Objective:To evaluate the clinical value of radioactive nuclide strontium chloride (89SrCl2) combined with 99Tc-MDP in treating patients with breast cancer and osseous metastasis. Methods:A total of 80 patients with breast cancer and experiencing bone pain from osseous metastasis were randomly categorized into three groups. 22 patients were treated with 99Tc-MDP (99Tc-MDP group), 30 were treated with 89SrCl2 (89SrCl2 group), and 28 were treated with the combination therapy of 89SrCl2 and 99Tc-MDP (combination group). The analgesic effect, remission of bone metastases, and quality of life of patients in the three groups were observed before and after treatment. Side effect was also monitored. Results:In the combination group, the overall pain relief rate and the increase rate of life quality score were 92.9%(26/28) and 78.6%(22/28), respectively. The combination group was statistically significantly different from the two single-treatment groups (P<0.05). The effective rate of metastatic lesions was 46.4%(13/28) in the combination group, which was significantly higher than that in the 99Tc-MDP group (18.2%, 4/22;P<0.05). The effective rate of metastatic lesions was not significantly different between the combination and 89SrCl2 groups (33.3%, 10/30) (P>0.05). Conclusion:The treatment of 89SrCl2 com-bined with 99Tc-MDP can increase the analgesic effect and significantly improve the curative effect without overt side effects in patients with breast cancer and bone metastasis.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of simultaneous hybrid carotid artery stenting and off-pump coronary artery bypass in the treatment of coronary artery disease associated with serious carotid artery stenosis.Methods From January 2008 to December 2010,30 consecutive patients of CAD associated with serious carotid artery stenosis underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass.Fifteen patients received the hybrid revascularization by carotid artery stenting,immediately followed by off-pump coronary artery bypass and 15 consecutive patients underwent staged carotid artery stenting and off-pump coronary artery bypass.ResultsRevascularization was successful in all 30 patients ( 100％ ).There were no procedure-related complications and no in-hospital death for both procedures.Although the postoperative courses were uneventful with the exception of 2 patients who suffered from strokes,no vital organ dysfunction occurred.In the staged group,atrial fibrillation,acute renal inefficiency and reoperation for bleeding occurred each in 1 patient,respectively.There was no significant difference in the ventilation time [(31.7 ± 27.8 ) h vs ( 17.9 ± 7.06 ) h,P =0.073],intensive care unit stay [( 87.7 ± 61.6 ) vs (52.3 ± 80.8) h,P=0.189],and the volume of chest drainage [(945 ±260) ml vs (764 ±334) ml,P =0.109] between the hybrid revascularization and staged procedure groups.There was a shorter hospital stay after CAS of patients undergoing hybrid CAS-OPCAB compared with staged CAS-OPCAB [(9.7 ± 3.3 ) vs ( 17.1 ± 6.9 ) days,P =0.001].Conclusion For patients with both carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery disease,simultaneous hybrid or staged revascularization by carotid artery stenting,followed with off-pump coronary artery bypass,are feasible,safe,and less invasive therapeutic strategies.Both procedures do not influence the liver and renal function.Besides,no significant difference exists in the volume of chest drainage,ICU stay,respirator time,and between the staged and hybrid procedures.Compared with staged CAS-OPCAB the patients undergoing hybrid CAS-OPCAB strategy needs a shorter postoperative hospital stay time and decreases the total hospitalization cost at hospital.Further investigation are warranted to study its long-term efficacy.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the risk factors and sonographic variables that could be integrated into a predictive model for endometrial cancer (EC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) in women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 1837 patients who presented with AUB and underwent endometrial sampling. Multivariable logistic regression was developed based on clinical and sonographic covariates [endometrial thickness (ET), resistance index (RI) of the endometrial vasculature] assessed for their association with EC/AEH in the development group (n=1369), and a predictive nomogram was proposed. The model was validated in 468 patients. Results: Histological examination revealed 167 patients (12.2%) with EC or AEH in the development group. Using multivariable logistic regression, the following variables were incorporated in the prediction of endometrial malignancy: metabolic diseases [odds ratio (OR)=7.764, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 5.042–11.955], family history (OR=3.555, 95% CI 1.055–11.971), age ≥40 years (OR=3.195, 95% CI 1.878–5.435), RI ≤0.5 (OR=8.733, 95% CI 4.311–17.692), and ET ≥10 mm (OR=8.479, 95% CI 5.440–13.216). :A nomogram was created using these five variables with an area under the curve of 0.837 (95% CI 0.800–0.874). The calibration curve showed good agreement between the observed and predicted occurrences. For the validation group, the model provided acceptable discrimination and calibration. Conclusion The proposed nomogram model showed moderate prediction accuracy in the differentiation between benign and malignant endometrial lesions among women with AUB.

Objective:To investigate the efficacy of liver wedge resection and liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy for T2 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC).Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 168 patients who underwent radical resection of T2 GBC in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University from January 2011 to December 2021 were collected. There were 59 males and 109 females, aged (65±10)years. Of 168 patients, there were 112 cases in T2a stage and 56 cases in T2b stage. Of 112 patients in T2a stage, 73 cases underwent liver wedge resection and 39 cases underwent liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy. Of 56 patients in T2b stage, 27 cases underwent liver wedge resection and 29 cases underwent liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmen-tectomy. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and measure-ment data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range). Count data were described as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rate and draw survival curve, and the Log-rank test was used for survival analysis. The COX proportional risk model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Results:(1) Clinical data analysis of patients undergoing different extent of hepatic resection for T2 GBC. There was no significant difference in gender, age, cholecystoli-thiasis, preoperative total bilirubin, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9, CA125, incidental GBC, perineural invasion, microvascular invasion, pathological differentiation, histopathological subtypes, N staging, TNM staging between patients with T2a and T2b GBC who underwent different extent of hepatic resection ( P>0.05). (2) Prognostic analysis of T2 GBC patients undergoing different extent of hepatic resection. The 1-, 3- and 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rates of T2 GBC patients undergoing liver wedge resection were 78.0%, 60.1% and 51.4%, respectively, versus 86.8%, 80.0% and 68.0% of T2 GBC patients undergoing liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy, showing a significant difference between them ( χ2 =5.205, P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative overall survival rates of T2 GBC patients undergoing liver wedge resection were 85.0%, 62.5%, and 55.1%, respectively, versus 92.6%, 81.6%, and 68.8% for T2 GBC patients undergoing liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy, showing a significant difference in cumulative overall survival rate between them ( χ2=4.351, P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rates of T2b GBC patients undergoing liver wedge resection were 70.4%, 45.9% and 39.2%, respectively, versus 89.7%, 71.3% and 54.0% of T2b GBC patients undergoing liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy, showing a significant difference between them ( χ2=5.047, P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative overall survival rates of T2b GBC patients undergoing liver wedge resection were 81.5%, 53.2%, and 41.0%, respectively, versus 89.7%, 77.0%, and 60.7% of T2b GBC patients undergoing liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy, showing no significant difference in cumulative overall survival rate between them ( χ2=4.014, P<0.05). (3) Analysis of factors influencing prognosis of patients undergoing radical resection for T2 GBC. Results of multivariate analysis showed that CA19-9>39.0 U/mL, perineural invasion, N1 and N2 stage were independent risk factors influencing disease-free survival time of patients undergoing radical resection for T2 GBC ( hazard ratio=2.736, 3.496, 2.638, 17.440, 95% confidence interval as 1.195-6.266, 1.213-10.073, 1.429-4.869, 8.362-36.374, P<0.05). Liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy was an independent protective factor influencing disease-free survival time of patients undergoing radical resection for T2 GBC ( hazard ratio=0.418, 95% confidence interval as 0.230-0.759, P<0.05). CA19-9 >39.0 U/mL, perineural invasion, ⅡB stage, ⅢB stage and ⅣB stage of TNM staging were independent risk factors influencing overall survival time of patients undergoing radical resection for T2 GBC ( hazard ratio=2.740, 3.210, 2.037, 3.439, 24.466, 95% confidence interval as 1.127-6.664, 1.049-9.819, 1.004-4.125, 1.730-6.846, 10.733-55.842, P<0.05). Liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy was an independent protective factor influencing overall survival time of patients undergoing radical resec-tion for T2 GBC ( hazard ratio=0.476, 95% confidence interval as 0.261-0.867, P<0.05). (4) Analysis of postoperative complications in patients undergoing different extent of hepatic resection for T2 GBC. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications of patients with T2a and T2b GBC undergoing liver wedge resection or liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Compared to liver wedge resection, liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy can effectively prolong the disease-free survival overall survival time of T2b GBC patients. There is no significant difference in the major complications. Liver Ⅳb and Ⅴ segmentectomy is an independent protective factor for prognosis of patients undergoing radical resection for T2 GBC.

Objective To explore and verify the prognostic value of endothelial cells in glioblastoma. Methods Through bioinformatics analysis of the TCGA and CGGA databases, we screened endothelial cell-related markers in GBM single-cell data according to a series of criteria. Moreover, univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to obtain and screen endothelial cell prognosis-related markers and construct endothelial cell-related prognostic risk score. qPCR experiments was used to verify the differences in the expression of prognostic markers in GBM tissues and peritumoral normal brain tissues. Kaplan-Meier method was used to construct the survival curve to identify the prognostic efficacy of the prognostic risk score. Results A total of 2 115 prognostic genes of glioblastoma (GBM) were screened. Among them, 1 494 was upregulated and 621 was downregulated. Seven groups of cells were obtained after GBM single-cell sequencing analysis, including AC-like tumor cells, endothelial cells, monocytes/macrophages, NB-like tumor cells, neurons, OC-like tumor cells, and OPC-like tumor cells. According to the differential genes of endothelial cells and the corresponding screening criteria, four genes (DUSP6, STC1, VWA1, and TM4SF1) were screened for risk-score construction. The expression of the target gene in GBM tissues and normal brain tissues around the tumor was significantly up-regulated detected by qPCR. The risk score=0.171*DUSP6+0.144*STC1+0.041*VWA1−0.004*TM4SF1. Conclusion The glioblastoma endothelial cells’ risk score determined in this study can preferably predict the prognosis of patients.