INTRODUCTIONRadiation injury resulting in sudden, late onset sensorineural hearing loss is a recognised complication in patients who have received head and neck irradiation. We describe the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the internal acoustic canal (IAC) of 3 such patients and postulate a cause for these findings.

CLINICAL PICTUREA total of 63 patients were referred for MRI IAC for sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss. Of these patients, only 5 patients had abnormal MRI finding in the affected ear and the remaining patients had normal studies. Two patients had acoustic neuromas. Three patients demonstrated high T1-weighted signal in the labyrinths of the affected ears and had past histories of head and neck irradiation. The MRI findings and medical records of these 3 patients were reviewed and described in this case series.

OUTCOMEHigh labyrinthine signal on unenhanced T1-weighted images in the symptomatic ear of these patients was observed, suggesting the possibility of haemorrhage. In the patient who had a history of brain tumour, susceptibility artifacts were also seen in the right hemipons on the gradient-echo images, indicating the presence of paramagnetic substances from previous therapy.

CONCLUSIONWe postulate that labyrinthine haemorrhage is a rare, late complication of head and neck irradiation, resulting in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Female ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; radiotherapy ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; etiology ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; etiology ; Hemorrhage ; complications ; Humans ; Labyrinth Diseases ; complications ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiotherapy ; adverse effects ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Time Factors

PURPOSE: An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol incorporates up-to-date perioperative care principles; the primary aim in using an ERAS protocol is to reduce issues that delay the recovery and cause the complications. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes associated with head and neck cancer surgery with free-flap reconstruction before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol. METHODS: Outcomes were analyzed by dividing patients into 2 groups: 29 patients in the non-ERAS group and 60 patients in the ERAS group. The ERAS group performed a prospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent a head and neck cancer surgery with free-flap reconstruction in Ajou University Hospital from August 2015 to December 2017. The non-ERAS group retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had undergone the same surgery from August 2012 to July 2015. RESULTS: Demographics, comorbidities, hospital length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, starting time of rehabilitation, and postoperative periods before radiotherapy for the non-ERAS and ERAS groups were compared. Hospital LOS was significantly lower for patients whose care followed the ERAS protocol than for patients in the non-ERAS group (30.87 ± 20.72 days vs. 59.66 ± 40.43 days, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this study, hospital LOS was reduced through fast recovery after the implementation of the ERAS protocol. Therefore, the ERAS protocol appeared feasible and safe in head and neck cancer surgery with free-flap reconstruction.
Cohort Studies ; Comorbidity ; Demography ; Free Tissue Flaps ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; Head ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Medical Records ; Perioperative Care ; Postoperative Care ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Rehabilitation ; Retrospective Studies

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate specific dysphagia patterns and to identify the factors affecting dysphagia, especially aspiration, following treatment of head and neck cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 57 patients was performed. Dysphagia was evaluated using a modified barium swallow (MBS) test. The MBS results were rated on the 8-point penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) and swallowing performance status (SPS) score. RESULTS: Reduced base of the tongue (BOT) retraction (64.9%), reduced laryngeal elevation (57.9%), and cricopharyngeus (CP) dysfunction (47.4%) were found. Reduced BOT retraction was correlated with clinical stage (p=0.011) and treatment modality (p=0.001). Aspiration in 42.1% and penetration in 33.3% of patients were observed. Twenty-four patients had PAS values over 6, implying aspiration. Forty-one patients had a SPS score of more than 3, 25 patients had a score greater than 5, and 13 patients had a SPS score of more than 7. Aspiration was found more often in patients with penetration (p=0.002) and in older patients (p=0.026). In older patients, abnormal swallowing caused aspiration even in those with a SPS score of more than 3, irrespective of stage or treatment, contrary to younger patients. Tube feeders (n=20) exhibited older age (65.0%), dysphagia/aspiration related structures (DARS) primaries (75.0%), higher stage disease (66.7%), and a history of radiotherapy (68.8%). CONCLUSION: Reduced BOT retraction was the most common dysphagia pattern and was correlated with clinical stage and treatment regimens including radiotherapy. Aspiration was more frequent in patients who had penetration and in older patients. In contrast to younger patients, older patients showed greater risk of aspiration even with a single abnormal swallowing irrespective of stage or treatment.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; *Barium Sulfate ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Contrast Media ; Deglutition ; *Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis/etiology/physiopathology ; Enteral Nutrition ; Female ; Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications/*radiotherapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; *Respiratory Aspiration/diagnosis/etiology/physiopathology ; Retrospective Studies

Adenoma, Pleomorphic ; diagnosis ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Angiography, Digital Subtraction ; Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic ; diagnosis ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Child ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neurilemmoma ; diagnosis ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Oral Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Postoperative Complications ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Young Adult