OBJECTIVETo evaluate incidence of postoperative delirium after hip surgery in elderly patients by meta-analysis.

METHODSFrom January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2013, clinical literatures about postoperative delirium after hip surgery in elderly patients,were searched from the Pubmed. Literature extract table were formed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stata-12.0 was applied for Meta-analysis. P was used to test heterogeneity of study, random-effect model was performed when I2 > 50%. Subgroup analysis was used according to stage of age, assessment scale of delirium and statistical area of literature. Begg test was used to test publication bias.

RESULTSTwenty-one literatures were included. Incidence of postoperative delirium after hip surgery in elderly patients by weighted and combination was 17% [95% CI (16%, 18%)]. Incidence of postoperative delirium after optional hip surgery was decreased more than emergency operation in included 5 literatures [OR = 0.32, 95% CI (0.22, 0.45)]. Incidence of postoperative delirium in patients less than 80 years old was 21% [95% CI (19%, 23%)], while 21% [95% CI (19%, 24%)] in patients more than 80 years old. Incidence of postoperative delirium in CAM evaluation scale was 23% [95% CI (21%, 26%)], while 19% [95% CI (17%, 21%)] in other evaluation scales. Incidence of postoperative delirium in Asian area was 17% [95% CI (15%, 20%)], while 23% [95% CI (21%, 25%)] in European and American area. There was no publication bias tested by Begg test (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONIncidence of postoperative delirium after hip surgery in elderly patients increases higher, especially in emergency operation. A standardizing research method is benefit for evaluate incidence of postoperative delirium after hip surgery in elderly patients, decreasing heterogeneity and publication bias.

Aged ; Delirium ; epidemiology ; Hip Fractures ; surgery ; Humans ; Incidence ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Publication Bias

OBJECTIVETo assess the curative effect and investigate the indications of total hip arthroplasty for treatment of comminuted intertrochanteric fractures.

METHODSTotal hip arthroplasty was carried out in 9 cases of severe intertrochanteric fracture. The patients included two men and seven women. The average age of the patients was 68 years (48-75 years). The period from fracture to operation was 5 days (2-10 days). The mean follow-up period lasted for 11 months (3 months-2 years). There was one patient with comminuted intertrochanteric fracture accompanied by femoral head necrosis and 2 patients with intertrochanteric fracture and stroke. Other 6 patients had severe osteoporosis. The Harris score before operation was 63 points (45-71 points).

RESULTSAt the last follow-up, the patients gained 86 points (70-100 points) according to the Harris score. The effects of the 8 cases were good. The Harris score of all patients improved after treatment. Only two hemiplegia patients needed sticks to walk. The others could walk without hip pain. No radiographic evidence of acetabular wear and prosthesis dislocation or other major complications happened during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONSProsthetic replacements can well treat unstable intertrochanteric fracture if operative indication is correctly selected. It is suitable for elderly patients and the operation should be performed by experienced surgeons.

Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; methods ; Female ; Femur Head Necrosis ; epidemiology ; Fractures, Comminuted ; surgery ; Hip Fractures ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: Hip fractures among elderly patients are surgical emergencies. During COVID-19 pandemic time, many such patients could not be operated at early time because of the limitation of the medical resources, the risk of infection and redirection of medical attention to a severe infective health problem. METHODS: A search of electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) with the keywords "COVID", "COVID-19″, "SARS-COV-2", "Corona", "pandemic", "hip fracture", "trochanteric fracture" and "neck femur fracture" revealed 64 studies evaluating treatment of hip fracture in elderly patients during COVID-19 pandemic time. The 30-day mortality rate, inpatient mortality rate, critical care/special care need, readmission rate and complications rate in both groups were evaluated. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) V.5.3. RESULTS: After screening, 7 studies were identified that described the mortality and morbidity in hip fractures in both COVID-19 infected (COVID-19 +) and non-infected (COVID-19 -) patients. There were significantly increased risks of 30-day mortality (32.23% COVID-19 + death vs. 8.85% COVID-19 - death) and inpatient mortality (29.33% vs. 2.62%) among COVID-19 + patients with odds ratio (OR) of 4.84 (95% CI: 3.13 - 7.47, p < 0.001) and 15.12 (95% CI: 6.12 - 37.37, p < 0.001), respectively. The COVID-19 + patients needed more critical care admission (OR = 5.08, 95% CI: 1.49 - 17.30, p < 0.009) and they remain admitted for a longer time in hospital (mean difference = 3.6, 95% CI: 1.74 - 5.45, p < 0.001); but there was no difference in readmission rate between these 2 groups. The risks of overall complications (OR = 17.22), development of pneumonia (OR = 22.25), and acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute respiratory failure (OR = 32.96) were significantly high among COVID-19 + patients compared to COVID-19 - patients. CONCLUSIONS There are increased risks of the 30-day mortality, inpatient mortality and critical care admission among hip fracture patients who are COVID-19 +. The chances of developing pneumonia and acute respiratory failure are more in COVID-19 + patients than in COVID-19 ‒ patients.
Humans ; Aged ; COVID-19/epidemiology* ; Pandemics ; Hospital Mortality ; Hip Fractures/surgery* ; Pneumonia ; Morbidity ; Respiratory Insufficiency/complications*

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the incidence of preoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after hip fractures in Korea. METHODS: In this prospective study, we enrolled 152 Korean geriatric patients who had suffered hip fractures due to a simple fall and were hospitalized between January 2013 and December 2013. There were 52 male and 100 female patients, and their mean age was 78.2 years. There were 96 trochanteric fractures and 56 femoral neck fractures. All patients were examined for DVT: 26 by ultrasonography and 126 by computed tomography venography. The patients having DVT underwent inferior vena cava filter insertion before the surgical intervention. RESULTS: Preoperatively, none of the patients had any signs or symptoms of DVT; however, 4 patients were identified as having asymptomatic DVT. The overall incidence of DVT was 2.6% (4/152). The mean time to arrival at emergency room after injury was 32.6 hours. Mean time elapsed to undergo surgery after hospitalization was 24.9 hours. The average time to hospitalization after injury was 237 hours for patients with DVT versus 27.5 hours for patients without DVT. DVT developed within 72 hours in two of the 137 patients (1.4%) and after 72 hours in two of the remaining 15 patients (13.3%) hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: While the preoperative incidence of DVT after hip fractures was relatively low (2.6%) in the Korean geriatric population, we confirmed that getting no treatment within 72 hours after injury increased the incidence of DVT. Thus, we conclude from this study that a workup for DVT should be considered in cases where admission or surgery has been delayed for more than 72 hours after injury.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Hip Fractures/*complications/epidemiology/*surgery ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Time-to-Treatment ; Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis/*epidemiology/*etiology

OBJECTIVETo investigate the therapic choice of intertrochanteric fractures of femur in aged patient.

METHODSFrom June 2006 to June 2010,58 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were treated with surgical methods. There were 25 males and 33 females, aged from 65 to 93 years old (averaged 79 years old). According to the Evans type, type I was in 30 cases, type II was in 28 cases. Of them, 25 patients were treated with hip replacement (group A) and 33 patients were treated with internal fixation (group B). The operative time, blood loss volume, the time of get out of bed, drainage volume, complications and function of joint motion were compared between two groups. According to Harris scoring to evaluate function of joint motion at the 3rd, 6th, 12th months after operation.

RESULTSAll patients were followed up more than 12 months (averaged 16.4 months). One patient in group A died of pneumonia one month later after operation and other patients live safely through peri-operation. The group B was better than that of group A at operative time, blood loss volume, drainage volume. In group A, 1 case died and 1 case got DVT, 2 cases got urinary tract infection and 1 case got pneumonia. While in group B, 1 case got bedsore, 1 case got coxa vara and 2 cases got urinary tract infection. The incidence rate of complication in group B was lower than that of group A (P < 0.05). According to Harris scoring system, at the 3rd, 6th,12th months after operation, Harris scoring in group A was respectively (78.43 +/- 5.32), (81.67 +/- 4.87), (87.66 +/- 4.01) scores and in group B was respectively (75.45 +/- 3.22), (76.33 +/- 4.12), (88.65 +/- 3.77) scores. There was statistical significance in Harris scoring at the 3rd, 6th months after operation between two groups (P < 0.05) and there was no statistical significance at the 12th months after operation (P > 0.05). At three months after operation, in group A,14 cases obtained excellent results, 5 good, 5 fair and 1 poor; and in group B, 8 cases obtained excellent results, 13 good, 9 fair and 3 poor. Six months later, in group A,18 excellent, 5 good, 2 fair and 0 poor, and in group B,10 excellent, 15 good, 6 fair and 2 poor. Twelve months later,in group A,18 excellent, 5 good, 1 fair and 1 poor; and in group B, 21 excellent, 9 good, 3 fair and 0 poor. Three and six months later after operation, the clinical effect in group A was better than that of group B (P < 0.05); but twelve months later, there was no significant differences between two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONThe internal fixation is especially the preferred method for the aged patient with intertrochanteric fractures. Hip replacement refer to pathologicalfracture caused by cancer, unheeded fracture abnormity, osteoprosis too serious to be treated by internal fixation or patients with ipsilateral symptomatic degenerative joint or revisions caused by failed internal fixation and severely intertrochanteric comminuted fractures and merged severely osteoporosis.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Hip Fractures ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; prevention & control

OBJECTIVETo compare the clinical effects of three methods of internal fixations in treating intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.

METHODSFrom 2004 to 2008, the clinical data of 112 patients with intertrochanteric fractures were retrospectively analyzed. There were 63 males and 49 females, aged from 60 to 80 years with an average of 66.2 years. The patients were treated respectively with dynamic hip screws (DHS group, 40 cases), anatomic plate (anatomic plate group, 36 cases) and proximal femoral intramedullary nails (PFN group, 36 cases). The data of each group were collected for statistical analysis on the following aspects: operative time, blood loss volume, clinical healing time of fracture, postoperative complications, and hip functional score of Harris.

RESULTSAll these patients were followed up from 20 to 24 months with an average of 22.6 months. There was no significant difference in operative time, blood loss volume among three groups; there was significant difference in clinical healing time of fracture, Harris score and postoperative complications among three groups (P < 0.05). In the healing time, the PFN group was significantly less than that of other groups (P = 0.001), but there was no differences between DHS group and anatomic plate group. In the Harris score, the PFN group was significantly higher than that of other groups (P = 0.001), but there was no differences between DHS group and anatomic plate group. In the aspect of postoperation complication, there was 2 cases of coxa vara, 1 case of internal fixation loosening and 1 case of deep venous thrombosis in the DHS group; there were 2 cases of deep venous thrombosis in the PFN group; there were 2 cases of coxa vara and 1 case of internal fixation loosening in the anatomic plate group (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONIn the treatment of intertronchanteric fractures, proximal femoral intramedullary nail may be the best choice, which can decrease healing time as well as complications postoperatively.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Femoral Fractures ; surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; adverse effects ; methods ; Fracture Healing ; Hip Fractures ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Osteoporotic fractures are an important comorbidity with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We determined the overall fracture risk as assessed by the World Health Organization (WHO)'s FRAX(R) tool in Korean patients with seropositive RA. Additionally, we compared treatment eligibility according to the criteria of the Korean Health Insurance Review Agency (HIRA), FRAX, and the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF). METHODS: Postmenopausal women and men > or = 50 years of age with seropositive RA were recruited from one rheumatism center in Korea. The FRAX score was estimated using the Japanese model. Patients were classified as eligible for treatment using the HIRA, NOF, and FRAX thresholds for intervention. RESULTS: The study of 234 patients included 40 men (17%). The mean age was 60 +/- 9 years, and 121 (52%) patients had osteoporosis according to the WHO criteria. The overall median 10-year fracture risk was 13% for major osteoporotic fractures and 3.5% for hip fractures. HIRA guidelines identified 130 patients (56%) eligible for treatment, FRAX included 126 patients (54%), and 151 patients (65%) were included according to NOF guidelines. Older patients with a greater number of risk factors were included by FRAX compared to HIRA. The overall concordance between HIRA and FRAX, expressed as the kappa index, was 0.67, but was as low as 0.44 when limited to patients > or = 60 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: One-half of the patients had osteoporosis requiring treatment. RA patients have a high risk of fracture, and the adoption of a risk-scoring system should be considered.
Aged ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid/*complications ; Bone Density ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Hip Fractures/epidemiology ; Humans ; Korea/epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis/epidemiology/*therapy ; Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prevalence

INTRODUCTIONIntertrochanteric (IT) fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the elderly population. We aim to compare the clinical outcome of unstable with stable IT fractures after treatment with dynamic hip screw (DHS).

MATERIALS AND METHODSPatients with IT fractures treated with DHS at National University Hospital between 2003 and 2005 were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: stable and unstable IT fractures. Clinical outcome parameters include perioperative complications, functional outcomes, and incidence of morbidity and mortality.

RESULTSOne hundred and thirty-six patients were analysed. Mean age was 77 years. There were 61 stable and 78 unstable fractures. Average length of follow-up was 30 months. The rates of local complications were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The incidence of malunion and excessive impaction were significantly higher in the unstable group. The ambulatory status at one year post-surgery was not significantly different between the 2 groups. In terms of general postoperative complications and one year mortality rate, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. The need for blood transfusion was significantly higher in the unstable group.

CONCLUSIONIn summary, DHS fixation provides comparable postoperative outcomes in unstable IT fractures with relatively low rates of complications. Although it was associated with a higher incidence of malunion and excessive impaction in the unstable fracture group, there was no difference in functional status at one-year compared to the stable group.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Screws ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Hip Fractures ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; epidemiology ; Treatment Outcome

We investigated which of the three FRAX fracture risk assessment tool models is most applicable to Korean women. For 306 postmenopausal women (mean age, 77 yr) with a hip fracture, fracture probabilities were calculated using FRAX models from Japan, Turkey and China. Data on bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck were available for 103 patients. Significant differences existed among the models, independent of the inclusion of BMD in the calculation of fracture probabilities. The probabilities of both major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures were significantly higher in the Japanese model than in the Turkish or Chinese models. In all of the models, the probabilities of a major osteoporotic fracture, but not of a hip fracture, decreased significantly if calculated without BMD values. By applying the Japanese model, the ten-year probabilities for major osteoporotic and hip fractures increased significantly with age. Our results suggest that the Japanese FRAX model might be the most appropriate for Korean women.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Density/physiology ; Female ; Fractures, Bone/*epidemiology/ethnology/prevention & control ; Hip Fractures/epidemiology/ethnology/prevention & control ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; *Models, Statistical ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Risk Assessment

BACKGROUND: Recently, various femoral head fixation devices (HFDs) for trochanteric fractures have become available. However, there are some cases in which femoral head rotation with excessive sliding of the HFD is observed and it is often followed by cutout. The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of the three types of HFDs to prevent femoral head rotation. METHODS: Between July 2005 and December 2009, 206 patients aged over 60 years with trochanteric fractures who had undergone surgical treatment using a short femoral nail in our institution were enrolled into the study. We used the gamma 3 nail (GMN) as the screw-type HFD in 66 cases, the gliding nail (GLN) as a non-cylindrical blade in 76 cases, and the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) as a cylindrical blade in 64 cases. The sliding length of HFDs and the occurrence of femoral head rotation were evaluated by assessing radiographs as the main outcome, and the results were compared among these devices. RESULTS: A comparison of the degree of sliding in the GMN group showed that femoral head rotation was observed significantly more frequently in cases with rotation. Further, it appeared that femoral head rotation occurred more frequently in comminuted fractures. However, no significant differences between the sliding lengths of the different HFDs were observed among three groups. Femoral head rotation was observed in 15 cases of GMN (22.7%), 0 case of GLN, and 5 case of PFNA (7.8%). Significant differences with regard to the occurrence of femoral head rotation were observed among the three groups. Furthermore, significant differences were also observed between GLN and PFNA with respect to the occurrence of femoral head rotation. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to stabilize femoral head appears to be greater with blade-type materials than with screw-type materials. Furthermore, we believe that a non-cylindrical blade is preferable to a cylindrical blade for the surgical treatment of comminuted, unstable trochanteric fractures in order to prevent femoral head rotation and cut-out.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Femur Head/*surgery ; Hip Fractures/*surgery ; Humans ; Internal Fixators/*statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Range of Motion, Articular/physiology ; Retrospective Studies