1.Calcar Preservation Arthroplasty for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures in Elderly.
Mustafa CELIKTAS ; Emre TOGRUL ; Ozkan KOSE
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2015;7(4):436-442
BACKGROUND: The treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to present treatment strategies for unstable intertrochanteric fractures with hemiarthroplasty using standard uncemented collared femoral stems and at the same time preserving the fractured calcar fragment. METHODS: Fifty-four patients aged 75 years or older with unstable intertrochanteric fractures were included in this prospective cohort study. All patients were treated with calcar preserving hemiarthroplasty using cementless collored femoral stems. Fractured calcar fragment was stabilized either by compaction between the implant and femur or fixed with cable grip system. Follow-up evaluations were performed at least 24 months and later. Palmer and Parker mobility score and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score were assessed. We also analyzed radiographs of the operated hip at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: The patients were 15 males and 39 females with a mean age of 81.3 years (range, 75 to 93 years). The average operative time was 86.6 minutes. The mean transfused blood units were 1.2 units. The average duration of hospital stay was 5.3 days. The preoperative mean mobility score was 6.20. This score was found to be 4.96 on postoperative third day and 5.90 at 24 months postoperatively. The results of the statistical analysis revealed significant increase in the mobility scores at each follow-up after three days. Radiological interpretation revealed no loosening in the cable-grip systems, and no significant subsidence (> 5 mm) of prosthesis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Calcar preservation arthroplasty is a good option for elderly patients with severe osteoporosis, frail constitution and the patients who are at higher risk for second operation due to unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects/*methods
;
Female
;
Femur/pathology/radiography/surgery
;
Hemiarthroplasty/adverse effects/*methods
;
Hip/pathology/radiography/surgery
;
Hip Fractures/physiopathology/radiography/*surgery
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Pain Measurement
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Prospective Studies
2.Usefulness of Arthroscopic Treatment of Painful Hip after Acetabular Fracture or Hip Dislocation.
Jung Taek HWANG ; Woo Yong LEE ; Chan KANG ; Deuk Soo HWANG ; Dong Yeol KIM ; Long ZHENG
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2015;7(4):443-448
BACKGROUND: Painful hip following hip dislocation or acetabular fracture can be an important signal for early degeneration and progression to osteoarthritis due to intraarticular pathology. However, there is limited literature discussing the use of arthroscopy for the treatment of painful hip. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze the effectiveness and benefit of arthroscopic treatment for patients with a painful hip after major trauma. METHODS: From July 2003 to February 2013, we reviewed 13 patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment after acetabular fracture or hip dislocation and were followed up for a minimum of 2 postoperative years. The degree of osteoarthritis based on the Tonnis classification pre- and postoperatively at final follow-up was determined. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) and modified Harris hip score (MHHS), and range of motion (ROM) of the hip pre- and postoperatively at final follow-up. RESULTS: There were nine male and four female patients with a mean age at surgery of 28 years (range, 20 to 50 years). The mean follow-up period of the patients was 59.8 months (range, 24 to 115 months), and the mean interval between initial trauma and arthroscopic treatment was 40.8 months (range, 1 to 144 months). At the final follow-up, VAS and MHHS improved significantly from 6.3 and 53.4 to 3.0 and 88.3, respectively (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in hip flexion, abduction, adduction, external rotation, and internal rotation as minor improvements from 113.1°, 38.5°, 28.5°, 36.5°, and 22.7° to 118.5°, 39.0°, 29.2°, 38.9°, and 26.5° were observed, respectively (p = 0.070, p = 0.414, p = 0.317, p = 0.084, and p = 0.136, respectively). None of the patients exhibited progression of osteoarthritis of the hip at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic treatment after acetabular fracture or hip dislocation is effective and delays the progression of traumatic osteoarthritis.
Adult
;
Arthroscopy/*methods
;
Female
;
Hip/*physiopathology/radiography/*surgery
;
Hip Dislocation/*surgery
;
Hip Fractures/*surgery
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Osteoarthritis
;
Pain/physiopathology/*surgery
;
Pain Measurement
;
Range of Motion, Articular
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Young Adult