Paraesophageal hernia comprises only 2 approximately 5% of all hiata hernias but is prone to incarceration and strangulation. For this reason they must be recognized and repaired as expeditiously as possible. The laparoscopic approach has already been successfully applied to the repair of the more common sliding hiatal hernia and it seems reasonable to propose that the paraesophageal hernia, provided it is not complicated, might also be repaired by the laparoscopic technique. We present here a case of paraesophageal hernia which has been successfully repaired by the laparoscopic approach. A 73-year-old female suffering from postprandial fullness in the retrosternal area was diagnosed preoperatively with paraesophageal hiatal hernia with gastroesophageal acid reflux and was submitted for laparoscopic repair. The procedure entailed reduction of the hernia, mobilization of the esophagogastric junction with crural repair and partial fundoplication. At the 9th-month follow-up, the patient had remained asymptomatic and follow-up studies revealed no evidence of hernia or acid reflux. As a result of this favorable experience with minimal morbidity, early hospital discharge, and effective control of symptoms without adverse sequalae, laparoscopic repair can be considered as the curative and minimal invasive method in the management of paraesophageal hernia.
Aged ; Case Report ; Female ; Hernia, Hiatal/complications/*surgery ; Human ; Laparoscopy

OBJECTIVETo investigate the long-term outcomes of various antireflux procedures for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODSBetween November 1988 and January 2004, 129 patients with GERD underwent antireflux procedures. Six kinds of antireflux procedures were performed including Nissen fundoplication, cardiac oblique invagination (COI) procedure, Belsey Mark IV, Toupet, Thal and Dor procedures. One hundred and sixteen patients were followed up. Esophageal manometry study was carried out in 95 patients preoperatively and 51 postoperatively. 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring were carried out in 56 patients preoperatively and 35 postoperatively. Esophagoscopy were performed in all patients before operation and 48 cases after operation.

RESULTSClinical symptom scores reduced significantly from 4.1 +/- 0.4 before surgery to 1.1 +/- 1.0 after surgery (t = 27.21, P < 0.01). The outcome of surgery showed excellent in 42 cases (36.2%), good in 60 (51.7%), fair in 7 (6.0%), poor in 7 (6.0%). The long-term follow-up showed excellent or good results in 87.9% of patients. There was no significant difference in Nissen fundoplication, COI procedure and Belsey Mark IV.

CONCLUSIONSThere are significant differences in symptom score, esophageal manometry, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and esophagoscopy pre- and post-operatively. There is no significant difference in Nissen fundoplication, COI procedure and Belsey Mark IV.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fundoplication ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; etiology ; surgery ; Hernia, Hiatal ; complications ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo study the effect and method of surgical treatment in patients with sliding esophageal hiatal hernia.

METHODSTo divide into two groups: fifty-two patients with sliding esophageal hiatal hernia diagnosed with gastroscopy and X-ray barium meal examination accepted operation. Forty-seven cases were treated by Nissen's operation. Three cases were treated by Hill's operation. One case was treated by Boerema's operation. One case was treated by Rampal's operation. 24-hour esophageal pH and esophageal motility were also monitored before and after operation. Thirty healthy volunteer were performed control group and were monitored by 24-hour esophageal pH and esophageal motility.

RESULTSThe patients in operation group had lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and acid reflux before operation. They became significantly ameliorative after operation. Forty-seven cases (90%) had the satisfactory effect. Two cases (4%) recrudesced.

CONCLUSIONComprehensive examination and perfect surgical choice may play an important role in the treatment of sliding esophageal hiatal hernia; The better method for sliding esophageal hiatal hernia is Nissen's operation.

Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fundoplication ; methods ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; etiology ; Hernia, Hiatal ; complications ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVEThrough reviewing the surgical experience in the treatment of sliding hiatus hernia, the effectiveness of Nissen fundoplication using intraoperative oesophageal manometry has been evaluated.

METHODSThere were 84 undergoing the transabdominal surgery who have been divided into three groups: 27 patients were in the Nissen group, 39 in the floppy Nissen group, 18 in the intraoperative-oesophageal-manometry group.

RESULTSThere is no postoperative death. Complications occurred in 5 patients within one month after operation: in the Nissen group, 2 patients suffered from severe dysphagia and 1 from regurgitation; In the floppy Nissen group, 2 patients had regurgitation; In the intraoperative-oesophageal-manometry group, there were no one suffering severe dysphagia or regurgitation. During the long-term follow-up, excellent functional results were also observed in the intraoperative-oesophageal-manometry group, whereas 2 patients suffered from severe dysphagia and 1 from nausea in the Nissen group and 1 patient recurred in the floppy Nissen group.

CONCLUSIONSThe Nissen fundoplication (NF) should be suitable to be done in patients with sliding hiatus hernia. But if there are possibilities to perform intraoperative oesophageal manometry during the operation of anti-reflux, side effects can be decreased to the least. Intraoperative manometry is useful in standardizing the tightness of the wrap in NF. And it will contribute to reducing or avoiding the happening of complications.

Adult ; Aged ; Esophagus ; pathology ; physiopathology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fundoplication ; Hernia, Hiatal ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Manometry ; methods ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Intraoperative ; Postoperative Complications ; prevention & control ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy and safety among laparoscopic Nissen, Toupet and Dor fundoplication in the treatment of hiatal hernia complicated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODSClinical data of 276 patients of hiatal hernia complicated with GERD undergoing operation in our hospital from December 2012 to January 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, including 149 patients of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (Nissen group), 41 of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (Toupet group), and 86 patients of laparoscopic Dor fundoplication (Dor group). Esophageal reflux status, esophageal manometry, GERD Q rating scale, and postoperative recovery were compare among the three groups.

RESULTSReflux status was improved significantly in the three groups after operation(all P<0.05),except that the efficacy in reducing reflux episodes and reflux longest time was not obvious in Toupet group(P>0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative reflux time, acid reflux time ratio, reflux longest time ratio, DeMeester score among the three groups (all P>0.05). Pairwise comparison showed that Dor group was significantly better than Toupet group in reducing the number of reflux episode(14.36±10.58 vs. 29.83±19.71) and long-reflux (0.64±0.21 vs. 6.20±3.48)(both P<0.05), but Nissen group was better than these two groups in reducing the number of long-reflux (0.38±0.16, P<0.05). As compared to pre-operation, the postoperative esophageal sphincter pressure and residual pressure increased significantly, and the relaxation rate reduced significantly (all P<0.05), while the episode of ineffective swallowing increased significantly in Toupet group (11.25±2.04 vs. 6.36±3.26, P<0.05). The contrast in esophageal manometry between Toupet and Dor group showed that Dor group was better than Toupet group in the recovery of lower esophageal sphincter pressure (mean resting breathing) [(20.69±13.95) mmHg vs.(12.91±6.89) mmHg] and the decrease of ineffective swallowing [9.15±6.44 vs. 11.25±2.04](both P<0.05), while such results of Dor group were similar to Nissen group[(19.87±10.40) mmHg, 6.15±2.95, all P>0.05]. The GERD Q scores were significantly decreased after operation in 3 groups(Nissen group:10.94±2.20 vs.7.41±1.43, t=11.667, P=0.001; Toupet group: 10.91±2.02 vs.7.18±1.33, t=5.109, P=0.005; Dor group: 10.69±1.69 vs. 7.10±1.30, t=7.610, P=0.002). There was no significant difference in GERD Q scores among three groups (F=1.465, P=0.207). The operative time, blood loss, hospital stay and complications were not significantly different among 3 groups (all P>0.05). Follow-up period was 12-51 months (median 19 months), and no significant difference in recurrence was found [Nissen group: 2 cases (1.3%), Toupet group: 1 case (2.4%), Dor group: 1 case (1.2%), χ=0.363, P=0.834].

CONCLUSIONSIt is safe and feasible for these three laparoscopic fundoplications to the treatment of hiatal hernia complicated with GERD. But laparoscopic Nissen and Dor fundoplication are better than Toupet fundoplication in reducing the number of reflux episodes, suppressing long reflux, increasing lower esophageal sphincter pressure (mean resting respiration) and decreasing the incidence of postoperative dysphagia.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; methods ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; physiology ; surgery ; Fundoplication ; methods ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; complications ; surgery ; Hernia, Hiatal ; complications ; surgery ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Manometry ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Giant hiatal hernia (GHH) comprises 5% of hiatal hernia and is associated with significant complications. The traditional operative procedure, no matter transthoracic or transabdomen repair of giant hiatal hernia, is characteristic of more invasion and more complications. Although laparoscopic repair as a minimally invasive surgery is accepted, a part of patients can not tolerate pneumoperitoneum because of combination with cardiopulmonary diseases or severe posterior mediastinal and neck emphesema during operation. The aim of this article was to analyze our experience in gasless laparoscopic repair with abdominal wall lifting to treat the giant hiatal hernia. We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing gasless laparoscopic repair of GHH with abdominal wall lifting from 2012 to 2015 at our institution. The GHH was defined as greater than one-third of the stomach in the chest. Gasless laparoscopic repair of GHH with abdominal wall lifting was attempted in 27 patients. Mean age was 67 years. The results showed that there were no conversions to open surgery and no intraoperative deaths. The mean duration of operation was 100 min (range: 90-130 min). One-side pleura was injured in 4 cases (14.8%). The mean postoperative length of stay was 4 days (range: 3-7 days). Median follow- up was 26 months (range: 6-38 months). Transient dysphagia for solid food occurred in three patients (11.1%), and this symptom disappeared within three months. There was one patient with recurrent hiatal hernia who was reoperated on. Two patients still complained of heartburn three months after surgery. Neither reoperation nor endoscopic treatment due to signs of postoperative esophageal stenosis was required in any patient. Totally, satisfactory outcome was reported in 88.9% patients. It was concluded that the gasless laparoscopic approach with abdominal wall lifting to the repair of GHH is feasible, safe, and effective for the patients who cannot tolerate the pneumoperitoneum.
Abdominal Wall ; surgery ; Aged ; Esophageal Stenosis ; etiology ; Female ; Fundoplication ; adverse effects ; methods ; Heartburn ; etiology ; Hernia, Hiatal ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial ; adverse effects ; Postoperative Complications