1.Study of three-dimensional reconstruction of digitized virtual hepatic images.
Chi-hua FANG ; Shi-zhen ZHONG ; Lin YUAN ; Lei TANG ; Bo-liang WANG ; Xing-hai WANG ; Kun-cheng WU ; Wen-hua HUANG ; Gang-qing ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2004;42(2):94-96
OBJECTIVETo study the methods of three-dimensional reconstruction of digitized virtual hepatic.
METHODSImages of DSCF 2511-2520 were taken from the database of digitized Virtual Chinese Human female No. 1 (VCH-F1). Method of insertion value algorithm of three-dimensional reconstruction was used to make three-dimensional block diagram. In ordering to auto-judge the position of hepatic solid and hepatic ducts, these images were shown with different colors according to the character of color and location of every spot.
RESULTSStereo image of hepatic solid could be shown satisfactorily. Every shape of stereo image and the structure of hepatic duct could be shown by revolving the three-dimensional image with different direction.
CONCLUSIONSThe image of hepatic database of digitized Virtual Chinese female No. 1 was exact. The three-dimensional image of the liver and hepatic duct made by insertion value algorithm of three-dimensional reconstruction were distinct, and it was a ideal method of three-dimensional reconstruction.
Adult ; Female ; Hepatic Duct, Common ; anatomy & histology ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Liver ; anatomy & histology
2.Gadobenate Dimeglumine as an Intrabiliary Contrast Agent: Comparison with Mangafodipir Trisodium with Respect to Non-dilated Biliary Tree Depiction.
Joon Seok LIM ; Myeong Jin KIM ; Yong Yun JUNG ; Ki Whang KIM
Korean Journal of Radiology 2005;6(4):229-234
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of Mangafodipir trisodium (Mn-DPDP) -enhanced MR cholangiogrphy (MRC) and Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) -enhanced MRC in visualizing a non-dilated biliary system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight healthy liver donor candidates underwent contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRC. Mn-DPDP and Gd-BOPTA was used in 36 and 52 patients, respectively. Two radiologists reviewed the MR images and rated the visualization of the common duct, the right and left hepatic ducts, and the second-order branches using a 4-point scale. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the common duct to the liver in the two groups was also compared. RESULTS: Mn-DPDP MRC and Gd-BOPTA MRC both showed similar visualization grades in the common duct (p = .380, Mann-Whitney U test). In the case of the proximal bile ducts, the median visualization grade was significantly higher with Gd-BOPTA MRC than with Mn-DPDP MRC (right hepatic duct: p = 0.016, left hepatic duct: p = 0.014, right secondary order branches: p = 0.006, left secondary order branches, p = 0.003). The common duct-to-liver CNR of the Gd-BOPTA MRC group was significantly higher (38.90+/-24.50) than that of the Mn-DPDP MRC group (24.14+/-17.98) (p = .003, Student's t test). CONCLUSION: Gd-BOPTA, as a biliary contrast agent, is a potential substitute for Mn-DPDP.
Pyridoxal Phosphate/*analogs & derivatives/diagnostic use
;
Organometallic Compounds/*diagnostic use
;
Middle Aged
;
Meglumine/*analogs & derivatives/diagnostic use
;
Male
;
*Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Humans
;
Hepatic Duct, Common/anatomy & histology
;
Female
;
Feasibility Studies
;
Edetic Acid/*analogs & derivatives/diagnostic use
;
*Contrast Media
;
Common Bile Duct/anatomy & histology
;
Bile Ducts/*anatomy & histology
;
Aged
;
Adult
3.The Variation of Hepatic Duct Confluence and Asymptomatic Common Bile Duct Stone with Routine Intraoperative Cholangiogram during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Se Young KIM ; Ki Ho KIM ; Il Dong KIM ; Byung Sun SUH ; Dong Woo SHIN ; Sang Wook KIM ; Jin Soo PARK ; Hye In LIM
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2011;58(6):338-345
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been used to evaluate bile duct stone. But, the routine use of IOC remains controversial. With routine IOC during LC, we reviewed the variation of hepatic duct confluence and try to suggest the diagnostic criteria of asymptomatic common bile duct (CBD) stone. METHODS: We reviewed the medical record of 970 consecutive patients who underwent LC with IOC from January 1999 to December 2009, retrospectively. RESULTS: Nine hundered seventy patients were enrolled. IOC were successful in 957 (98.7%) and unsuccessful in 13 (1.3%). Eighty two of 957 patients (8.2%) were excluded because of no or poor radiologic image. According to Couinaud's classification, 492 patients (56.2%) had type A hepatic duct confluence, 227 patients (26.1%) type B, 15 patients (17%) type C1, 43 patients (4.9%) type C2, 72 patients (8.2%) type D1, 21 patients (2.4%) type D2, 1 patient (0.1%) type E1, 1 patient (0.1%) type E2, 2 patients (0.2%) type F, and 1 patient (0.1%) no classified type. The CBD stone was found in 116 of 970 (12.2%) patients. In 281 patients, preoperative serologic and radiologic tests did not show abnormality. When preoperative findings were not remarkable, there was no difference of clinical features between patients with or without CBD stones. CONCLUSIONS: Although IOC during LC has some demerits, it is a safe and accurate method for the detection of CBD stone and the anatomic variation of intrahepatic duct.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Body Mass Index
;
Cholangiography
;
*Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
;
Female
;
Gallstones/*diagnosis/pathology
;
Hepatic Duct, Common/anatomy & histology/*radiography
;
Humans
;
Intraoperative Period
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies