1.Next-generation sequencing in molecular diagnosis of hereditary hearing loss.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2014;28(22):1815-1818
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have improved as well as the costs have gradually decreased in the detections of genetic diseases. This article describes the principle, platform, and data analysis of NGS and the application of NGS technologies to the molecular diagnosis of hereditary hearing loss (HL). The use of NGS technologies makes the discovery of HL genes more feasible than ever. And the data obtained by NGS used in genetic counseling for clinical practice may assist in defining genetic profiles of HL individuals and expedite the pace of personalized medical care.
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
;
diagnosis
;
genetics
;
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
;
Humans
2.Genetic counseling for hearing loss today.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2024;38(1):1-7
Genetic counseling for hearing loss today originated from decoding the genetic code of hereditary hearing loss, which serves as an effective strategy for preventing hearing loss and constitutes a crucial component of the diagnostic and therapeutic framework. This paper described the main principles and contents of genetic counseling for hearing loss, the key points of counseling across various genetic models and its application in tertiary prevention strategies targeting hearing impairment. The prospects of an AI-assisted genetic counseling decision system and the envisions of genetic counseling in preventing hereditary hearing loss were introduced. Genetic counseling for hearing loss today embodies the hallmark of a new era, which is inseparable from the advancements in science and technology, and will undoubtedly contribute to precise gene intervention!
Humans
;
Genetic Counseling
;
Deafness/genetics*
;
Hearing Loss/diagnosis*
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics*
3.Splicing mutations of GSDME cause late-onset non-syndromic hearing loss.
Danyang LI ; Hongyang WANG ; Qiuju WANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2024;38(1):30-37
Objective:To dentify the genetic and audiological characteristics of families affected by late-onset hearing loss due to GSDMEgene mutations, aiming to explore clinical characteristics and pathogenic mechanisms for providing genetic counseling and intervention guidance. Methods:Six families with late-onset hearing loss from the Chinese Deafness Genome Project were included. Audiological tests, including pure-tone audiometry, acoustic immittance, speech recognition scores, auditory brainstem response, and distortion product otoacoustic emission, were applied to evaluate the hearing levels of patients. Combining with medical history and physical examination to analyze the phenotypic differences between the probands and their family members. Next-generation sequencing was used to identify pathogenic genes in probands, and validations were performed on their relatives by Sanger sequencing. Pathogenicity analysis was performed according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Guidelines. Meanwhile, the pathogenic mechanisms of GSDME-related hearing loss were explored combining with domestic and international research progress. Results:Among the six families with late-onset hearing loss, a total of 30 individuals performed hearing loss. The onset of hearing loss in these families ranged from 10 to 50 years(mean age: 27.88±9.74 years). In the study, four splicing mutations of the GSDME were identified, including two novel variants: c. 991-7C>G and c. 1183+1G>T. Significantly, the c. 991-7C>G was a de novo variant. The others were previously reported variants: c. 991-1G>C and c. 991-15_991-13del, the latter was identified in three families. Genotype-phenotype correlation analysis revealed that probands with the c. 991-7C>G and c. 1183+1G>T performed a predominantly high-frequency hearing loss. The three families carrying the same mutation exhibited varying degrees of hearing loss, with an annual rate of hearing deterioration exceeding 0.94 dB HL/year. Furthermore, follow-up of interventions showed that four of six probands received intervention(66.67%), but the results of intervention varied. Conclusion:The study analyzed six families with late-onset non-syndromic hearing loss linked to GSDME mutations, identifying four splicing variants. Notably, c. 991-7C>G is the first reported de novo variant of GSDME globally. Audiological analysis revealed that the age of onset generally exceeded 10 years,with variable effectiveness of interventions.
Humans
;
Adolescent
;
Young Adult
;
Adult
;
Child
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis*
;
Deafness/genetics*
;
Mutation
;
Hearing Loss/genetics*
;
Pedigree
4.Research progress on hereditary endocrine and metabolic diseases associated with sensorineural hearing loss.
Fang CHEN ; Qinying ZHANG ; Qiujing ZHANG ; Qiuju WANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2024;38(1):63-69
Hereditary endocrine and metabolic diseases , caused by genetic factors, exhibit complex and diverse symptoms, including the possibility of concurrent sensorineural deafness. Currently, there is a limited clinical understanding of hereditary endocrine and metabolic diseases that manifest with deafness, the pathogenesis remains unclear,and there is a lack of effective diagnostic and treatment methods. This article summarizes the research progress of hereditary endocrine and metabolic diseases complicated with deafness from the pathogenesis, clinical phenotype, diagnosis and treatment. Understanding the current research progress and integrating genetic analysis into clinical practice are crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment, evaluating clinical efficacy, and providing effective genetic counseling for these diseases.
Humans
;
Deafness/genetics*
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis*
;
Phenotype
;
Metabolic Diseases/genetics*
;
Genetic Counseling
6.Etiology of Hearing Loss and Genetic Hearing Loss.
So Young KIM ; Byung Yoon CHOI
Hanyang Medical Reviews 2015;35(2):66-71
Hearing loss is one of the most common sensory disorders and has numerous environmental and genetic factors that influence its onset and development. Hearing loss can be classified by either the affected anatomic or functional lesion of hearing loss, or as conductive or sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Genetic factors account for about 50% of congenital SNHL, and are therefore the most common cause. Molecular genetics research has identified more than 100 genes related to hearing and hearing loss, and shown that the risk of hearing loss caused by non-genetic factor is modified by genetic susceptibility. About 30% of genetic hearing loss is syndromic related and has affected phenotypic markers in other organs that make it easier to correctly diagnose the etiology of the hearing loss. In some cases, hearing loss can precede the pathologies of other organs and in these cases, hearing loss acts as a predictor of the syndrome associated pathologies of other organs. Inheritance of nonsyndromic hearing loss follows common inheritance patterns such as autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, sex chromosome related, and mitochondrial inheritances. The paucity of predominant phenotypes and ethnic specificity of the prevalence and types of mutations may hinder the genetic diagnosis in nonsyndromic hearing loss. However, progress in elucidating the causal mutations is going forward using stratified genetic diagnostic strategies of candidate genes identified by hearing phenotypes and patterns of inheritance.
Diagnosis
;
Fibrinogen
;
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
;
Genetics
;
Hearing
;
Hearing Loss*
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
;
Inheritance Patterns
;
Molecular Biology
;
Pathology
;
Phenotype
;
Prevalence
;
Risk Factors
;
Sensation Disorders
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Sex Chromosomes
;
Wills
7.Genetic characteristic analysis of slight-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss in children.
Rui ZHOU ; Jing GUAN ; Qiuju WANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2024;38(1):18-22
Objective:To analyze genetic factors and phenotype characteristics in pediatric population with slight-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Methods:Children with slight-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss of and their parents, enrolled from the Chinese Deafness Genome Project, were studied. Hearing levels were assessed using pure tone audiometry, behavioral audiometry, auditory steady state response(ASSR), auditory brainstem response(ABR) thresholds, and deformed partial otoacoustic emission(DPOAE). Classification of hearing loss is according to the 2022 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics(ACMG) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hearing Loss. Whole exome sequencing(WES) and deafness gene Panel testing were performed on peripheral venous blood from probands and validations were performed on their parents by Sanger sequencing. Results:All 134 patients had childhood onset, exhibiting bilateral symmetrical slight-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss, as indicated by audiological examinations. Of the 134 patients, 29(21.6%) had a family history of hearing loss, and the rest were sporadic patients. Genetic causative genes were identified in 66(49.3%) patients. A total of 11 causative genes were detected, of which GJB2 was causative in 34 cases(51.5%), STRC in 10 cases(15.1%), MPZL2 gene in six cases(9.1%), and USH2A in five cases(7.6%).The most common gene detected in slight-to-moderate hearing loss was GJB2, with c. 109G>A homozygous mutation found in 16 cases(47.1%) and c. 109G>A compound heterozygous mutation in 9 cases(26.5%). Conclusion:This study provides a crucial genetic theory reference for early screening and detection of mild to moderate hearing loss in children, highlighting the predominance of recessive inheritance and the significance of gene like GJB2, STRC, MPZL2, USH2A.
Humans
;
Child
;
Connexins/genetics*
;
Connexin 26/genetics*
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis*
;
Mutation
;
Usher Syndromes
;
Hearing Loss, Bilateral
;
Audiometry, Pure-Tone
;
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
8.Analysis of clinical phenotype and genetic variants among four Chinese pedigrees affected with Waardenburg syndrome.
Lulu WANG ; Lu MAO ; Hongen XU ; Shuping SUN ; Bin ZUO ; Wei LU
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2023;40(6):661-667
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the genetic basis for four Chinese pedigrees affected with Waardenburg syndrome (WS).
METHODS:
Four WS probands and their pedigree members who had presented at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between July 2021 and March 2022 were selected as the study subjects. Proband 1, a 2-year-and-11-month female, had blurred speech for over 2 years. Proband 2, a 10-year-old female, had bilateral hearing loss for 8 years. Proband 3, a 28-year-old male, had right side hearing loss for over 10 years. Proband 4, a 2-year-old male, had left side hearing loss for one year. Clinical data of the four probands and their pedigree members were collected, and auxiliary examinations were carried out. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples and subjected to whole exome sequencing. Candidate variants were verified by Sanger sequencing.
RESULTS:
Proband 1, with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, blue iris and dystopia canthorum, was found to have harbored a heterozygous c.667C>T (p.Arg223Ter) nonsense variant of the PAX3 gene, which was inherited from her father. Based on the guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), the variant was classified as pathogenic (PVS1+PM2_Supporting+PP4), and the proband was diagnosed with WS type I. Proband 2, with moderate sensorineural hearing loss on the right side and severe sensorineural hearing loss on the left side, has harbored a heterozygous frameshifting c.1018_1022del (p.Val340SerfsTer60) variant of the SOX10 gene. Neither of her parents has harbored the same variant. Based on the ACMG guidelines, it was classified as pathogenic (PVS1+PM2_Supporting+PP4+PM6), and the proband was diagnosed with WS type II. Proband 3, with profound sensorineural hearing loss on the right side, has harbored a heterozygous c.23delC (p.Ser8TrpfsTer5) frameshifting variant of the SOX10 gene. Based on the ACMG guidelines, it was classified as pathogenic (PVS1+PM2_Supporting+PP4), and the proband was diagnosed with WS type II. Proband 4, with profound sensorineural hearing loss on the left side, has harbored a heterozygous c.7G>T (p.Glu3Ter) nonsense variant of the MITF gene which was inherited from his mother. Based on the ACMG guidelines, the variant was classified as pathogenic (PVS1+PM2_Supporting+PP4), and the proband was diagnosed with WS type II.
CONCLUSION
By genetic testing, the four probands were all diagnosed with WS. Above finding has facilitated molecular diagnosis and genetic counseling for their pedigrees.
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Deafness
;
East Asian People
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics*
;
Mutation
;
Pedigree
;
Phenotype
;
Waardenburg Syndrome/diagnosis*
9.Genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis for a Chinese pedigree affected with Waardenburg syndrome type 4C due to heterozygous deletion of SOX10 gene.
Jingjing LI ; Hongfei KANG ; Xiangdong KONG
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2023;40(11):1367-1372
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the genetic basis for a Chinese pedigree featuring congenital profound syndromic deafness and chronic constipation, and provide prenatal diagnosis for a high-risk fetus.
METHODS:
Whole-exome sequencing was carried out to analyze the sequences of genes associated with hereditary deafness, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was used to verify the candidate variant in the proband's parents and the fetus.
RESULTS:
The proband was found to have harbored a heterozygous deletion of SOX10, a pathogenic gene associated with Waardenburg syndrome type 4C (WS4C). The same deletion was found in her mother (with profound syndromic deafness and chronic constipation) and the fetus, but not in her father with normal hearing. Based on the guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), the SOX10 gene deletion was predicted to be a pathogenic variant (PVS1+PM2_Supporting+PP1+PP4).
CONCLUSION
The pedigree was diagnosed with WS4C, which has conformed to an autosomal dominant inheritance. Deletion of the entire SOX10 gene, as a loss-of-function variant, probably underlay its pathogenesis. Above finding has facilitated genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis for this family.
Humans
;
Female
;
Pregnancy
;
Pedigree
;
Waardenburg Syndrome/genetics*
;
East Asian People
;
Genetic Testing
;
Prenatal Diagnosis
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics*
;
Deafness/genetics*
;
Mothers
;
Constipation/genetics*
;
Mutation
;
SOXE Transcription Factors/genetics*
10.Clinical diagnose and significance of congenital sensorineural hearing loss combined with BPES.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2015;29(18):1660-1663
To analyze congenital sensorineural hearing loss combined with blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus syndrome (BPES). For the case of cochlear implantation to child with congenital sensorineural deafness combined BPES, accomplish routine examination and assessment, combining with literature to analyze the clinical diagnosis of this disease and its significance. Sensorineural hearing loss is a common congenital diseases with neonatal incidence of 1 per thousand - 3 per thousand, 50%-70% of deafness is associated with genetic factors, the incidence of congenital sensorineural hearing loss combined with eye disease is about 40%-60%, mainly reflected in ametropia and retinopathy. BPES's main clinical manifestations is blepharophimosis, ptosis, epicanthus inversus, and telecanthus. BPES is a rare autosomal dominant disease caused by FOXL 2 gene mutation, sometimes associated with retarded growth, delayed development, congenital heart disease, and microcephaly. Suffering from both sensorineural hearing loss and BPES is rare in reported literature. This case is diagnosed by clinical examination, without visual impairment. Facial nerve dysplasia has been found during the surgery. For congenital deafness patients with eye disease or other diseases, timely and correct diagnosis has important clinical significance, which can improve the diagnostic rate and make it coming true to early intervention, and then, effectively improve the quality of the patients. There are few literature reports, of patients with two kinds of genetic diseases. Our inference is that the cases are rare or the patients has visited different departments and ignored the other systems' signs. Therefore, in such doubtful cases, we should do the professional comprehensive examination in daily clinical work in order to avoid missed diagnosis or delayed treatment and intervention. By analyzing this case, the patient may also suffer from facial nerve dysplasia. Preoperatively viewing CT scan and operatively facial nerve monitor being used can avoid the occurrence of surgical complications.
Blepharophimosis
;
complications
;
genetics
;
Child
;
Forkhead Transcription Factors
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
;
congenital
;
diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Mutation
;
Skin Abnormalities
;
complications
;
genetics
;
Urogenital Abnormalities
;
complications
;
genetics