1.Release of Bisphenol A From Polycarbonate and Polyethylene Terephthalate Drinking Water Bottles Under Different Storage Conditions and Its Associated Health Risk
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 2018;14(SP2):18-26
Introduction: Bisphenol A (BPA) is a controversial plastics ingredient used mainly in the production of polycarbonate plastics (PC) and epoxy resins that widely used nowadays in food and drink packaging. Even though BPA is not involved in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) manufacturing, recent study had reported the present of BPA in PET water bottle. This study was conducted to investigate effects storage conditions on release of BPA from PC and PET bottled water as well as to assess health risks associated with consumption. Methods: Solid phase extraction (SPE) was used to extract the samples, followed by analysis using ultra high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detector (UHPLC-FLD). The possibility of developing chronic non-carcinogenic health risk among consumers of bottled water was evaluated using hazard quotient (HQ). Results: Results showed that BPA migrated from PC and PET water bottles at concentrations ranging from 9.13 to 257.67 ng/L and 11.53 ng/L to 269.87 ng/L respectively. Concentrations of BPA were higher in PET bottled water compared to PC bottled water across all storage conditions. Higher storage temperature and longer storage duration increased BPA concentrations in PC and PET bottled water. Concentrations of BPA in bottled water which were kept in a car and were exposed to sunlight were higher than control samples which were stored indoor at room temperature. Conclusion: No significant chronic non-carcinogenic health risks were calculated for daily ingestion of BPA-contaminated bottled water; calculated HQ was less than one.
Health risk assessment
2.Risk of bias assessment: (9) Application of the risk of bias assessment results.
Y ZHANG ; Z R YANG ; F SUN ; S Y ZHAN
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2018;39(12):1648-1654
In this last paper of the series about risk of bias assessment, we introduce the application of risk of bias assessment results. Risk of bias assessment is one of the key steps in the assessment of quality of evidence. The risk of bias assessment results could be the "diagnosis" of individual studies, which helps decision making related to the inclusion and exclusion of individual studies, as well as the data analysis in the systematic review process. This paper focuses on how to incorporate risk of bias assessment results in the GRADE assessment for quality of evidence, including the principles and the tips for the application.
Bias
;
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
;
Risk Assessment
3.Risk Assessment in the UK Health and Safety System: Theory and Practice.
Safety and Health at Work 2010;1(1):11-18
In the UK, a person or organisation that creates risk is required to manage and control that risk so that it is reduced 'So Far As Is Reasonably Practicable' (SFAIRP). How the risk is managed is to be determined by those who create the risk. They have a duty to demonstrate that they have taken action to ensure all risk is reduced SFAIRP and must have documentary evidence, for example a risk assessment or safety case, to prove that they manage the risks their activities create. The UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) does not tell organisations how to manage the risks they create but does inspect the quality of risk identification and management. This paper gives a brief overview of where responsibility for occupational health and safety lies in the UK, and how risk should be managed through risk assessment. The focus of the paper is three recent major UK incidents, all involving fatalities, and all of which were wholly avoidable if risks had been properly assessed and managed. The paper concludes with an analysis of the common failings of risk assessments and key actions for improvement.
Dietary Sucrose
;
Humans
;
Occupational Health
;
Risk Assessment
4.Risk Assessment in the UK Health and Safety System: Theory and Practice.
Safety and Health at Work 2010;1(1):11-18
In the UK, a person or organisation that creates risk is required to manage and control that risk so that it is reduced 'So Far As Is Reasonably Practicable' (SFAIRP). How the risk is managed is to be determined by those who create the risk. They have a duty to demonstrate that they have taken action to ensure all risk is reduced SFAIRP and must have documentary evidence, for example a risk assessment or safety case, to prove that they manage the risks their activities create. The UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) does not tell organisations how to manage the risks they create but does inspect the quality of risk identification and management. This paper gives a brief overview of where responsibility for occupational health and safety lies in the UK, and how risk should be managed through risk assessment. The focus of the paper is three recent major UK incidents, all involving fatalities, and all of which were wholly avoidable if risks had been properly assessed and managed. The paper concludes with an analysis of the common failings of risk assessments and key actions for improvement.
Dietary Sucrose
;
Humans
;
Occupational Health
;
Risk Assessment
6.Assessment of the Cardiovascular Risk of Persons with Hypertension and Diabetes Attending Clinics and Hypertension/Health Club Meetings in the AMIGA Municipalities of Cavite, Philippines using WHO/ISH Risk Prediction Charts
Acta Medica Philippina 2020;54(5):536-545
Objectives:
This study aims to (1) determine the cardiovascular risk of persons with hypertension and diabetes attending hypertension/diabetic clinics or hypertension/health club meetings in the AMIGA (Alfonso, Mendez, Indang, General Emilio Aguinaldo and Amadeo) municipalities of Cavite; (2) suggest measures to improve the cardiovascular disease (CVD) program in these municipalities using the results of the study.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was performed on patients diagnosed with hypertension and/or diabetes who are attending clinics or club meetings in the barangays of the five AMIGA municipalities of Cavite. Participants were interviewed using an abbreviated version of the World Health Organization (WHO) STEPS questionnaire on risk factors. The participants’ anthropometric measurements were obtained and their total blood cholesterol levels determined. CVD risk was then estimated using the WHO / International Society of Hypertension (ISH) risk prediction chart for the Western Pacific Region B.
Results:
1,032 participants from 27 barangays qualified for the study. Participants were predominantly female (74%); over-all mean age was 58.43 years. The majority of the participants (79.17%) were found to be in the low-risk group; 11.34% were in the moderate risk group; 4.46% were in the high-risk group; while 5.05% were in the very high-risk group. Majority of the participants were also found to be obese. Mean total cholesterol was 207.02 mg/dl.
Conclusion
Majority of participants were stratified in the low-risk category (<10% chance to have cardiovascularevents in the next 10 years), while 9.5% were in the high-risk category (≥20% risk). Obesity is a major risk factor that could be addressed in this population.
Cardiovascular Diseases
;
Risk Assessment
;
World Health Organization
7.Caries risk assessment in children.
West China Journal of Stomatology 2014;32(1):1-4
Caries risk assessment (CRA) involves a combination and analysis of factors including individual's age, biological factors, and protective and clinical findings. CRA significantly guides pediatric dentists and oral health caregivers in their decision-making plan for clinical treatment. The following is an introduction on the aspects of harmfulness of childhood caries and CRA for children of different ages.
Child
;
Dental Caries
;
Humans
;
Oral Health
;
Risk Assessment
;
Risk Factors
8.Comparison of Health Problems, Conditions, & Health Promoting Behavior and Risky Environment among Various Industrial Workers.
Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing 2009;18(1):71-83
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare health conditions and problems, health promoting behavior, and risky environment of industrial workers. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 1,075 workers in 40 factories, located in Daegu, Korea. Survey data were collected from April 17th, 2006 to April 28th, 2006. CMI (Cornell Medical Index) Health Checklist was used to assess the health problems, Health Rating Scale for health status, HPLP II for health promoting behavior, and environmental risk assessment tool for risky environment. The data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Pearson Correlation Coefficient using SPSS 12.0 for windows. RESULTS: The results indicated a significant difference in health problems (F=4.70, p=.000), health conditions (F=2.47, p=.022), health promoting behavior (F=5.67, p=.000), and risky environment (F=14.75, p=.000) among these industrial workers. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that there is a need to develop customized health care programs for each company to provide differentiated health care to different types of work places. Further studies are required to assess differences in work environment among different types of work places for measures to reduce harmful factors to the environment.
Checklist
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Health Promotion
;
Korea
;
Risk Assessment
;
Workplace
9.Comparison of Health Problems, Conditions, & Health Promoting Behavior and Risky Environment among Various Industrial Workers.
Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing 2009;18(1):71-83
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare health conditions and problems, health promoting behavior, and risky environment of industrial workers. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 1,075 workers in 40 factories, located in Daegu, Korea. Survey data were collected from April 17th, 2006 to April 28th, 2006. CMI (Cornell Medical Index) Health Checklist was used to assess the health problems, Health Rating Scale for health status, HPLP II for health promoting behavior, and environmental risk assessment tool for risky environment. The data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Pearson Correlation Coefficient using SPSS 12.0 for windows. RESULTS: The results indicated a significant difference in health problems (F=4.70, p=.000), health conditions (F=2.47, p=.022), health promoting behavior (F=5.67, p=.000), and risky environment (F=14.75, p=.000) among these industrial workers. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that there is a need to develop customized health care programs for each company to provide differentiated health care to different types of work places. Further studies are required to assess differences in work environment among different types of work places for measures to reduce harmful factors to the environment.
Checklist
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Health Promotion
;
Korea
;
Risk Assessment
;
Workplace
10.Risk Assessment: Factors Contributing to Discomfort for Menopausal Women in Workplace.
Mehdi JAFARI ; Bahar SEIFI ; Mohammad HEIDARI
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2017;23(2):85-90
The purpose of this study was to review the Factors contributing to discomfort for menopausal women in workplace and the perceived effects of working conditions on menopausal symptoms, and to produce recommendations for managers and women. This study was a review article. We searched PubMed and Science Direct for articles related to menopause and workplace. Keywords included: menopause AND workplace OR occupational health or menopausal women AND managers. Because we aimed to update the literature following the 2011 review of menopause and workplace, only English-language articles published between 2011 and 2017 were included. This review showed that how managers could be help and awareness and what should be done for menopausal women in workplace by risk assessment. Many risk factors are contributing to discomfort for menopausal women in workplace and managers should be assessed them. Managers should be aware that menopausal transition causes difficulty for some women at work, then occupational health and safety and health promotion policies will be increasingly important. It may help inform the development of tailored occupational health policies and programs that cater for the needs of women as they transition through menopause in the workplace.
Female
;
Health Promotion
;
Humans
;
Menopause
;
Occupational Health
;
Risk Assessment*
;
Risk Factors
;
Women's Health