Objective : To evaluate the effect of beraprost sodium (beraprost) on the vascular events occurring in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled, randomized trials.
Design : Meta-analysis
Methods : Among the clinical trials of beraprost in patients with intermittent claudication associated with PAD, placebo-controlled, randomized trials with vascular events as outcome measures were selected. Two trials met the criteria, each of which was a comparative trial of beraprost (40 μg t.i.d.) and placebo (t.i.d.), with a six-month follow-up period.
Results : With both trials combined, the analysis included 594 patients in the beraprost group and 590 in the placebo group. The risk ratio was 0.608 (95%CI : 0.41 to 0.90, p =0.012), demonstrating the efficacy of beraprost on all vascular events. The risk ratio for lower limb deterioration was 0.598 (95% CI : 0.34 to 1.06, p =0.079), which was similar to that for all vascular events. A statistically insignificant but similar result was also obtained for cardio/cerebrovascular events with a risk ratio of 0.619 (95%CI : 0.36 to 1.07, p = 0.085). Heterogeneity between the two studies was not found for any of the events.
Conclusion : The results demonstrated the efficacy of beraprost on the vascular events in patients with PAD. The potential benefit of beraprost on vascular events will require evaluation in a larger prospective investigation.

We report a very rare case of negative pressure pulmonary edema (NPPE) that occurred immediately after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The patient was a 25-year-old man who sustained a facet fracture-dislocation of C5 during a traffic accident. After ACDF, he developed NPPE and needed mechanical ventilation. Fortunately, he recovered fully within 24 hours. NPPE is a rare postoperative complication that may occur after cervical spine surgery. The aims of this report are to present information regarding the diagnosis and emergent treatment of NPPE, and to review the previous literature regarding this serious complication.
Accidents, Traffic ; Adult ; Diagnosis ; Diskectomy ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Pulmonary Edema* ; Respiration, Artificial ; Spine*

Prospective clinical study.

Prospective clinical study.

Methods: The study included patients aged ≥65 years who underwent spinal surgeries. The patients aged ≥85, 75–84, and 65–74 years were categorized into the super-old, old, and pre-old groups, respectively. The differences in perioperative age-related complications were compared among the three groups while matching for surgical procedures and general conditions (study 1). Furthermore, preoperative and intraoperative factors were examined for perioperative complications in the super-old group (study 2). Complications were categorized into surgical site and systemic complications. Results: The analysis included 44 patients from each group. In study 1, the total complication rates were 40.9%, 25%, and 18.2% of the super-old, old, and pre-old groups, respectively. Differences in complication rates were observed between the super-old and pre-old groups (p=0.011). In study 2, 58 patients from the super-old group were analyzed. Surgical site complications were significantly associated with longer surgical duration (p=0.02) and more estimated blood loss (p=0.003). Systemic complications were significantly associated with previous cerebrovascular disease (p=0.014), preoperative motor deficit (p=0.023), and emergency case (p=0.006) and negatively associated with diabetes mellitus (p=0.048). Conclusions Perioperative complications increased with advancing age in the super-old, old, and pre-old groups. The complication type is associated with specific background factors; therefore, determining them may help prevent perioperative complications.

Methods: The study included patients aged ≥65 years who underwent spinal surgeries. The patients aged ≥85, 75–84, and 65–74 years were categorized into the super-old, old, and pre-old groups, respectively. The differences in perioperative age-related complications were compared among the three groups while matching for surgical procedures and general conditions (study 1). Furthermore, preoperative and intraoperative factors were examined for perioperative complications in the super-old group (study 2). Complications were categorized into surgical site and systemic complications. Results: The analysis included 44 patients from each group. In study 1, the total complication rates were 40.9%, 25%, and 18.2% of the super-old, old, and pre-old groups, respectively. Differences in complication rates were observed between the super-old and pre-old groups (p=0.011). In study 2, 58 patients from the super-old group were analyzed. Surgical site complications were significantly associated with longer surgical duration (p=0.02) and more estimated blood loss (p=0.003). Systemic complications were significantly associated with previous cerebrovascular disease (p=0.014), preoperative motor deficit (p=0.023), and emergency case (p=0.006) and negatively associated with diabetes mellitus (p=0.048). Conclusions Perioperative complications increased with advancing age in the super-old, old, and pre-old groups. The complication type is associated with specific background factors; therefore, determining them may help prevent perioperative complications.

Methods: The study included patients aged ≥65 years who underwent spinal surgeries. The patients aged ≥85, 75–84, and 65–74 years were categorized into the super-old, old, and pre-old groups, respectively. The differences in perioperative age-related complications were compared among the three groups while matching for surgical procedures and general conditions (study 1). Furthermore, preoperative and intraoperative factors were examined for perioperative complications in the super-old group (study 2). Complications were categorized into surgical site and systemic complications. Results: The analysis included 44 patients from each group. In study 1, the total complication rates were 40.9%, 25%, and 18.2% of the super-old, old, and pre-old groups, respectively. Differences in complication rates were observed between the super-old and pre-old groups (p=0.011). In study 2, 58 patients from the super-old group were analyzed. Surgical site complications were significantly associated with longer surgical duration (p=0.02) and more estimated blood loss (p=0.003). Systemic complications were significantly associated with previous cerebrovascular disease (p=0.014), preoperative motor deficit (p=0.023), and emergency case (p=0.006) and negatively associated with diabetes mellitus (p=0.048). Conclusions Perioperative complications increased with advancing age in the super-old, old, and pre-old groups. The complication type is associated with specific background factors; therefore, determining them may help prevent perioperative complications.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. PURPOSE: The main purpose of this study was to clarify the range of magnification errors on digital plain radiographs and to determine if there is a correlation between the body mass index (BMI) of a patient and the magnification error. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Most clinicians currently use digital plain radiography. This new method allows one to access images and measure lengths and angles more easily than with the past technologies. In addition, conventional plain radiography has magnification errors. Although few articles mention magnification errors in regards to digital radiographs, they are known to have the same errors. METHODS: We used plain digital radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to acquire images of the cervical spine with the goal of evaluating magnification errors by measuring the anteroposterior vertebral body lengths of C2 and C5. The magnification error (ME) was then calculated: ME=(length on radiograph-length on MRI)/length on MRI x100 (%). The correlation coefficient between the magnification error and BMI was obtained using Pearson's correlation analysis. RESULTS: Average magnification errors in C2 and C5 were approximately 18.5%+/-5.4% (range, 0%-30%) and 20.7%+/-6.3% (range, 1%-32%). There was no positive correlation between BMI and the magnification error. CONCLUSIONS: There were magnification errors on the digital plain radiographs, and they were different in each case. Maximum magnification error differences were 30% (C2) and 31% (C5). Based on these finding, clinicians must pay attention to magnification errors when measuring lengths using digital plain radiography.
Body Mass Index ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging* ; Prospective Studies ; Radiographic Image Enhancement ; Radiography ; Spine*