1.Analysis of clinical characteristics of 30 cases with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma
Lieyang WANG ; Zhiqiang ZHAO ; Yanhong LUO ; Liping SU ; Yuping ZHENG ; Hexin LI
Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma 2011;20(8):471-474
Objective To study clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (S-ALCL). Methods Clinical date of 30 systemic ALCL patients from Department Hemotology of Shanxi Cancer Hospital from December 1998 to September 2009 were reviewed. Results The median age of the 30 patients was 36 years old. The male/female ratio was 1.5:1.18 (60.0 %) 18/30 of the patients had B symptoms, 22 (73.3 %) had Ann Arbor stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ, and 18 (60.0 %) had extranodal disease at diagnosis. 14 (46.7 %) had elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. The positive rate of ALK was 18 (60.0 %). Compared with ALK negative patients, ALK-positive patients were younger (u = 3.92, P=0.001).ALK expression and LDH level were important prognostic factors by Long-rank test. Conclusion S-ALCL usually occur in younger patients, with good response to chemotherapy and good prognosis. ALK negative and elevated LDH level are correlated to unfavorable prognosis. Combination chemotherapy is the major choice to these patients. High-dose chemotherapy maybe benefit to the patients who have adverse prognostic factors.
2.Effect of food improvement on the retention time of nasogastric tube in stroke patients with dysphagia
Qian SUN ; Yin SU ; Yaxuan XIANG ; Xiaoli JIA ; Jie LIU ; Xuelian HE ; Hexin ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing 2018;34(10):742-745
Objective To explore the effect of food improvement on the retention time of nasogastric tube in stroke patients with dysphagia. Methods Sixty cases were assigned to the control group(30 cases) and the experimental group(30 cases) by random digits table method, the control group received routine nasogastric feeding, and the experimental group were given texture modified foods and thickened liquid to try to help them eating through the mouth. The feeding tube was pull out when the person in experimental group was capable of taking texture modified foods and thickened liquid without difficulty,while the tube was pull out when the person in control group was able to eat regular food and drink regular fluids. The retention time of nasogastric tube of two groups was compared. Results The retention time of nasogastric tube was(6.13±2.96)d in the experimental group and(18.93±7.58)d in the control group, there was significant difference (t =-8.162, P<0.01). Conclusions Food improvement can effectively shortenthe retention time of nasogastric tube in stroke patients with dysphagia.
3.Effect of preoperative immune checkpoint inhibitors on reducing residual lymph node metastases in patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective study
Xinhua CHEN ; Hexin LIN ; Yuehong CHEN ; Xiaodong WANG ; Chaoqun LIU ; Huilin HUANG ; Huayuan LIANG ; Huimin ZHANG ; Fengping LI ; Hao LIU ; Yanfeng HU ; Guoxin LI ; Jun YOU ; Liying ZHAO ; Jiang YU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2024;27(7):694-701
Objective:To investigate the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors on reducing residual lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.Methods:The cohort of this retrospective study comprised patients from Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University who had undergone systemic treatment prior to gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and had achieved Grade 1 primary tumor regression (TRG1) from January 2014 to December 2023. After exclusion of patients who had undergone preoperative radiotherapy, data of 58 patients (Nanfang Hospital: 46; First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University: 12) were analyzed. These patients were allocated to preoperative chemotherapy (Chemotherapy group, N=36 cases) and preoperative immunotherapy plus chemotherapy groups (Immunotherapy group, N=22 cases). There were no significant differences between these groups in sex, age, body mass index, diabetes, tumor location, pathological type, Lauren classification, tumor differentiation, pretreatment depth of invasion by primary tumor, pretreatment lymph node stage, pretreatment clinical stage, mismatch repair protein status, number of preoperative treatment cycles, or duration of preoperative treatment (all P>0.05). The primary outcome measure was postoperative lymph node downstaging. Secondary outcomes included postoperative depth of invasion by tumor, number of lymph nodes examined, and factors affecting residual lymph node metastasis status. Results:Lymph node downstaging was achieved significantly more often in the Immunotherapy group than the Chemotherapy group (pN0: 90.9% [20/22] vs. 61.1% [22/36]; pN1: 4.5% [1/22] vs. 36.1% [13/36]; pN2: 4.5% [1/22) vs. 0; pN3: 0 vs. 2.8% [1/36], Z=-2.315, P=0.021). There were no significant difference between the two groups in number of lymph nodes examined (40.5±16.3 vs. 40.8±17.5, t=0.076, P=0.940) or postoperative depth of invasion by primary tumor (pT1a: 50.0% [11/22] vs. 30.6% [11/36]; pT1b: 13.6% [3/22] vs. 19.4% [7/36]; pT2: 13.6% [3/22] vs. 13.9% [5/36]; pT3: 13.6% [3/22] vs. 25.0% [9/36]; pT4a: 9.1% [2/22] vs. 11.1% [4/36], Z=-1.331, P=0.183). Univariate analysis revealed that both preoperative treatment regimens were associated with residual lymph node metastasis status in patients whose primary tumor regression was TRG1 (χ 2=6.070, P=0.014). Multivariate analysis incorporated the following factors: pretreatment depth of invasion by primary tumor, pretreatment lymph node stage, pretreatment clinical stage, number of preoperative treatment cycles, and preoperative treatment duration. We found that a combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy administered preoperatively was an independent protective factor for reducing residual lymph node metastases in study patients whose primary tumor regression was TRG1 (OR=0.147, 95%CI: 0.026–0.828, P=0.030). Conclusion:Compared with preoperative chemotherapy alone, a combination of preoperative immunotherapy and chemotherapy achieved greater reduction of residual lymph node metastases in the study patients who achieved TRG1 tumor regression in their primary lesions.
4.Effect of preoperative immune checkpoint inhibitors on reducing residual lymph node metastases in patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective study
Xinhua CHEN ; Hexin LIN ; Yuehong CHEN ; Xiaodong WANG ; Chaoqun LIU ; Huilin HUANG ; Huayuan LIANG ; Huimin ZHANG ; Fengping LI ; Hao LIU ; Yanfeng HU ; Guoxin LI ; Jun YOU ; Liying ZHAO ; Jiang YU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2024;27(7):694-701
Objective:To investigate the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors on reducing residual lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.Methods:The cohort of this retrospective study comprised patients from Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University who had undergone systemic treatment prior to gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and had achieved Grade 1 primary tumor regression (TRG1) from January 2014 to December 2023. After exclusion of patients who had undergone preoperative radiotherapy, data of 58 patients (Nanfang Hospital: 46; First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University: 12) were analyzed. These patients were allocated to preoperative chemotherapy (Chemotherapy group, N=36 cases) and preoperative immunotherapy plus chemotherapy groups (Immunotherapy group, N=22 cases). There were no significant differences between these groups in sex, age, body mass index, diabetes, tumor location, pathological type, Lauren classification, tumor differentiation, pretreatment depth of invasion by primary tumor, pretreatment lymph node stage, pretreatment clinical stage, mismatch repair protein status, number of preoperative treatment cycles, or duration of preoperative treatment (all P>0.05). The primary outcome measure was postoperative lymph node downstaging. Secondary outcomes included postoperative depth of invasion by tumor, number of lymph nodes examined, and factors affecting residual lymph node metastasis status. Results:Lymph node downstaging was achieved significantly more often in the Immunotherapy group than the Chemotherapy group (pN0: 90.9% [20/22] vs. 61.1% [22/36]; pN1: 4.5% [1/22] vs. 36.1% [13/36]; pN2: 4.5% [1/22) vs. 0; pN3: 0 vs. 2.8% [1/36], Z=-2.315, P=0.021). There were no significant difference between the two groups in number of lymph nodes examined (40.5±16.3 vs. 40.8±17.5, t=0.076, P=0.940) or postoperative depth of invasion by primary tumor (pT1a: 50.0% [11/22] vs. 30.6% [11/36]; pT1b: 13.6% [3/22] vs. 19.4% [7/36]; pT2: 13.6% [3/22] vs. 13.9% [5/36]; pT3: 13.6% [3/22] vs. 25.0% [9/36]; pT4a: 9.1% [2/22] vs. 11.1% [4/36], Z=-1.331, P=0.183). Univariate analysis revealed that both preoperative treatment regimens were associated with residual lymph node metastasis status in patients whose primary tumor regression was TRG1 (χ 2=6.070, P=0.014). Multivariate analysis incorporated the following factors: pretreatment depth of invasion by primary tumor, pretreatment lymph node stage, pretreatment clinical stage, number of preoperative treatment cycles, and preoperative treatment duration. We found that a combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy administered preoperatively was an independent protective factor for reducing residual lymph node metastases in study patients whose primary tumor regression was TRG1 (OR=0.147, 95%CI: 0.026–0.828, P=0.030). Conclusion:Compared with preoperative chemotherapy alone, a combination of preoperative immunotherapy and chemotherapy achieved greater reduction of residual lymph node metastases in the study patients who achieved TRG1 tumor regression in their primary lesions.