China ; epidemiology ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; Humans

OBJECTIVETo investigate and compare the short-term outcome of patients with low-middle frequency sudden deafness treated with alone or combination treatment.

METHODSFrom August 2007 to October 2011, 205 patients with the diagnosis of low-middle frequency sudden deafness who were from 33 different clinical centers were recruited. All patients were followed up for four weeks from the initial examination. Patients were treated with steroid , Ginaton, batroxobin respectively, or Ginaton and steroid combination treatment.

RESULTSThe total effective rate was 90.73%. In Ginaton group, the total effective rate was 87.27%, 89.19% in steroid group, 87.80% in batroxobin group, and 95.83% in Ginaton and steroid group. Considering the total effective rate, there was no statistical difference between four groups (χ(2) = 7.98, P = 0.54). The clinical cure rate for steroid alone was 81.01%, Ginaton alone 76.36%, batroxobin alone 68.29%, and Ginaton and steroid combination treatment 80.56%. There were no clinically significant differences between the different treatments (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSThe low-middle frequency sudden deafness tends to have a relatively favorable prognosis. The steroid played a good effect in the treatment. But different treatments either improving the microcirculation of inner ear or alleviating edema blood has undifferentiated results. Therefore the combination therapy may be more effective.

Batroxobin ; China ; epidemiology ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; classification ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; therapy ; Humans

Deafness ; Diabetes Complications ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; Diabetes Mellitus ; epidemiology ; Hearing Loss ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Humans

OBJECTIVERetrospectively analyzed the clinical data of sudden sensorineural hearing loss with acoustic neuroma.

METHODSThe clinical data of 467 cases with sudden sensorineural hearing loss were collected between Jan, 2008 and Aug, 2012. Discussed the clinical data which were diagnosed as acoustic neuroma.

RESULTSIn 467 cases of sudden sensorineural hearing loss, nine cases were diagnosed as acoustic neuromas (9 ears, 1.93%), two males and seven females, with a age range of 28 to 57 years. Among them, seven cases accompanied with tinnitus, seven cases with vertigo. The hearing results in nine cases, two cases were found to be mild, two were moderate, four were severe, and one was profound hearling loss respectively. Hearing was classified into five types according to audiogram shape (1 of up-sloping, 1 of down-sloping, 2 of mid-frequency, 1 of profound loss, 4 of flat audiogram). Eight cases had abnormal ABR, nine cases with ear ipsilateral stapedius reflex were completely not elicited, seven cases with health ear contralateral stapedius reflex were completely not elicited. Tumors were graded by Koos Grades according to size (7 of grade I, 1 of grade II, 1 of grade IV). Seven small acoustic neuroma was taken waiting strategies. Meanwhile, we use glucocorticoid and improve the microcirculation of the inner ear medication short-termly for these patients. Four patients' hearing were improved.

CONCLUSIONSThe initial symptoms of some acoustic neuroma are sudden hearing loss, especially the small tumors in internal auditory canal. In order to prevent misdiagnosis, MRI and ABR should be performed as a routine test for sudden sensorineural hearing loss. It is necessary to give appropriate treatment to protecting hearing for the small acoustic neuroma patients whose first symptoms are diagnosed as sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Adult ; Female ; Hearing ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neuroma, Acoustic ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tinnitus ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; Vertigo ; diagnosis ; epidemiology

OBJECTIVETo analyze the therapeutic effect of treatment for intermediate and high-frequency sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).

METHODSA prospective clinical multicentre research was conducted using international standardized approach of clinical research. SSNHL Cases with intermediate and high-frequency hearing loss, that accepted no medication from onset of hearing loss within two weeks duration and ages ranged between 18 and 65, were collected. All patients were treated by one of four treatments plans chosen by unified random table.

RESULTS141 patients with intermediate and high-frequency SSNHL were recruited in the research. Twenty subjects were treated with lidocaine, 21 cases with lidocaine and hormone, 40 cases with Ginaton, and 60 cases with Ginaton and hormone. 42 out of 141 (29.79%) patients were total recovery, 24 (17.02%)achieved excellent recovery, 27 (19.15%)achieved partial recovery, and 48 (34.04%) were ineffective. The total effective rate was 65.96%. In lidocaine group, the total effective rate was 55.00%, 66.67% in lidocaine and hormone group, 67.50% in Ginaton group, and 68.33% in Ginaton and hormone group. Considering the total effective rate, there was no statistical difference between four groups (P > 0.05). However, the recovery rate in Ginaton group was significant difference comparing with that in lidocaine group (P = 0.0496). 119 had concomitant symptom of tinnitus, and the tinnitus was improved in patients of 81.51%. With regard to total effective rate of tinnitus in four treatment groups, it was 57.89% (11/19) in lidocaine group, 100.00% (18/18) in lidocaine and hormone group, 88.57% (31/35) in Ginaton group, 78.72% (37/47) in Ginaton and hormone group. There was significant ascendancy in lidocaine and hormone group versus that in lidocaine group (P = 0.002) and Ginaton and hormone group (P = 0.029). And the difference between lidocaine and Ginaton groups was statistical significance (χ(2) = 6.705, P < 0.05). In 43 patients with muffled symptom in aural region, 90.70% was partial recovery. There was no statistical difference between each groups (χ(2) = 5.97,P = 0.74). There were 17 with dizziness or vertigo improved in all cases. Another 10 patients accompanied other complaints all improved.

CONCLUSIONSfor the treat of intermediate and high-frequency SSNHL, the therapeutic effect in hearing has no significantly different between single and combined drug therapies. Considering the recovery rate, there is an obvious advantage in Ginaton group compared with lidocaine group. Tinnitus is the major concomitant symptom in intermediate and high-frequency SSNHL, and lidocaine and hormone therapy should be used.

Adult ; Aged ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; Hearing ; Hearing Loss, High-Frequency ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; therapy ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; therapy ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Tinnitus ; Vertigo ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE: To identify the newborns who should receive hearing evaluation by hearing screening in high risk newborns; to find and confirm the high risk factors of hearing disorders in high risk newborns. METHOD: The first screening was performed by DPOAE. Newborns did not passed the first screening undertook second screening using DPOAE + ABR. and newborns did not passed the second screening received hearing evaluation. High risk factors of hearing loss were found by Logistic regression analysis. RESULT: Three hundred and twenty-seven cases were screened. The positive ratio in first screening was 37.0%. The positive ratio in second screening was 11.0%. Ten cases were diagnosed as hearing loss and the incidence of hearing loss was 3.39%. High risk factors of hearing loss were asphyxiation, very low born weight (<1,500 g) and head and neck abnormality. CONCLUSION (1) DPOAE combined with ABR is credible and feasible in hearing screening of high risk newborns. (2) High risk factors of hearing loss were asphyxiation, very low born weight (<1,500 g) and head and neck abnormality in this study.
Female ; Hearing Disorders ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; prevention & control ; Hearing Loss ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; prevention & control ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Neonatal Screening ; Risk Factors

OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical materials of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in different ages of patients, and explore their clinical characteristics and prognosis.

METHODSA retrospective review was conducted by the clinical symptoms, predisposing factors and prognosis in SSNHL patients with different ages in the past two years (from 2008 to 2010). All patients were divided into three groups according to age, including Group 1 (0-18 years old), Group 2 (19-59 years old), and Group 3 (over 60 years old).

RESULTSPart of patients (28.1%) had a clear history of virus infection in Group 1. Some patients (18.7%) had obvious history of emotional fluctuations or fatigue before the onset of SSNHL. Three groups of patients with "aural fullness" symptom accounted for 3.1%, 41.3% and 29.4% respectively. The proportions of patients with profound hearing loss in three groups were 62.5%, 40.0% and 33.3% respectively. Most patients improved hearing level during systemic internal medicine treatment. However, many patients (68.8%) in Group 1 showed poor therapeutic effect.

CONCLUSIONSSSNHL in different age stages has different clinical features. We can improve the personalized treatment program to this disease through the classification and grading treatment.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult

Objective: To understand the current situation of high-frequency hearing loss of workers exposed to occupational noise in Hubei Province and its multi-level influencing factors. Methods: In June 2021, the basic information, occupational history, physical examination results and other relevant information in the "Occupational Health Examinations Case Cards" for noise workers in Hubei Province in 2020 were extracted from the subsystem of the "China Disease Prevention and Control Information System". Multilevel level of logistic model was used to analyze the related factors of high-frequency hearing loss of noise-exposed workers. Results: In 2020, the incidence rate of occupational high-frequency hearing loss in Hubei Province was 8.25% (6450/78152), and the incidence rate in various regions of the province ranged from 1.13% to 19.87%. At the individual level, male, ≥ 30 years of age, 6-10 years of service, small and micro enterprises, as well as construction, mining, manufacturing, transportation and rental services were the risk factors for high-frequency hearing loss (P<0.05). The risk of high-frequency hearing loss among workers in foreign-funded enterprises was significantly lower than that of workers in state-owned/collective enterprises (P<0.05). At the regional level, the younger the age of the employees, the lower the risk of high-frequency hearing loss (P<0.05). There was no significant correlation between the regional economic level and the risk of high-frequency hearing loss (P>0.05) . Conclusion: The incidence rate of occupational high-frequency hearing loss in Hubei Province is low in 2020, but the incidence rate varies greatly in different regions of the province, mainly due to differences in employment age, while the development of regional economic level has not reduced the risk of occupational high-frequency hearing loss.
Male ; Humans ; Child ; Hearing Loss, High-Frequency ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/diagnosis* ; Occupational Diseases/epidemiology* ; Occupational Exposure/adverse effects* ; Noise, Occupational/adverse effects*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of universal newborn hearing screening in countryside in order to provide reliable evidence in launching this program all over the countryside of China. METHOD: Subjects were 12,638 infants who were born in 9 counties from Jan 2004 to Dec 2005. TEOAE was used for the fast hearing screening. Infants were screened on the 2-7 days after the birth. The re-screening was conducted in 4-6 weeks if failed in the initial screening, and follow-up were provided continually if they also failed in the re-screening. RESULT: Ten thousand eight hundred and forty-five of 12,638 (85.8%) were screened including 9,963 (91.9%) normal newborns and 882 (8.1%) newborns with high-risk. Seven thousand four hundred and fifty (68.7%) newborns passed the initial screening, and 3,395 (31.3%) people failed. One thousand seven hundred and ninety-three (14.2%) infants were refused to be screened. Only 2,536 (74.7%) were re-screened on time, and 859 (25.3%) did not receive re-screening. One hundred and twenty were failed in the re-screening or first screening, and 79 (65.8%) of them received diagnostic assessment. Among the infants received diagnostic assessment, 6 (7.6%) cases were found to have profound hearing loss in both ears, 9 (11.4%) cases were found to be severe hearing loss (7 in both ears and 2 in single ear), 11 (13.9%) cases were found to be moderate hearing loss (5 in both ear and 6 in single ear), 26 (32.9%) were found to have slight hearing loss (11 in both ear and 15 in single ears), and 27 (34.2%) were normal. Fifty-two infants were diagnosed as hearing loss with a prevalence of congenital hearing loss (in binaural and monaural) of 0.5% (52/10845) and a prevalence of bilateral hearing loss of 0.3% (29/10845). A prevalence of congenital hearing loss was 0.2% (22/9,963) in well infants and 3.4% (30/882) in high risk infants. Among the 13 cases of children with severe and profound hearing loss in both ears children, 8 (61.5%) cases were fitted with hearing aids and 1 (7.7%) case was implanted with cochlear implants. CONCLUSION It is necessary and feasible to conduct hearing screening program in the rural area. However, the suitable model to perform the program in the countryside needs to be set up as soon as possible in order to get more poor infants to participate into the hearing screening program for free and increase the screening rate.
China ; epidemiology ; Feasibility Studies ; Hearing Loss ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Neonatal Screening ; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous ; Prevalence ; Rural Population

OBJECTIVEIn order to provide the evidence for taking the measures to prevent noise hazards, the condition sand influence factors of occupational noise deafness diagnosis in Jiangsu province from 2006 to 2013 were analyzed.

METHODSAccording to the 13 administrating personnel report of noise deafness diagnosed occupational disease prevention and control institutions in Jiangsu province from 2006 to 2013, the diagnosis of occupational noise deafness were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTSBy the end of December 31 2013, 297 cases of noise deafness were diagnosis occupational disease within this province. Occupational noise deafness has localized on the machinery industry, textile and light industry. Regional distribution mainly concentrated in Suzhou, Yangzhou, Nanjing, Nantong. 83.16% in 297 cases were mild noise deafness.

CONCLUSIONThe distribution of occupational noise deafness cases in Jiangsu province has specific charateristics. It is not balanced in different regions, and most of them are the mild noise deafness, male, length of service in more than 15 years, the onset age is 40~60 years old, According to characteristics of the occupational noise deafness cases in Jiangsu province, Specific occupational health service will help to reduce the occurrence of occupational noise deafness, and protect the worker's health effectively.

Adult ; Age of Onset ; China ; epidemiology ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; Humans ; Industry ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Noise, Occupational ; adverse effects ; Occupational Diseases ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; Occupational Health Services