Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of pre-extensive drug resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR-TB), and to explore the feasibility of using the standard multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) therapeutic regimen to treat the patients with pre-MDR-TB. Methods A retrospective analysis was made for 126 cases of the MDR-TB patients who were received the treatment in Guangzhou chest hospital from 2009 to 2013. It was divided into MDR-TB group, pre-XDR-TB group and XDR-TB group according to the drug sensitive test (DST) of quinolone(levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) and aminoglycoside (amikacin). All patients were treated for 6-months with the standard therapeutic regimen including Am(Cm), Lfx(Mfx), Pto, PAS and PZA. Results (1) There were 126 cases of the MDR-TB patients in the study, 31 cases (24.6%) complicate with aminoglycosides-resistance, 69 cases (54.7%) complicate with quinolone-resistance. (2) The negative rate of MDR-TB group, pre-XDR-TB group and XDR-TB group was 82.0%, 55.8% and 29.2% respectively (χ2 = 20.110, P < 0.001). (3)The negative rate of pre-XDR-TB group significantly lower than MDR-TB group (χ2 = 8.146, P = 0.004). The negative rate of pre-XDR-TB group higher than XDR-TB group (χ2= 4.661, P = 0.031). Conclusions The situation of quinolone and aminoglycoside resistance was high in the patients with MDR-TB. We should carry out the detection of quinolone and aminoglycoside resistance in clinical treatment. The clinical efficacy for the patients with pre-XDR-TB was significantly poorer than the patients with MDR-TB using the standard MDR-TB therapeutic regiment treated.

Objective To investigate the effects of different liver protective drugs on preventing liver injury induced by anti-tuberculosis drugs. Methods Retrospective analysis was made on 355 patients with primary pulmonary tuberculosis during intensified time. The patients received silibinon and bicyclol to prevent liver injury. 82 patients with TB were treated as control group during the same time. Results The number of patients with liver injury in silibinon group and bicyclol group were 16 cases (14.7%) and 55 cases (22.4%) respectively. The number of control group with liver injury was 9 cases (11.0%) (χ2 = 3.627,P > 0.05). The liver injuries within 4 weeks were mainly counted in. There is no difference between intervention and control groups(χ2 = 0.414,P > 0.05). There is no difference between three groups in liver injury degree (U = 0.288,P> 0.05). Conclusion Without high risk factors, anti-inflammatory and enzyme reduction drugs have no significant protective effects on liver injury caused by anti-tuberculosis drugs.

Objective To study the correlation of PAZ with anti-tuberculosis treatment regimen and drug-induced liver injury in tuberculosis patients with HBV-DNA positive in order to provide an optimized treatment regimen. Methods from Jan 2013 to Dec 2014, 199 pulmonary tuberculosis with HBV-DNA positive patients and 103 pulmonary tuberculosis patients without HBV in our hospital were collected. They were assigned as follows:122 cases were anti tuberculosis treatment with antiviral therapy,64 cases were A(HRZE),58 cases were B (HRE). 77 cases were anti tuberculosis treatment but not antiviral therapy , 41 cases were C (HRZE), 36 cases were D(HRE) and 103 patients without HBV were E (HRZE, the contrast group). We had observed the liver injury for 2 months after the treatment. Results 1.Incidence of liver injury was 34.38% in group A , higher than the cases in group B(20.69%,P > 0.05). 2.Incidence of liver injury in group C was apparently higher than in group D (73.17% vs. 30.56%,P < 0.05). 3.Incidence of liver injury in group B was lower than group D (20.69% vs. 30.56%,P > 0.05)4.Incidence of liver injury in group A was lower than group C (34.38% vs. 73.17%,P < 0.05).5. Incidence of liver injury in group A was higher than group E (34.38% vs. 17.48%,P< 0.05)and there was no difference between group B and group E (20.69% vs. 17.48%,P> 0.05). Conclusion Although anti tuberculosis treatment combined with antiviral therapy can be partially reduce the incidence of liver injury and relieve the severity of liver injury in tuberculosis patients infected with HBV , but PZA toxicity to hepatocytes is a major risk factor for liver injury , and we need to change the treatment plan to reduce the occurrence of liver injury.

Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics,treatment and prognosis of tuberculosis in patients with autoimmune diseases after tumor necrosis factor-αinhibitors.Methods Clinical data of 33 patients with TB after biologics(tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors)treated in Guangzhou Chest Hospital from January 2019 to March 2023 were collected,including 25 males and 8 females,with a median age of 32 years.The clinical symptoms,laboratory results,imaging and tracheoscopic features,pathological features,treatment and outcome were analyzed retrospectively.Results The common clinical manifestations were cough(26/33),sputum(23/33)and fever(17/33).The most common cases were pulmonary tuberculosis(32/33),bronchial tuberculosis(15/33),mediastinum and hilar lymph node tuberculosis(11/33).Bilateral lung spread of tuberculosis(21/33),intrapulmonary spread of tuberculosis(bronchus,mediastinal hilar lymph nodes,pleura)(19/33),extrapulmonary tuberculosis(18/33),pulmonary tuberculosis with intrapulmonary or extrapulmonary tuberculosis(26/33).Blood CD4+T lymphocyte test was normal(23/33),and blood IGRA test was positive(27/33).Pulmonary imaging miliary nodules(8/33).The histopathology of the lymph nodes showed atypical granulomatous nodules.The duration of anti-tuberculosis treatment is 8-32 months.1 case of death.Conclusion Patients with autoimmune diseases complicated with tuberculosis after the application of tumor necrosis fact-α inhibitor are more likely to have double lung lesions,which are easy to spread to lung tissues and multiple organs of the body,and have decreased immune function.Most of them need to extend the treatment course,and the prognosis is generally good after comprehensive treatment.