At Kuki Suzunoki Hospital, an incentive system was implemented to help maintain a good therapeutic environment and to improve morale among hospital staff and increase self-awareness of their role. This article describes the implementation and evaluation of this employee targeted reward system. A committee system was adopted to achieve system operation. Members of the promotion committee comprised personnel from many different fields of work who formulated and operated the system. Members of the handbook committee consisted of supervisors or staff from each department who liaised and coordinated with staff in their own departments. Each staff member was responsible for contributing topics for a progress report leading to therapeutic initiatives for patients and their families and also to raising questions relating to medical treatments and answering these questions, which were contributed via the hospital’s intranet. Some of the best contributions were acknowledged every month, and further selections throughout the year were made and awarded. Every submission and commendation earned points in accordance with set guidelines, and staff could exchange their accumulated points with a reward of their choice. This system enhanced the employees’ morale, and because cases of successful treatment and valuable ideas were collected, the booklet that was created to summarize this system was used to further educate the staff and also to campaign outside the hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To test the effects of heart rate, body mass index (BMI) and noise level on interscan and interobserver variability of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring on a prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered 64-slice CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS:One hundred and ten patients (76 patients with CAC) were scanned twice on prospective ECG-triggered scans. The scan parameters included 120 kV, 82 mAs, a 2.5 mm thickness, and an acquisition center at 45% of the RR interval. The interscan and interobserver variability on the CAC scores (Agatston, volume, and mass) was calculated. The factors affecting the variability were determined by plotting it against heart rate, BMI, and noise level (defined as the standard deviation: SD). RESULTS: The estimated effective dose was 1.5 +/- 0.2 mSv. The mean heart rate was 63 +/- 12 bpm (range, 44-101 bpm). The patient BMIs were 24.5 +/- 4.5 kg/m2 (range, 15.5-42.3 kg/m2). The mean and median interscan variabilities were 11% and 6%, respectively by volume, and 11% and 6%, respectively, by mass. Moreover, the mean and median of the algorithms were lower than the Agatston algorithm (16% and 9%, respectively). The mean and median interobserver variability was 10% and 4%, respectively (average of algorithms). The mean noise levels were 15 +/- 4 Hounsfield unit (HU) (range, 8-25 HU). The interscan and interobserver variability was not correlated with heart rate, BMI, or noise level. CONCLUSION: The interscan and interobserver variability of CAC on a prospective ECG-triggered 64-slice CT with high image quality and 45% of RR acquisition is not significantly affected by heart rate, BMI, or noise level. The volume or mass algorithms show reduced interscan variability compared to the Agatston scoring (p < 0.05).
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; *Body Mass Index ; Calcium/*analysis ; Coronary Angiography/*methods ; Coronary Vessels/*chemistry ; *Electrocardiography ; Female ; *Heart Rate ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Prospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods

Azoospermia/therapy* ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Microdissection ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Retrospective Studies ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic ; Sperm Motility ; Sperm Retrieval ; Spermatozoa ; Testis