Objective:To improve the understanding of the diagnosis and treatment of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL).Methods:The clinical data of a patient with ETP-ALL who was misdiagnosed as peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) admitted to the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University in October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and the relevant literature was reviewed.Results:The patient who presented "inguinal lymphadenopathy" as the first symptom underwent lymph node biopsy and pathological examination at local hospital, and he was diagnosed as PTCL-NOS according to the consultation of another 2 hospitals. After 2 courses of chemotherapy (CHOPE regimen, GLD regimen, unknown specific medication and dosage), the therapeutic efficacy was poor. For further diagnosis and treatment, this patient came to Lanzhou University Second Hospital. Flow cytometry found blast cells in the bone marrow, and then other related examinations were completed, he was finally diagnosed as ETP-ALL. The chemotherapy regimens of Hyper-CVAD and EA were alternatively used, progressive disease (PD) occurred after 3 courses of treatment, and chidamide was added in the 4th and 5th courses of treatment, the disease still progressed, and the patient died after follow-up. The disease course of the patient was about 12 months.Conclusions:ETP-ALL has unique immunophenotypic characteristics. ETP-ALL patients have a low remission rate after conventional induction therapy, high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. Currently, there is no effective standard treatment regimen, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or timely addition of new drugs may improve the prognosis.

Objective To compare the efficacy, safety, and survivability of TCbHP versus AC-THP in the neoadjuvant therapy of HER2-positive breast cancer in real-world. Methods Clinical data of patients with HER2 positive breast cancer, who have received TCbHP or AC-THP as neoadjuvant therapy and completed surgery in 11 third-class hospitals in various cities of Hebei Province, were retrospectively collected.The total pathological complete remission (tpCR) rate, the incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse reactions and the completion rate of the given approaches were compared. Results A total of 110 cases were collected, including 78 cases in the TCbHP group and 32 cases in the AC-THP group.The tpCR rate of the TCbHP group was higher than that of the AC-THP group, but the difference was not statistically significant (64.10% vs. 56.25%, P=0.441).No significant difference was found in the breast pathologic complete response (bpCR) and axillary pathologic complete response (apCR) rates between the TCbHP group and the AC-THP group (70.51% vs. 56.25%, P=0.150;78.21% vs. 84.38%, P=0.462).Exploratory analysis revealed that the tpCR rate of the TCbHP group was significantly higher than that of the AC-THP group in patients with HR-positive breast cancer (51.11% vs. 22.22%, P=0.036).As for the patients with HR-negative breast cancer, the tpCR rate of the AC-THP group tended to be higher than that of the TCbHP group (100% vs. 81.82%, P=0.088).The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse reactions in the TCbHP group was slightly higher than that in the AC-THP group (12.82% vs. 9.38%, P=0.753).No deaths occurred in the whole group.Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the completion rate of the given approaches between the TCbHP group and the AC-THP group (92.31% vs. 90.63%, P=0.718). Conclusion In real-world clinical practice, the neoadjuvant therapy of TCbHP and AC-THP are effective, safe, and well tolerated among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.The tpCR rate between the two approaches was not significantly different.The AC-THP regimen could also be considered as one of the optimal regimens for HER2-positive breast cancer in neoadjuvant therapy.

Objective To provide reference for the optimization and improvement of interoperability between the standard system of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia and other standards.Methods The interoperability of various pharmacopoeia standard systems was compared by searching for citations from the Chinese Pharmacopoeia,the United States Pharmacopoeia-National Formulary,the European Pharmacopoeia,the Japanese Pharmacopoeia,and other standards,including references to domestic regulations and guidelines,standards of the International Organization for Standardization,guidelines from the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use,documents of the World Health Organization,and standards from other countries and international organizations.Results In recent years,pharmacopoeias in the world had continuously increased the citation of non pharmacopoeial standards.The types,quantities,and fields of the United States Pharmacopoeia-National Formulary referencing other standards far exceed those of other pharmacopoeias.The Chinese Pharmacopoeia cites the least number of other standards.Conclusion It is suggested that the Chinese Pharmacopoeia should enhance the interoperability with other standard systems in the standards of various professional fields,enhance the openness,harmonization and advantages,and form a more complete standard system.