Objectives: ：To describe the differences in long-term outcomes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients according to initial dementia severity. Methods: ：A retrospective chart review of AD patients from a dementia clinic at the University Hospital in Korea was conducted from April 2010 to March 2017. There were 168 patients enrolled, who were divided into three groups based on initial Clinical Dementing Rating (CDR). There were 55 in the very mild group (CDR=0.5 ; mean age 80.64±6.57), 93 in the mild group (CDR=1 ; mean age 80.57±7.28) and 20 in the moderate group (CDR=2 ; mean age 83.00±9.07). Participants were treated with donepezil±memantine. The observation period was 2.44±0.50 years. Cognitive function and severity of dementia were initially assessed by the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (CERAD-NP) and were annually assessed by Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), CDR and CDR-Sum of boxes (CDR-SB). Results: ：The annual decline rate of MMSE score was -0.82 and those of very mild, mild, moderate groups were -0.63, -0.80, -1.96 respectively, while the annual change in CDR-SB score was 0.98, very mild group 0.86, mild group 1.03, moderate group 1.26. Education level, male, initial CDR were found to be significant potential factors in the annual change in MMSE, while initial CDR was a significant potential factor in the annual change in CDR-SB. Conclusion ：It is meaningful that we studied long-term outcomes of anti-dementia medications in real-world clinical setting. The higher the initial severity of AD, the higher the cognitive decline rate.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progressively inflicts impairment of synaptic functions with notable deposition of amyloid-β (Aβ) as senile plaques within the extracellular space of the brain. Accordingly, therapeutic directions for AD have focused on clearing Aβ plaques or preventing amyloidogenesis based on the amyloid cascade hypothesis. However, the emerging evidence suggests that Aβ serves biological roles, which include suppressing microbial infections, regulating synaptic plasticity, promoting recovery after brain injury, sealing leaks in the blood-brain barrier, and possibly inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells. More importantly, these functions were found in in vitro and in vivo investigations in a hormetic manner, that is to be neuroprotective at low concentrations and pathological at high concentrations. We herein summarize the physiological roles of monomeric Aβ and current Aβ-directed therapies in clinical trials. Based on the evidence, we propose that novel therapeutics targeting Aβ should selectively target Aβ in neurotoxic forms such as oligomers while retaining monomeric Aβ in order to preserve the physiological functions of Aβ monomers.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health and socio-economic problem, resulting in significant disability and mortality. Malnutrition is common in TBI patients and is associated with increased vulnerability to infection, higher morbidity and mortality rates, as well as longer stays in the intensive care unit and hospital. Following TBI, various pathophysiological mechanisms, such as hypermetabolism and hypercatabolism, affect patient outcomes. It is crucial to provide adequate nutrition therapy to prevent secondary brain damage and promote optimal recovery. This review includes a literature review and discusses the challenges encountered in clinical practice regarding nutrition in TBI patients.The focus is on determining energy requirements, timing and methods of nutrition delivery, promoting enteral tolerance, providing enteral nutrition to patients receiving vasopressors, and implementing trophic enteral nutrition. Enhancing our understanding of the current evidence regarding appropriate nutrition practices will contribute to improving overall outcomes for TBI patients.

Decompressive craniectomy (DCE) and cranioplasty (CP) are surgical procedures used to manage elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in various clinical scenarios, including ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and traumatic brain injury. The physiological changes following DCE, such as cerebral blood flow, perfusion, brain tissue oxygenation, and autoregulation, are essential for understanding the benefits and limitations of these procedures. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to systematically review the recent updates in DCE and CP, focusing on the fundamentals of DCE for ICP reduction, indications for DCE, optimal sizes and timing for DCE and CP, the syndrome of trephined, and the debate on suboccipital CP. The review highlights the need for further research on hemodynamic and metabolic indicators following DCE, particularly in relation to the pressure reactivity index.It provides recommendations for early CP within three months of controlling increased ICP to facilitate neurological recovery. Additionally, the review emphasizes the importance of considering suboccipital CP in patients with persistent headaches, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or cerebellar sag after suboccipital craniectomy. A better understanding of the physiological effects, indications, complications, and management strategies for DCE and CP to control elevated ICP will help optimize patient outcomes and improve the overall effectiveness of these procedures.

No abstract available.
Hiccup* ; Myoclonus

No abstract available.
Hypertrophy ; Stroke

Objective: To evaluate the effect of perfluorobutane microbubbles (Sonazoid®, GE Healthcare) on steam popping duringradiofrequency (RF) ablation for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to assess whether popping affects treatmentoutcomes. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study, which included 90 consecutivepatients with single HCC, who received percutaneous RF ablation as the first-line treatment. The patients were divided intotwo groups, based on the presence or absence of the popping phenomenon, which was defined as an audible sound with asimultaneous sudden explosion within the ablation zone as detected via ultrasonography during the procedure. The factorscontributing to the popping phenomenon were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Local tumor progression(LTP) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test for performingcomparisons between the two groups. Results: The overall incidence of the popping phenomenon was 25.8% (24/93). Sonazoid® was used in 1 patient (4.2%) inthe popping group (n = 24), while it was used in 15 patients (21.7%) in the non-popping group (n = 69). Multivariableanalysis revealed that the use of Sonazoid® was the only significant factor for absence of the popping phenomenon (oddsratio = 0.10, p= 0.048). There were no significant differences in cumulative LTP and DFS between the two groups (p= 0.479and p= 0.424, respectively). Conclusion The use of Sonazoid® has a suppressive effect on the popping phenomenon during RF ablation in patients withHCC. However, the presence of the popping phenomenon may not affect clinical outcomes.