1.Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Strokes: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Rami Z. MORSI ; Mohamed ELFIL ; Hazem S. GHAITH ; Mohammad ALADAWI ; Ahmad ELMASHAD ; Sachin KOTHARI ; Harsh DESAI ; Shyam PRABHAKARAN ; Fawaz AL-MUFTI ; Tareq KASS-HOUT
Journal of Stroke 2023;25(2):214-222
Background:
and Purpose New studies have shown that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is safe and effective for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large ischemic areas. The aim of our study is to conduct a living systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing EVT versus medical management only.
Methods:
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EVT versus medical management alone in AIS patients with large ischemic regions. We conducted our meta-analysis using fixed-effect models to compare functional independence, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) between EVT and standard medical management only. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the certainty of evidence for each outcome using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach.
Results:
Of 14,513 citations, we included 3 RCTs with a total of 1,010 participants. We found low-certainty evidence of possibly a large increase in the proportion of patients with functional independence (risk difference [RD] 30.3%, 95% CI 15.0% to 52.3%), low-certainty evidence of possibly a small non-significant decrease in mortality (RD -0.7%, 95% CI -3.8% to 3.5%), and low-certainty evidence of possibly a small non-significant increase in sICH (RD 3.1%, 95% CI -0.3% to 9.8%) for AIS patients with large infarcts who underwent EVT compared to medical management only.
Conclusion
Low-certainty evidence shows that there is possibly a large increase in functional independence, a small non-significant decrease in mortality, and a small non-significant increase in sICH amongst AIS patients with large infarcts undergoing EVT compared to medical management only.
2.Use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease: an update
Arshdeep SINGH ; Ramit MAHAJAN ; Saurabh KEDIA ; Amit Kumar DUTTA ; Abhinav ANAND ; Charles N. BERNSTEIN ; Devendra DESAI ; C. Ganesh PAI ; Govind MAKHARIA ; Harsh Vardhan TEVETHIA ; Joyce WY MAK ; Kirandeep KAUR ; Kiran PEDDI ; Mukesh Kumar RANJAN ; Perttu ARKKILA ; Rakesh KOCHHAR ; Rupa BANERJEE ; Saroj Kant SINHA ; Siew Chien NG ; Stephen HANAUER ; Suhang VERMA ; Usha DUTTA ; Vandana MIDHA ; Varun MEHTA ; Vineet AHUJA ; Ajit SOOD
Intestinal Research 2022;20(1):11-30
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), once considered a disease of the Western hemisphere, has emerged as a global disease. As the disease prevalence is on a steady rise, management of IBD has come under the spotlight. 5-Aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents and biologics are the backbone of treatment of IBD. With the advent of biologics and small molecules, the need for surgery and hospitalization has decreased. However, economic viability and acceptability is an important determinant of local prescription patterns. Nearly one-third of the patients in West receive biologics as the first/initial therapy. The scenario is different in developing countries where biologics are used only in a small proportion of patients with IBD. Increased risk of reactivation of tuberculosis and high cost of the therapy are limitations to their use. Thiopurines hence become critical for optimal management of patients with IBD in these regions. However, approximately one-third of patients are intolerant or develop adverse effects with their use. This has led to suboptimal use of thiopurines in clinical practice. This review article discusses the clinical aspects of thiopurine use in patients with IBD with the aim of optimizing their use to full therapeutic potential.