PURPOSE: We analyzed to find out prognostic factors in the conservative treatment for the plantar fasciitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data were collected from 145 patients, 159 feet (M:F = 51:108) with conservative treatment and analyzed for possible prognostic factors : sex, age of onset, the duration of symptom before treatment, pain score before treatment, the duration for symptom remission, medication period, calcaneal pitch angle, and presence of calcaneal spur. RESULTS: The duration of symptom before conservative treatment is affected to the prognosis, and the borderline of the effective period was about 6 months. CONCLUSION: With the conservative treatment of the plantar fasciitis, we found that (1) the duration of symptom before the conservative treatment was a prognostic factor, and (2) if the period before the conservative treatment was more than 6 months, the other treatment option such as surgery should be considered for this chronic group.
Age of Onset ; Fasciitis, Plantar* ; Foot ; Heel Spur ; Humans ; Prognosis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sonographic findings of plantar fasciitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both feet of 30patients(mean age, 44years) in whom plantar fasciitis had been clinically diagnosed, and those of healthyvolunteers(mean age, 34years) were evaluated with ultrasound(US) using a 7.0MHz linear array transducer. Heel painwas unilateral in 26 patients and bilateral in four. Sagittal sonograms were obtained in the prone position, andthe thickness of the plantar fascia was measured at its proximal end near its insertion into the calcaneus. Wealso evaluated hypoechoic fascia, perifascial fluid collection, fiber rupture, calcaneal spur and calcifications. RESULTS: Plantar fascia thickness was significantly greater in the heels of patients with plantarfasciitis(3.2-8mm; mean, 5.1 +/-1.12) than in their asymptomatic heels(1.3-5mm; mean, 3.5 +/-0.78)(p<0.0001), inwhich it was similar to that of heels of patients in the control group(1.8-5mm; mean, 3.0 +/-0.71)(p<0.0001). Theproximal plantar fascia was hypoechoic in 31 symptomatic heels(91.2%), in four asymptomatic heels(15.4%), and innone of the patients in the control group. Calcaneal spurs were identified in sixteen symptomatic heels(47.1%),and in two which were asymptomatic(7.7%). Perifascial fluid collection was identified in only two symptomaticheels(5.9%). CONCLUSION: In plantar fasciitis, sonography demonstrates that the fascia is thicker as well ashypoechic. For the clinical diagnosis of planter fasciitis, US can therefore be used as an adjunct to clinicaldiagnosis.
Calcaneus ; Diagnosis ; Fascia ; Fasciitis ; Fasciitis, Plantar* ; Foot ; Heel ; Heel Spur ; Humans ; Prone Position ; Rupture ; Transducers ; Ultrasonography*

BACKGROUND: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the relationship between location of the rotator cuff tear and shape of the subacromial spur. METHODS: Totally, 80 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for partial thickness rotator cuff tear were enrolled for the study. Bigliani's type of the acromion, type of subacromial spur, and location of partial thickness tear of the rotator cuff were evaluated using plain X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging. We then compared the groups of no spur with spur, and heel with traction spur. RESULTS: Of the 80 cases, 25 cases comprised the no spur group, and 55 cases comprised the spur group. There was a significant difference in type of tear (p=0.0004) between these two groups. Bursal side tears were significantly greater (odds ratio=6.000, p=0.0007) in the spur group. Subjects belonging to the spur group were further divided into heel (38 cases) and traction spur (17 cases). Comparing these two groups revealed significant differences only in the type of tear (p=0.0001). Furthermore, the heel spur had significantly greater bursal side tear (odds ratio=29.521, p=0.0005) as compared to traction spur. CONCLUSIONS: The heel spur is more associated to bursal side tear than the traction spur, whereas the traction spur associates greater to the articular side tear.
Acromion ; Heel ; Heel Spur ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Osteophyte ; Rotator Cuff ; Tears ; Traction

OBJECTIVE: To know the clinically meaningful findings of ultrasonography in plantar fasciitis. METHOD: Thirty one feet of 24 patients who had clinical diagnosis of plantar fasciitis and 70 feet of 35 healthy volunteers were evaluated with ultrasound. Sagittal sonograms were obtained in the prone position, and the plantar fascia thickness (PFT) was measured at proximal end near its insertion into the calcaneus. Hypoechogenecity, perifascial fluid collection, tendon rupture, calcaneal spur and calcification were also evaluated. RESULTS: The plantar fascia thickness (PFT) of the symptomatic heels (SH) of patients group (4.83+/-0.86 mm) was significantly greater than that of their asymtomatic heels (ASH) (2.95+/-0.57 mm)(p<0.05) and it was also greater than that of control group (2.63+/-0.41 mm)(p<0.05). The range of difference of both PFT was 0.7~3.2 mm in patients group and 0~0.8 mm in control group. Hypoechogenecity was found in 22 SH (71%), perifascial fluid collection in 5 SH (16%) and calcification in 2 SH (6%). Calcaneal bony spur was identified in 7 SH (26%) on simple radiography. CONCLUSION: Increased thickness (>3.8 mm), difference of thickness between SH and ASH (>1.0 mm) and hypoecho genecity of plantar fascia were clinically meaningful ultrasonographic findings of plantar fasciitis, and ultrasonogrphy can be used as the inital imaging modality for the diagnosis.
Calcaneus ; Diagnosis ; Fascia ; Fasciitis, Plantar* ; Foot ; Healthy Volunteers ; Heel ; Heel Spur ; Humans ; Prone Position ; Radiography ; Rupture ; Tendons ; Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the appearances of plantar fasciitis by ultrasonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 48 cases of unilateral plantar fasciitis were enrolled in this study. Plain radiograph and real- time sonography of both feet were perfomred and the results were compared between the affected feet and controlateral symptomless feet. Calcaneal spur were observed on plain radiograph and thickness of plantar fascia, hypoechogenecity, blurring of border of plantar fascia, perifascial effusion, wavy plantar fascia were observed on sonography. RESULTS: Women (35 cases) and left feet (30 cases) were more frequent than men and right feet. Thickness of plantar fascia in affected site was thicker than normal site (p<0.01). Hypoechogenecity was observed only in 39 cases (81%) affected site, blurring of border of plantar fascia in affected site was 30 cases (62%) and 7 cases (15%) in normal site, perifascial effusion was observed only in 38 cases (79%) affected site, wavy plantar fascia in affected site was 43 cases (90%) and 2 cases (4%) in normal site. Calcaneal spur in affected site was 36 cases (75%) and 33 cases (69%) in normal site. CONCLUSION: Sonography is a useful diagnostic procedure for the plantar fasciitis especially in the unilateral plantar fasciitis.
Fascia ; Fasciitis, Plantar* ; Female ; Foot ; Heel Spur ; Humans ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography

The purpose of this study was to identify the biomechanical factors that correlate with plantar fasciitis in non-obese patients whose body mass index were below 25 kg/m2. The subjects were non-obese patients who were diagnosed as plantar fasciitis by clinical appearance, physical examination, and ultrasonographic findings (n=48), and non-obese control persons without clinical diagnosis of plantar fasciitis (n=30). The two groups were compared on fat pad thickness, ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM), resting calcaneal stance position (RCSP), incidence of calcaneal spur, and calcaneal pitch. The results showed that, there were statistically significant differences between two groups in ankle dorsiflexion ROM, RCSP, and calcaneal pitch (p<0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed ankle dorsiflexion ROM and RCSP strongly correlated with presence of plantar fasciitis as independent predictors (p<0.05). In conclusion, reduced ankle dorsiflexion ROM and negative RCSP (valgus tendency in rear foot) may be the biomechanical factors associated with plantar fasciitis in non-obese patients.
Adipose Tissue ; Animals ; Ankle ; Body Mass Index ; Fasciitis, Plantar ; Heel Spur ; Humans ; Incidence ; Logistic Models ; Physical Examination ; Range of Motion, Articular

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to investigate the causes of plantar heel pain and find differences in the clinical features of plantar fasciitis (PF) and fat pad atrophy (FPA), which are common causes of plantar heel pain, for use in differential diagnosis. METHOD: This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 250 patients with plantar heel pain at the Foot Clinic of Rehabilitation Medicine at Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital from January to September, 2008. RESULTS: The subjects used in this study were 114 men and 136 women patients with a mean age of 43.8 years and mean heel pain duration of 13.3 months. Causes of plantar heel pain were PF (53.2%), FPA (14.8%), pes cavus (10.4%), PF with FPA (9.2%), pes planus (4.8%), plantar fibromatosis (4.4%), plantar fascia rupture (1.6%), neuropathy (0.8%), and small shoe syndrome (0.8%). PF and FPA were most frequently diagnosed. First-step pain in the morning, and tenderness on medial calcaneal tuberosity correlated with PF. FPA mainly involved bilateral pain, pain at night, and pain that was aggravated by standing. Heel cord tightness was the most common biomechanical abnormality of the foot. Heel spur was frequently seen in X-rays of patients with PF. CONCLUSION: Plantar heel pain can be provoked by PF, FPA, and other causes. Patients with PF or FPA typically show different characteristics in clinical features. Plantar heel pain requires differential diagnosis for appropriate treatment.
Adipose Tissue ; Atrophy ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Fascia ; Fasciitis, Plantar ; Female ; Fibroma ; Flatfoot ; Foot ; Foot Deformities ; Heel ; Heel Spur ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Records ; Retrospective Studies ; Rupture ; Shoes

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect the treatment of arthroscopy-assisted calcaneal spur resection combined with plantar fascia release and calcaneal decompression in the treatment of the patients with intractable calcaneal pain. METHODS: The clinical data of 50 patients with intractable heel pain from January 2016 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 20 males and 30 females;aged from 40 to 68 years old with an average of (50.12±7.35)years old, the medical history ranged from 1 to 4 years. All patients underwent arthroscopy-assisted calcaneal spur resection combined with plantar fascia release and calcaneal decompression, and were followed up, the duration ranged from 24 to 60 months with an average of(42.00±3.28) months. All patients had obvious heel pain before surgery, and X-ray examinations often showed the presence of calcaneal spurs. In addition to the routine foot examination, the changes in the height and angle of the arch of the foot were also measured pre and post-operatively by X-ray, for the evaluation of clinical effect. The VAS system was used to evaluate the degree of foot pain;the AOFAS scoring system was used to comprehensively evaluate the foot pain, voluntary movement, gait and stability. RESULTS: The VAS decreased from (8.75±1.24) before surgery to (5.15±2.35) at 3 months after surgery, (4.07±2.53) at 6 months after surgery, and (3.95±2.44) at the last fllow-up(P<0.05). The AOFAS score increased from (53.46±4.17) before surgery to(92.46±2.53) at 3 months after surgery, (96.33±2.46) at 6 months after surgery, and (97.05±2.37) at the last follow-up(P<0.05). The arch height was (41.54±1.15) mm before operation and (41.49±1.09) mm after the operation, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). The internal arch angle of the foot arch was (121±6)° before operation and (122±7)° after operation. The difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). CONCLUSION Arthroscopy-assisted calcaneal bone spurs resection combined with plantar fascia release and calcaneal decompression exhibited great clinical effect for treating intractable heel.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Heel/surgery* ; Heel Spur/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Calcaneus/surgery* ; Foot Diseases ; Pain ; Endoscopes ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the characteristic morphology of heel spur, and to investigate the relationship of heel spur and plantar heel pain.

METHODSFrom June 2005 to April 2009, 210 cases (254 feet) with heel spur (according to Denis Pain Scale) were divided into cases group 1 (P2, n = 46), 2 (P3, n = 44), 3 (P4, n = 42), 4 (P5, n = 36) and controls group (P1, n = 42). Three-dimensional reconstruction of heel spur was performed in all groups using volume rendering based on multi-slice CT data by Super Image orthopedics edition 1.0. The characteristic morphology of heel spur was observed and the data were measured and analyzed, involving the width of basilar part, the length, the angle between heel spur and planta pedis, and the angle between the longitudinal axis of calcaneus and heel spur.

RESULTSParts of cases groups displayed coarse arcuate edge and undersurface with one or more little heel spurs adhere to heel spur, of which the numbers were greater than controls group, especially in cases group 4. No significant difference of the width of basilar part of heel spur was found among 5 groups (F = 2.32, P > 0.05). However, obvious difference was found in the length, the angle between heel spur and planta pedis, and the angle between the longitudinal axis of calcaneus and heel spur (F = 8.23, 6.82, 5.87, P < 0.05). Compared with the controls group, the angle between heel spur and planta pedis of cases groups had higher degrees, but the difference of the other data presented irregular.

CONCLUSIONSThe characteristic morphology of heel spur varies in patients associated with plantar heel pain. No correlation is found between the severity and the morphological data, including the width of basilar part, the length, the angle between heel spur and planta pedis, and the angle between the longitudinal axis of calcaneus and heel spur.

Aged ; Calcaneus ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Case-Control Studies ; Female ; Heel Spur ; complications ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

INTRODUCTIONThe objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of fl at insoles, bone spur pads, pre-fabricated orthotics and customised orthotics in reducing plantar contact pressure of subjects with plantar fasciitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODSThis is a controlled non-blinded comparative study conducted in a tertiary medical institute. Thirty subjects with unilateral plantar fasciitis between the ages of 20 and 65 years were recruited at the sports medicine clinic. The contact pressures and pressure distribution patterns in both feet for each subject were measured with sensor pressure mats while standing. Repeat measurements were made with the subjects wearing shoes, fl at insoles, bone spur heel pads, pre-fabricated insoles and customised orthotics on both feet. The asymptomatic side was used as the control. Contact pressure measurements of the symptomatic and asymptomatic feet and power ratio of the pressure distribution pattern of the rearfoot were then compared.

RESULTSContact pressure was higher on the asymptomatic side due to unequal distribution of weight. Bone spur heel pads were ineffective in reducing rearfoot pressure while formthotics and customised orthotics reduced peak rearfoot pressures significantly. The power ratio of the rearfoot region decreased with the use of formthotics and customised orthotics.

CONCLUSIONPre-fabricated orthotics and customised orthotics reduced rearfoot peak forces on both sides while bone spurs heel pad increase rearfoot peak pressures. Pre-fabricated and customised orthotics are useful in distributing pressure uniformly over the rearfoot region.

Adult ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Body Mass Index ; Chronic Disease ; Fasciitis, Plantar ; therapy ; Female ; Foot ; physiology ; Heel ; Heel Spur ; prevention & control ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthotic Devices ; Pain ; prevention & control ; Pain Measurement ; Pressure ; Young Adult