1.Prospects for Analysis and Follow-up Guidance Based on a Combination of Health Checkups and Dietary Habit Evaluations
Yoshiko YAMANO ; Kozue CHISAKA ; Saki AMANO ; Nanako SAKAI ; Maki SAWADA ; Miho NOYORI ; Shiori MATSUSHITA ; Akira SHIBUYA ; Haruo YAMADA
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2017;65(5):976-983
The impact of health guidance is recently becoming higher quality health services, and the next task is finding ways to establish a system that delivers higher quality services. Institutions that provide health guidance need to improve their services by analyzing the lifestyle habits and health examination results (e.g., BMI and blood pressure) of their clients. This study conducted simultaneous health and dietary habit checkups so that key elements for guidance (e.g., individual dietary habits, population characteristics, and main tasks) could be shared among guidance providers and be utilized for follow-up guidance. Most subjects were in their sixties or seventies, many of whom were diagnosed with obesity and/or dyslipidemia based on health examination results. Dietary habit evaluations revealed high intake of a main dish among both men and women. Intake of a main dish and a sweet snack was particularly high among men. Many subjects who excessively take in both a main dish and sweet snack were obese with a high percentage of saturated fatty acid-derived energy, indicating that this subgroup needs to be prioritized to receive guidance. Those with an appropriate intake of both a main dish and sweet snack might have consumed inadvisable levels of other dietary components, including luxury food items. However, an individual approach is also required to address the risk associated with intake of a low percentage of protein-derived energy. Similar studies in other populations and other communities are needed to assess whether the characteristics revealed in this study are specific to this particular population.
2.Hyperfractionated radiotherapy for re-irradiation of recurrent esophageal cancer
Kazuya TAKEDA ; Haruo MATSUSHITA ; Rei UMEZAWA ; Takaya YAMAMOTO ; Yojiro ISHIKAWA ; Noriyoshi TAKAHASHI ; Yu SUZUKI ; Keiichi JINGU
Radiation Oncology Journal 2021;39(4):265-269
Purpose:
Re-irradiation is a treatment option for recurrent esophageal cancer patients with a history of radiotherapy, but there is a risk of severe late adverse effects. This study focused on the efficacy and safety of re-irradiation using hyperfractionated radiotherapy.
Materials and Methods:
Twenty-six patients who underwent re-irradiation by the hyperfraction technique using twice-daily irradiation of 1.2 Gy per fraction for recurrent esophageal cancer were retrospectively included in this study. The overall survival period after the start of secondary radiotherapy and the occurrence of late adverse effects were investigated.
Results:
Of 26 patients, 21 (81%) received re-irradiation with definitive intention and 21 (81%) underwent concurrent chemotherapy. The median re-irradiation dose was 60 Gy in 50 fractions in 25 treatment days, and the median accumulated irradiation dose in equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction was 85.4 Gy with an α/β value of 3. The median interval between two courses of radiotherapy was 21.0 months. The median overall survival period was 15.8 months and the 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates were 64.3% and 28.3%, respectively. Higher dose of re-irradiation and concurrent chemotherapy significantly improved survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.019, respectively). Severe late adverse effects with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or higher were observed in 5 (19.2%) patients, and 2 (7.7%) of them developed a grade 5 late adverse effect.
Conclusion
High-dose re-irradiation using a hyperfractionated schedule with concurrent chemotherapy might be related to good prognosis, while the rate of late severe adverse effects is not high compared with the rates in past reports.
3.Factors Predicting Difficult Biliary Cannulation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Common Bile Duct Stones
Hirokazu SAITO ; Yoshihiro KADONO ; Takashi SHONO ; Kentaro KAMIKAWA ; Atsushi URATA ; Jiro NASU ; Haruo IMAMURA ; Ikuo MATSUSHITA ; Tatsuyuki KAKUMA ; Shuji TADA
Clinical Endoscopy 2022;55(2):263-269
Background/Aims:
Difficult biliary cannulation is an important risk factor for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). Therefore, this study aimed to identify the factors that predict difficult cannulation for common bile duct stones (CBDS) to reduce the risk for PEP.
Methods:
This multicenter retrospective study included 1,406 consecutive patients with native papillae who underwent ERCP for CBDS. Factors predicting difficult cannulation for CBDS were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results:
Univariate analysis showed that six factors significantly predicted difficult cannulation: ERCP performed by non-expert endoscopists, low-volume center, absence of acute cholangitis, normal serum bilirubin, intradiverticular papilla, and type of major duodenal papilla. Multivariate analysis identified ERCP performed by non-expert endoscopists (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; p<0.001), low-volume center (OR, 1.6; p<0.001), intradiverticular papilla (OR, 1.3; p=0.007), normal serum bilirubin (OR, 1.3; p=0.038), and absence of acute cholangitis (OR, 1.3; p=0.049) as factors significantly predicting difficult cannulation for CBDS.
Conclusions
Initial cannulation by an experienced endoscopist, early rescue cannulation, or early takeover by an experienced endoscopist should be considered when performing ERCP for CBDS in the presence of factors predicting difficult cannulation.