The aim of this study was to identify the risk factor related to the need for operative treatment and avoid unnecessary non-operative management for intussusception in children. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patient treated for intussusception at our institution between January 2006 and January 2013. Clinical features such as gender, age, seasonal variation, symptoms and signs, treatment results were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses including a chi-square test for categorical variables and logistic regression analysis were performed. During the study period, 356 patients were treated for intussusception. 328 (92.1%) was treated successfully by the non-operative pneumoreduction, and 28 (7.9%) required operative management. On univariate analysis, risk factors which were related to the need for operative treatment were age, vomiting, bloody stool, lethargy, and symptoms duration. A logistic regression analysis in order to assess for independent predictors of operative treatment was performed. Age (<6 vs > or =12 months) (OR 4.713, 95% CI 1.198~18.539, p=0.027) and symptoms duration longer than 48 hours (OR 4.534, 95% CI 1.846~11.137, p=0.001) were significantly associated with a requirement for operative treatment. We conclude that younger age and a longer duration of symptoms (> or =48 hours) are the independent risk factor related to the need for operative treatment for intussusception. Early surgical intervention or transfer to a hospital with pediatric surgical capabilities should be considered for patients with these findings.
Child* ; Humans ; Intussusception* ; Lethargy ; Logistic Models ; Medical Records ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors* ; Seasons ; Vomiting

PURPOSE: Pancreatic body/tail cancer often involves the celiac axis (CA) and it is regarded as an unresectable disease. To treat the disease, we employed distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) and reviewed our experiences. METHODS: We performed DP-CAR for seven patients with pancreatic body/tail cancer involving the CA. The indications of DP-CAR initially included tumors with definite invasion of CA and were later expanded to include borderline resectable disease. To determine the efficacy of DP-CAR, the clinico-pathological data of patients who underwent DP-CAR were compared to both distal pancreatectomy (DP) group and no resection (NR) group. RESULTS: The R0 resection rate was 71.4% and was not statistically different compared to DP group. The operative time (P = 0.018) and length of hospital stay (P = 0.022) were significantly longer in DP-CAR group but no significant difference was found in incidence of the postoperative pancreatic fistula compared to DP group. In DP-CAR group, focal hepatic infarction and transient hepatopathy occurred in 1 patient and 3 patients, respectively. No mortality occurred in DP-CAR group. The median survival time (MST) was not statistically different compared to DP group. However, the MST of DP-CAR group was significantly longer than that of NR group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our experience, DP-CAR was safe and offered high R0 resection rate for patients with pancreatic body/tail cancer with involvement of CA. The effect on survival of DP-CAR is comparable to DP and better than that of NR. However, the benefits need to be verified by further studies in the future.
Axis, Cervical Vertebra* ; Celiac Artery ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infarction ; Length of Stay ; Mortality ; Operative Time ; Pancreatectomy* ; Pancreatic Fistula ; Pancreatic Neoplasms ; Tail*

Following liver transplantation, a few reports have documented hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) after inferior vena cava (IVC) stenting for the treatment of IVC stenosis. However, HVOO occurred early after IVC stenting and was mostly associated with living donor liver transplantation. Here, we report a case of HVOO that occurred 31 months after IVC stenting in a man who received deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) using a modified piggyback (PB) technique. The cause of HVOO was unclear, but one possible explanation is that the balloon-expandable IVC stent might have compressed the IVC chamber on the donor liver side, which would have changed the outflow hemodynamics, resulting in intimal hyperplasia. Therefore, simultaneous hepatic venous stenting with IVC stent placement could help prevent HVOO in patients receiving DDLT with the modified PB technique.
Budd-Chiari Syndrome* ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hyperplasia ; Liver Transplantation* ; Liver* ; Living Donors ; Stents* ; Tissue Donors* ; Vena Cava, Inferior*

PURPOSE: Donor safety is the most important problem of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Although laparoscopic liver resection has gained popularity with increased surgical experience and the development of laparoscopes and specialized instruments, a totally laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy (LDRH) technique has not been investigated for efficacy and feasibility. We describe the experiences and outcomes associated with LDRH in adult-to-adult LDLT in order to assess the safety of the totally laparoscopic technique in donors. METHODS: Between May 2016 and July 2017, we performed hepatectomies in 22 living donors using a totally laparoscopic approach. Among them, 20 donors underwent LDRH. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records to ascertain donor safety and the reproducibility of LDRH; intra-operative and post-operative results including complications were demonstrated after performing LDRH. RESULTS: The median donor age was 29 years old and the median body mass index was 22.6 kg/m2. The actual graft weight was 710 g and graft weight/body weight (GRWR) was 1.125. No donors required blood transfusion, conversion to open surgery, or reoperation. The postoperative mortality was nil and postoperative complications were identified in two donors. One had fluid collection in the supra-pubic incision site for graft retrieval and the second had a minor bile leakage from the cutting edge of the right hepatic duct stump. All the liver function tests returned to normal ranges within one month. CONCLUSION: LDRH is a feasible operation owing to low blood loss and few complications. However, LDRH can be initially attempted after attaining sufficient experience in laparoscopic hepatectomy and LDLT techniques.
Bile ; Blood Transfusion ; Body Mass Index ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Hepatectomy ; Hepatic Duct, Common ; Humans ; Laparoscopes ; Liver ; Liver Function Tests ; Liver Transplantation ; Living Donors ; Medical Records ; Mortality ; Postoperative Complications ; Reference Values ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants