1.Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Pediatric Patients following Liver Transplantation
Thorben PAPE ; Ulrich BAUMANN ; Eva-Doreen PFISTER ; Florian W.R. VONDRAN ; Nicolas RICHTER ; Jens DINGEMANN ; Anna M HUNKEMÖLLER ; Tabea von GARREL ; Heiner WEDEMEYER ; Andrea SCHNEIDER ; Henrike LENZEN ; Klaus STAHL
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2025;28(2):113-123
Purpose:
Cholestatic complications remain a primary cause of post-liver transplantation (LTX) morbidity in pediatric patients. Standard biliary access by endoscopic retrograde cholangioscopy may not be feasible due to modified biliary drainage. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTCD) may be performed alternatively. However, systematic data concerning safety and efficacy of PTCD in these patients are scarce.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, procedural and safety characteristics of PTCD in pediatric patients following LTX were analyzed. We compared laboratory indicators of inflammation, cholestasis, and graft function before and at 6 and 12 months after the first PTCD insertion. Efficacy was analyzed by percentage of patients without cholangitis, need for surgical biliary re-intervention and re-transplantation during a follow-up period of 60 months.
Results:
Over a decade, PTCD was attempted in a total of 15 patients, with technical success (93.3%) in 14 patients. Periprocedural complications, including bleeding (7.1%) and cholangitis (21.4%) were observed in patients. During follow-up, both MELD-score (baseline:13 [8–15] vs. 12 months: 8 [7–8], p<0.001) and parameters of cholestasis (GGT: baseline: 286 [47–458] U/L vs. 12 months: 105 [26–147] U/L, p=0.024) decreased. Prior to PTCD, cholangitis (64.3%) and cholangiosepsis (21.4%) were common complications. In contrast, following PTCD, cholangitis occurred in only one patient (7.1%). Five patients (35.7%) needed surgical biliary re-intervention and two (14.3%) required re-transplantation.
Conclusion
PTCD in pediatric patients following LTX had an acceptable safety profile, demonstrating a biochemical improvement of both cholestasis and graft function and may prevent cholestatic complications, thus reducing the need for surgical re-intervention and re-transplantation.
2.Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Pediatric Patients following Liver Transplantation
Thorben PAPE ; Ulrich BAUMANN ; Eva-Doreen PFISTER ; Florian W.R. VONDRAN ; Nicolas RICHTER ; Jens DINGEMANN ; Anna M HUNKEMÖLLER ; Tabea von GARREL ; Heiner WEDEMEYER ; Andrea SCHNEIDER ; Henrike LENZEN ; Klaus STAHL
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2025;28(2):113-123
Purpose:
Cholestatic complications remain a primary cause of post-liver transplantation (LTX) morbidity in pediatric patients. Standard biliary access by endoscopic retrograde cholangioscopy may not be feasible due to modified biliary drainage. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTCD) may be performed alternatively. However, systematic data concerning safety and efficacy of PTCD in these patients are scarce.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, procedural and safety characteristics of PTCD in pediatric patients following LTX were analyzed. We compared laboratory indicators of inflammation, cholestasis, and graft function before and at 6 and 12 months after the first PTCD insertion. Efficacy was analyzed by percentage of patients without cholangitis, need for surgical biliary re-intervention and re-transplantation during a follow-up period of 60 months.
Results:
Over a decade, PTCD was attempted in a total of 15 patients, with technical success (93.3%) in 14 patients. Periprocedural complications, including bleeding (7.1%) and cholangitis (21.4%) were observed in patients. During follow-up, both MELD-score (baseline:13 [8–15] vs. 12 months: 8 [7–8], p<0.001) and parameters of cholestasis (GGT: baseline: 286 [47–458] U/L vs. 12 months: 105 [26–147] U/L, p=0.024) decreased. Prior to PTCD, cholangitis (64.3%) and cholangiosepsis (21.4%) were common complications. In contrast, following PTCD, cholangitis occurred in only one patient (7.1%). Five patients (35.7%) needed surgical biliary re-intervention and two (14.3%) required re-transplantation.
Conclusion
PTCD in pediatric patients following LTX had an acceptable safety profile, demonstrating a biochemical improvement of both cholestasis and graft function and may prevent cholestatic complications, thus reducing the need for surgical re-intervention and re-transplantation.
3.Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Pediatric Patients following Liver Transplantation
Thorben PAPE ; Ulrich BAUMANN ; Eva-Doreen PFISTER ; Florian W.R. VONDRAN ; Nicolas RICHTER ; Jens DINGEMANN ; Anna M HUNKEMÖLLER ; Tabea von GARREL ; Heiner WEDEMEYER ; Andrea SCHNEIDER ; Henrike LENZEN ; Klaus STAHL
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2025;28(2):113-123
Purpose:
Cholestatic complications remain a primary cause of post-liver transplantation (LTX) morbidity in pediatric patients. Standard biliary access by endoscopic retrograde cholangioscopy may not be feasible due to modified biliary drainage. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTCD) may be performed alternatively. However, systematic data concerning safety and efficacy of PTCD in these patients are scarce.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, procedural and safety characteristics of PTCD in pediatric patients following LTX were analyzed. We compared laboratory indicators of inflammation, cholestasis, and graft function before and at 6 and 12 months after the first PTCD insertion. Efficacy was analyzed by percentage of patients without cholangitis, need for surgical biliary re-intervention and re-transplantation during a follow-up period of 60 months.
Results:
Over a decade, PTCD was attempted in a total of 15 patients, with technical success (93.3%) in 14 patients. Periprocedural complications, including bleeding (7.1%) and cholangitis (21.4%) were observed in patients. During follow-up, both MELD-score (baseline:13 [8–15] vs. 12 months: 8 [7–8], p<0.001) and parameters of cholestasis (GGT: baseline: 286 [47–458] U/L vs. 12 months: 105 [26–147] U/L, p=0.024) decreased. Prior to PTCD, cholangitis (64.3%) and cholangiosepsis (21.4%) were common complications. In contrast, following PTCD, cholangitis occurred in only one patient (7.1%). Five patients (35.7%) needed surgical biliary re-intervention and two (14.3%) required re-transplantation.
Conclusion
PTCD in pediatric patients following LTX had an acceptable safety profile, demonstrating a biochemical improvement of both cholestasis and graft function and may prevent cholestatic complications, thus reducing the need for surgical re-intervention and re-transplantation.
4.Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Pediatric Patients following Liver Transplantation
Thorben PAPE ; Ulrich BAUMANN ; Eva-Doreen PFISTER ; Florian W.R. VONDRAN ; Nicolas RICHTER ; Jens DINGEMANN ; Anna M HUNKEMÖLLER ; Tabea von GARREL ; Heiner WEDEMEYER ; Andrea SCHNEIDER ; Henrike LENZEN ; Klaus STAHL
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2025;28(2):113-123
Purpose:
Cholestatic complications remain a primary cause of post-liver transplantation (LTX) morbidity in pediatric patients. Standard biliary access by endoscopic retrograde cholangioscopy may not be feasible due to modified biliary drainage. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTCD) may be performed alternatively. However, systematic data concerning safety and efficacy of PTCD in these patients are scarce.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, procedural and safety characteristics of PTCD in pediatric patients following LTX were analyzed. We compared laboratory indicators of inflammation, cholestasis, and graft function before and at 6 and 12 months after the first PTCD insertion. Efficacy was analyzed by percentage of patients without cholangitis, need for surgical biliary re-intervention and re-transplantation during a follow-up period of 60 months.
Results:
Over a decade, PTCD was attempted in a total of 15 patients, with technical success (93.3%) in 14 patients. Periprocedural complications, including bleeding (7.1%) and cholangitis (21.4%) were observed in patients. During follow-up, both MELD-score (baseline:13 [8–15] vs. 12 months: 8 [7–8], p<0.001) and parameters of cholestasis (GGT: baseline: 286 [47–458] U/L vs. 12 months: 105 [26–147] U/L, p=0.024) decreased. Prior to PTCD, cholangitis (64.3%) and cholangiosepsis (21.4%) were common complications. In contrast, following PTCD, cholangitis occurred in only one patient (7.1%). Five patients (35.7%) needed surgical biliary re-intervention and two (14.3%) required re-transplantation.
Conclusion
PTCD in pediatric patients following LTX had an acceptable safety profile, demonstrating a biochemical improvement of both cholestasis and graft function and may prevent cholestatic complications, thus reducing the need for surgical re-intervention and re-transplantation.
5.Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Pediatric Patients following Liver Transplantation
Thorben PAPE ; Ulrich BAUMANN ; Eva-Doreen PFISTER ; Florian W.R. VONDRAN ; Nicolas RICHTER ; Jens DINGEMANN ; Anna M HUNKEMÖLLER ; Tabea von GARREL ; Heiner WEDEMEYER ; Andrea SCHNEIDER ; Henrike LENZEN ; Klaus STAHL
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2025;28(2):113-123
Purpose:
Cholestatic complications remain a primary cause of post-liver transplantation (LTX) morbidity in pediatric patients. Standard biliary access by endoscopic retrograde cholangioscopy may not be feasible due to modified biliary drainage. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTCD) may be performed alternatively. However, systematic data concerning safety and efficacy of PTCD in these patients are scarce.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, procedural and safety characteristics of PTCD in pediatric patients following LTX were analyzed. We compared laboratory indicators of inflammation, cholestasis, and graft function before and at 6 and 12 months after the first PTCD insertion. Efficacy was analyzed by percentage of patients without cholangitis, need for surgical biliary re-intervention and re-transplantation during a follow-up period of 60 months.
Results:
Over a decade, PTCD was attempted in a total of 15 patients, with technical success (93.3%) in 14 patients. Periprocedural complications, including bleeding (7.1%) and cholangitis (21.4%) were observed in patients. During follow-up, both MELD-score (baseline:13 [8–15] vs. 12 months: 8 [7–8], p<0.001) and parameters of cholestasis (GGT: baseline: 286 [47–458] U/L vs. 12 months: 105 [26–147] U/L, p=0.024) decreased. Prior to PTCD, cholangitis (64.3%) and cholangiosepsis (21.4%) were common complications. In contrast, following PTCD, cholangitis occurred in only one patient (7.1%). Five patients (35.7%) needed surgical biliary re-intervention and two (14.3%) required re-transplantation.
Conclusion
PTCD in pediatric patients following LTX had an acceptable safety profile, demonstrating a biochemical improvement of both cholestasis and graft function and may prevent cholestatic complications, thus reducing the need for surgical re-intervention and re-transplantation.
6.Insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt leads to sustained reversal of systemic inflammation in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis
Anja TIEDE ; Lena STOCKHOFF ; Zhaoli LIU ; Hannah RIELAND ; Jim B. MAUZ ; Valerie OHLENDORF ; Birgit BREMER ; Jennifer WITT ; Anke KRAFT ; Markus CORNBERG ; Jan B. HINRICHS ; Bernhard C. MEYER ; Heiner WEDEMEYER ; Cheng-Jian XU ; Christine S. FALK ; Benjamin MAASOUMY
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2025;31(1):240-255
Background/Aims:
Systemic Inflammation (SI) is considered a key mechanism in disease progression and development of complications in decompensated liver cirrhosis. SI is mainly driven by portal hypertension and bacterial translocation. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion represents an effective treatment for portal hypertension. This study aims to investigate the impact of TIPS insertion on SI and bacterial translocation.
Methods:
We prospectively included 59 cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS insertion. Blood samples were collected at TIPS insertion and follow-up (FU) 1, 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter. At all time points, we performed a comprehensive analysis of SI including 43 soluble inflammatory markers (SIMs), and surrogates of bacterial translocation (sCD14, sCD163). To investigate long-term kinetics of SI, C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cells (WBC) were retrospectively analyzed in a cohort of 177 patients up to 3 years after TIPS insertion.
Results:
At TIPS insertion, 30/43 SIMs, sCD14, and sCD163 measured significantly higher in cirrhotic patients compared to healthy controls. By FU6 25 SIMs and sCD14 measured at significantly lower levels compared to baseline. Interestingly, in patients with TIPS indication of refractory ascites, IL-6 decreased to levels documented in earlier stages of cirrhosis. In long-term follow-up, CRP levels significantly decreased after TIPS insertion, which translated into lower mortality in Cox regression analysis (HR 0.968, p=0.042). Notably, patients with residual ascites post-TIPS showed significantly higher CRP and IL-6 levels across all follow-ups compared to patients with resolved ascites.
Conclusions
Decreasing portal hypertension via TIPS insertion leads to a significant attenuation of SI and bacterial translocation over time.
7.Insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt leads to sustained reversal of systemic inflammation in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis
Anja TIEDE ; Lena STOCKHOFF ; Zhaoli LIU ; Hannah RIELAND ; Jim B. MAUZ ; Valerie OHLENDORF ; Birgit BREMER ; Jennifer WITT ; Anke KRAFT ; Markus CORNBERG ; Jan B. HINRICHS ; Bernhard C. MEYER ; Heiner WEDEMEYER ; Cheng-Jian XU ; Christine S. FALK ; Benjamin MAASOUMY
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2025;31(1):240-255
Background/Aims:
Systemic Inflammation (SI) is considered a key mechanism in disease progression and development of complications in decompensated liver cirrhosis. SI is mainly driven by portal hypertension and bacterial translocation. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion represents an effective treatment for portal hypertension. This study aims to investigate the impact of TIPS insertion on SI and bacterial translocation.
Methods:
We prospectively included 59 cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS insertion. Blood samples were collected at TIPS insertion and follow-up (FU) 1, 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter. At all time points, we performed a comprehensive analysis of SI including 43 soluble inflammatory markers (SIMs), and surrogates of bacterial translocation (sCD14, sCD163). To investigate long-term kinetics of SI, C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cells (WBC) were retrospectively analyzed in a cohort of 177 patients up to 3 years after TIPS insertion.
Results:
At TIPS insertion, 30/43 SIMs, sCD14, and sCD163 measured significantly higher in cirrhotic patients compared to healthy controls. By FU6 25 SIMs and sCD14 measured at significantly lower levels compared to baseline. Interestingly, in patients with TIPS indication of refractory ascites, IL-6 decreased to levels documented in earlier stages of cirrhosis. In long-term follow-up, CRP levels significantly decreased after TIPS insertion, which translated into lower mortality in Cox regression analysis (HR 0.968, p=0.042). Notably, patients with residual ascites post-TIPS showed significantly higher CRP and IL-6 levels across all follow-ups compared to patients with resolved ascites.
Conclusions
Decreasing portal hypertension via TIPS insertion leads to a significant attenuation of SI and bacterial translocation over time.
8.Insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt leads to sustained reversal of systemic inflammation in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis
Anja TIEDE ; Lena STOCKHOFF ; Zhaoli LIU ; Hannah RIELAND ; Jim B. MAUZ ; Valerie OHLENDORF ; Birgit BREMER ; Jennifer WITT ; Anke KRAFT ; Markus CORNBERG ; Jan B. HINRICHS ; Bernhard C. MEYER ; Heiner WEDEMEYER ; Cheng-Jian XU ; Christine S. FALK ; Benjamin MAASOUMY
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2025;31(1):240-255
Background/Aims:
Systemic Inflammation (SI) is considered a key mechanism in disease progression and development of complications in decompensated liver cirrhosis. SI is mainly driven by portal hypertension and bacterial translocation. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion represents an effective treatment for portal hypertension. This study aims to investigate the impact of TIPS insertion on SI and bacterial translocation.
Methods:
We prospectively included 59 cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS insertion. Blood samples were collected at TIPS insertion and follow-up (FU) 1, 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter. At all time points, we performed a comprehensive analysis of SI including 43 soluble inflammatory markers (SIMs), and surrogates of bacterial translocation (sCD14, sCD163). To investigate long-term kinetics of SI, C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cells (WBC) were retrospectively analyzed in a cohort of 177 patients up to 3 years after TIPS insertion.
Results:
At TIPS insertion, 30/43 SIMs, sCD14, and sCD163 measured significantly higher in cirrhotic patients compared to healthy controls. By FU6 25 SIMs and sCD14 measured at significantly lower levels compared to baseline. Interestingly, in patients with TIPS indication of refractory ascites, IL-6 decreased to levels documented in earlier stages of cirrhosis. In long-term follow-up, CRP levels significantly decreased after TIPS insertion, which translated into lower mortality in Cox regression analysis (HR 0.968, p=0.042). Notably, patients with residual ascites post-TIPS showed significantly higher CRP and IL-6 levels across all follow-ups compared to patients with resolved ascites.
Conclusions
Decreasing portal hypertension via TIPS insertion leads to a significant attenuation of SI and bacterial translocation over time.