1.A Comparison Study of Ego Defense Mechanisms between Conduct Adolescents and Normal Adolescents.
Jae Ho SONG ; Hea Kyung JHIN ; Bongseog KIM
Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2009;20(3):140-145
OBJECTIVES: This study explored the differences in their ego defense mechanisms between adolescents with conduct disorder and normal adolescents. METHODS: Subjects were 35 adolescents with conduct disorder and 44 normal adolescents. The Ewha Defense Mechanism Test (EDMT), consisting of 200 items and 20 scales, was administered, to examine the defense mechanisms of both groups of adolescents. RESULTS: Normal adolescents presented statistically significantly higher scores on the reaction formation, controlling, suppression, anticipation, dissociation, and distortion scales than did adolescents with conduct disorder. Zn addition, adolescents with conduct disorder used neurotic defense mechanisms of both neurotic and mature levels less frequently than normal adolescents did. Factor analysis revealed that, normal adolescents had higher scores on ego-expansive factor scales and behavior control factor scales thanadolescents with conduct disorder did. CONCLUSION: The results suggest adolescents with conduct disorder use mature and ego-expansive defense mechanisms less frequently than do normal adolescents.
Adolescent
;
Behavior Control
;
Conduct Disorder
;
Defense Mechanisms
;
Dissociative Disorders
;
Ego
;
Humans
;
Weights and Measures
2.Clinical Characteristics of Methylphenidate Use in Korean Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder : A Retrospective Study.
Jin Park PARK ; Jong Il LEE ; Hea Kyung JHIN ; Hae Ji MIN ; Jun Won HWANG ; Yeni KIM
Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2012;23(3):154-160
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical characteristics of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) using methylphenidate (MPH). METHODS: Retrospective review of the charts of 79 children and adolescents with ASDs, who visited the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry of Seoul National Hospital, from July 2010 to July 2011, was conducted. Changes in illness severity and improvement were measured using the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of illness (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scales. RESULTS: We found that MPH was prescribed in 23 (29.1%) children and adolescents. Of the 23 patients on MPH, 4 patients (17.4%) were on MPH monotherapy and 18 patients (78.3%) were using risperidone concomitantly. MPH was prescribed primarily for symptoms of hyperactivity and impulsivity in ASDs patients. The mean dosage of MPH was 26.2+/-11.1mg/day and mean duration of treatment was 31.9+/-28.7 months. Mean CGI-S score improved significantly from baseline to endpoint (from 5.4+/-0.6 to 4.1+/-0.9 ; p<.01). MPH was reported to be effective in 17 patients (17/23, 73.9%), and 10 patients (10/23, 43.5%) reported side effects. Side effects included decreased appetite (4/23, 17.4%), tic (2/23, 8.6%), sleep disturbances (2/23, 8.6%), headache (1/23, 4.3%) and irritability (1/23, 4.3%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that MPH may be used effectively and safely in children and adolescents with ASDs with hyperactivity and impulsivity. Future controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Adolescent
;
Adolescent Psychiatry
;
Appetite
;
Autistic Disorder
;
Child
;
Autism Spectrum Disorder
;
Headache
;
Humans
;
Methylphenidate
;
Phenazines
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risperidone
;
Tics