Chemotherapy-induced ototoxicity is a significant concern in pediatric patients with cancer, particularly those treated with platinum-based agents, such as cisplatin and carboplatin. This study reviewed its prevalence, risk factors, early diagnosis, and management strategies. A literature review was conducted to assess the effects of ototoxic chemotherapy, screening methods, and treatment approaches. Various grading scales and rehabilitation strategies were analyzed. Platinum-based chemotherapy causes ototoxic hearing loss in approximately 100% of cases, including high-frequency and delayed-onset losses. Younger age, higher cumulative dose, and cranial irradiation increased the risk. Screening adherence remains suboptimal, despite guidelines recommending early detection through high-frequency audiometry. Sodium thiosulfate may reduce ototoxicity in nonmetastatic cases. If appropriate, hearing aids and cochlear implants can support communication and language development. Ototoxic hearing loss is a prevalent, yet underdiagnosed, complication of pediatric cancer treatment. Standardized screening, otoprotective strategies, and early rehabilitation are essential to minimize their impact on language and quality of life. Greater awareness and national guidelines are required to improve the care of pediatric cancer survivors.

Chemotherapy-induced ototoxicity is a significant concern in pediatric patients with cancer, particularly those treated with platinum-based agents, such as cisplatin and carboplatin. This study reviewed its prevalence, risk factors, early diagnosis, and management strategies. A literature review was conducted to assess the effects of ototoxic chemotherapy, screening methods, and treatment approaches. Various grading scales and rehabilitation strategies were analyzed. Platinum-based chemotherapy causes ototoxic hearing loss in approximately 100% of cases, including high-frequency and delayed-onset losses. Younger age, higher cumulative dose, and cranial irradiation increased the risk. Screening adherence remains suboptimal, despite guidelines recommending early detection through high-frequency audiometry. Sodium thiosulfate may reduce ototoxicity in nonmetastatic cases. If appropriate, hearing aids and cochlear implants can support communication and language development. Ototoxic hearing loss is a prevalent, yet underdiagnosed, complication of pediatric cancer treatment. Standardized screening, otoprotective strategies, and early rehabilitation are essential to minimize their impact on language and quality of life. Greater awareness and national guidelines are required to improve the care of pediatric cancer survivors.

Chemotherapy-induced ototoxicity is a significant concern in pediatric patients with cancer, particularly those treated with platinum-based agents, such as cisplatin and carboplatin. This study reviewed its prevalence, risk factors, early diagnosis, and management strategies. A literature review was conducted to assess the effects of ototoxic chemotherapy, screening methods, and treatment approaches. Various grading scales and rehabilitation strategies were analyzed. Platinum-based chemotherapy causes ototoxic hearing loss in approximately 100% of cases, including high-frequency and delayed-onset losses. Younger age, higher cumulative dose, and cranial irradiation increased the risk. Screening adherence remains suboptimal, despite guidelines recommending early detection through high-frequency audiometry. Sodium thiosulfate may reduce ototoxicity in nonmetastatic cases. If appropriate, hearing aids and cochlear implants can support communication and language development. Ototoxic hearing loss is a prevalent, yet underdiagnosed, complication of pediatric cancer treatment. Standardized screening, otoprotective strategies, and early rehabilitation are essential to minimize their impact on language and quality of life. Greater awareness and national guidelines are required to improve the care of pediatric cancer survivors.

Objectives: . The recent expansion of eligibility for cochlear implantation (CI) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to include infants as young as 9 months has reignited debates concerning the clinically appropriate cut-off age for pediatric CI. Our study compared the early postoperative trajectories of receptive and expressive language development in children who received CI before 9 months of age with those who received it between 9 and 12 months. This study involved a unique pediatric cohort with documented etiology, where the timing of CI was based on objective criteria and efforts were made to minimize the influence of parental socioeconomic status. Methods: . A retrospective review of 98 pediatric implantees recruited at a tertiary referral center was conducted. The timing of CI was based on auditory and language criteria focused on the extent of delay corresponding to the bottom 1st percentile of language development among age-matched controls, with patients categorized into very early (CI at <9 months), early (CI at 9–12 months) and delayed (CI at 12–18 months) CI groups. Postoperative receptive/expressive language development was assessed using the Sequenced Language Scale for Infants receptive and expressive standardized scores and percentiles. Results: . Only the very early CI group showed significant improvements in receptive language starting at 3 months post-CI, aligning with normal-hearing peers by 9 months and maintaining this level until age 2 years. During this period (<2 years), all improvements were more pronounced in receptive language than in expressive language. Conclusion . CI before 9 months of age significantly improved receptive language development compared to later CI, with improvements sustained at least up to the age of 2. This study supports the consideration of earlier CI, beyond pediatric Food and Drug Administration labeling criteria (>9 months), in children with profound deafness who have a clear deafness etiology and language development delays (<1st percentile).