior superior iliac spine, from the anterior inferior iliac spine to the posterior inferior iliac spine, from the pubic tubercle to the ischial spine, and from the pubic tubercle to the ischial tuberosity. Similarly, we measured the angles formed by these lines using the vertical axis of the anterior pelvic plane on the horizontal plane and the horizontal axis on the sagittal plane. Additionally, we measured the distances between the femoral head centers and the acetabular centers in the coronal plane. Results: The difference in internal rotation angle between the superior and inferior parts of the iliac bone was significantly lower, by approximately 1.7°, in the DDH group than in the control group (p = 0.007); the difference between the inferior and superior parts of the ischiopubic bone was significantly higher, by approximately 1.5°, in the DDH group (p< 0.001). In the sagittal plane, the sum of the superior aspect of the iliac bone and the inferior aspect of the ischium was significantly lower in the DDH group (p = 0.001) than in the control group. The distances between the femoral heads and the acetabula were significantly greater in the DDH group than in the control group (p = 0.03, p < 0.01, respectively). Conclusions Patients with DDH had a more internally rotated ilium and ischiopubic bone than normal individuals; however, it should be emphasized that internal rotation was reduced near the acetabulum, and the acetabulum was shifted laterally. Similarly, it was shown that patients with DDH had different rotations of the ilium and ischiopubic bone in the sagittal plane.