CAVH in continuous renal replacement therapy is often regarded as one of most important advances in intensive care medicine in recent years. CAVH has been used widely for patients with acute renal failure combined with cardiovascular instability, severe fluid overload, cerebral edema or hyper catabolism, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis, acute respiratory distress and cardiopulmonary bypass. The continuous renal replacement therapy has to be started early to prevent multi-organ dysfunction.
Hemofiltration ; Renal Replacement Therapy

No abstract available.
Critical Illness* ; Hemofiltration* ; Humans

No abstract available.
Child* ; Hemofiltration* ; Humans

No abstract available.
Child* ; Hemofiltration* ; Humans

No abstract available.
Acute Kidney Injury* ; Edema* ; Hemofiltration*

No abstract available.
Acute Kidney Injury* ; Edema* ; Hemofiltration*

Animals ; Bile ; Carps ; Hemofiltration ; Humans ; Poisoning ; therapy

OBJECTIVETo summary the treatment experience of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).

METHODSFrom January 1997 to March 2009, a total of 1033 patients suffered SAP were admitted with a mean APACHE II score 12.0 +/- 4.3. There were 622 males and 411 females, aged from 13 to 98 years old. All patients were cared by the multidisciplinary team with intensivist, endoscopists, gastroenterologists, radiologist, nephrologist and surgeons.Patients treated in SICU in the early phase of the disease. In these 1033 patients, 365 cases received mechanical ventilation, 218 with tracheotomy, 159 cases received high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), 179 received nasobiliary drainage, 513 were treated with early enteral nutrition. CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainge for peripancreatic fluid collection was pefromed for 477 times and 438 patients received surgical debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis.

RESULTSIn all these 1033 cases, 975 patients (94.4%) survived, and 38 patients died (3.7%). The mortality of patients who received surgical debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis was 7.1% (31/438).

CONCLUSIONThe muti-discipline management of severe acute pancreatitis can remarkably improve the prognosis of patients.

Acute Kidney Injury ; therapy ; Child ; Hemofiltration ; methods ; Humans

OBJECTIVETo discuss the rationale, hypothesis, modality of extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) techniques for the critically ill animal models or patients, and to summarize the experimental and clinical studies with inconsistent data which explored the EBP's efficacy in the areas of critical care medicine.

DATA SOURCESArticles referred in this review were collected from the database of PubMed published in English up to June 2014.

STUDY SELECTIONWe had done a literature search by using the term "(sepsis OR acute lung injury OR acute respiratory distress syndrome) AND (extracorporeal blood purification OR hemofiltration OR hemoperfusion OR plasma exchange OR plasmapheresis OR adsorpiton)". Related original or review articles were included and carefully analyzed.

RESULTSAcute cellular and humoral immune disturbances occur in both sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Treatments aimed at targeting one single pro-/anti-inflammatory mediator have largely failed with no proven clinical benefits. Such failure shifts the therapeutic rationale to the nonspecific, broad-spectrum methods for modulating the over-activated inflammatory and anti-inflammatory response. Therefore, EBP techniques have become the potential weapons with high promise for removing the circulating pro-/anti-inflammatory mediators and promoting immune reconstitution. Over the years, multiple extracorporeal techniques for the critically ill animal models or patients have been developed, including hemofiltration (HF), high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF), high-cutoff hemofiltration (HCO-HF), hemo-perfusion or -adsorption (HP/HA), coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA), and plasma exchange (PE). These previous studies showed that EBP therapy was feasible and safe for the critically ill animal models or patients. However, data on their efficacy (especially on the clinical benefits, such as mortality) were inconsistent.

CONCLUSIONSIt is not now to conclude that EBP intervention can purify septic or ARDS patients with high clinical efficacy from current experimental and clinical practice. Prospective, randomized controlled, and well-designed clinical or experimental studies and most suitable EBP modalities should be further developed.