1.Mechanism study of 6-shogaol alleviating cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury by regulating microRNA-26a-5p/death-associated protein kinase 1
Shixin LI ; Ouyang RAO ; Ning ZHU ; Hangxiang ZHOU ; Junling TAO ; Yehong LI ; Ying LIU
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2024;36(6):616-623
Objective:To investigate whether 6-shogaol (6-SH) alleviates oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R)-induced neuronal autophagy and calcium overload by promoting the expression of microRNA-26a-5p (miR-26a-5p) and inhibiting death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1), and to explore its potential mechanisms.Methods:Primary cultured logarithmic growth phase mouse hippocampal neurons HT22 cells were taken and cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) was used to detect cell viability, searching for the optimal concentration of Na 2S 2O 4. HT22 cells were divided into blank control group (NC group), OGD/R group (sugar-free culture medium + 10 mmol/L Na 2S 2O 4 treatment for 1.5 hours followed by normal culture medium for 4 hours), 6-SH intervention group (cultured with 10 μmol/L 6-SH for 4 hours after OGD), negative control inhibitor pretreatment group (transfected with negative control inhibitor for 48 hours followed by OGD, then cultured with 6-SH for 4 hours), and miR-26a-5p inhibitor pretreatment group (transfected with miR-26a-5p inhibitor for 48 hours followed by OGD, then cultured with 6-SH for 4 hours). Cell viability of each group was detected by CCK-8 method; cell ultrastructure was observed under transmission electron microscopy; real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to detect the gene expressions of DAPK1 and miR-26a-5p; molecular docking were used to verify the interaction between 6-SH and miR-26a-5p; dual-luciferase assay was used to verify the targeting relationship between DAPK1 and miR-26a-5p; flow cytometry was used to determine the levels of intracellular Ca 2+; Western blotting was used to detect the protein expressions of phosphorylated-glutamate receptor 2B (p-NMDAR2B) Ser1303, DAPK1, autophagy related protein Beclin1, light chain 3 (LC3), and p-DAPK1 Ser308; immunofluorescence was used to detect the expression of LC3 and Beclin1. Results:The results of the CCK-8 assay showed that the cell viability of the 6-SH intervention group was significantly increased compared to the OGD/R group, while the cell viability of the miR-26a-5p inhibitor pretreatment group was significantly decreased compared to the 6-SH intervention group. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that the number of autophagosomes in the 6-SH intervention group was significantly reduced compared to the OGD/R group, while the number of autophagosomes in the miR-26a-5p inhibitor pretreatment group was significantly increased compared to the 6-SH intervention group. RT-qPCR results showed that compared with the OGD/R group, the expression of miR-26a-5p was significantly upregulated and the expression of DAPK1 mRNA was significantly downregulated in the 6-SH intervention group; compared with the 6-SH intervention group, the expression of miR-26a-5p was significantly downregulated and the expression of DAPK1 mRNA was significantly upregulated in the miR-26a-5p inhibitor pretreatment group. Molecular docking verified the interaction between 6-SH and miR-26a-5p. Dual-luciferase reporter gene assay showed that compared with the negative control group, mmu-miR-26a-5p significantly downregulated the luciferase expression of m-DAPK1-3UTR-WT, indicating a binding interaction between them. Flow cytometry results showed that compared with the OGD/R group, the level of intracellular Ca 2+ was significantly decreased in the 6-SH intervention group; compared with the 6-SH intervention group, the level of Ca 2+ was significantly increased in the miR-26a-5p inhibitor pretreatment group. Western blotting results showed that compared with the OGD/R group, the protein expressions of p-NMDAR2B Ser1303, DAPK1, Beclin1, and LC3 were significantly decreased in the 6-SH intervention group (p-NMDAR2B Ser1303/β-actin: 2.34±0.27 vs. 4.78±0.39, DAPK1/β-actin: 1.40±0.13 vs. 2.37±0.21, Beclin1/β-actin: 2.61±0.32 vs. 4.32±0.29, LC3/β-actin: 2.52±0.45 vs. 5.09±0.18, all P < 0.05), while the protein expression of p-DAPK1 Ser308 was significantly increased (p-DAPK1 Ser308/β-actin: 0.66±0.09 vs. 0.40±0.02, P < 0.05); compared with the 6-SH intervention group, the protein expressions of p-NMDAR2B Ser1303, DAPK1, Beclin1, and LC3 were significantly increased in the miR-26a-5p inhibitor pretreatment group (p-NMDAR2B Ser1303/β-actin: 4.08±0.14 vs. 2.34±0.27, DAPK1/β-actin: 1.96±0.15 vs. 1.40±0.13, Beclin1/β-actin: 3.92±0.31 vs. 2.61±0.32, LC3/β-actin: 4.33±0.33 vs. 2.52±0.45, all P < 0.05), while the expression of p-DAPK1 Ser308 protein was significantly decreased (p-DAPK1 Ser308/β-actin: 0.33±0.12 vs. 0.66±0.09, P < 0.05); immunofluorescence staining showed that compared with the OGD/R group, the fluorescence intensity of LC3 and Beclin1 was significantly decreased in the 6-SH intervention group; compared with the 6-SH intervention group, the fluorescence intensity of LC3 and Beclin1 was significantly increased in the miR-26a-5p inhibitor pretreatment group. Conclusion:6-SH can alleviate neuronal damage by regulating miR-26a-5p/DAPK1 to reduce autophagy and calcium overload in cells.
2.Application of continuous renal replacement therapy in coronavirus disease 2019
Jiao LIU ; Yu ZHOU ; Minmin WANG ; Yongan LIU ; Hangxiang DU ; Tao WANG ; Lidi ZHANG ; Yizhu CHEN ; Dechang CHEN
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2020;32(5):618-621
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has become an effective multiple organ support therapy instead of single renal replacement as initially expected, and it is widely used in intensive care unit (ICU). After the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a series of expert recommendation or consensus have been developed to diagnose and treat the disease, including CRRT in acute kidney injury (AKI) and hyper inflammatory response. However, CRRT in COVID-19 is extraordinarily different from regular one due to different pathophysiology and infectious clinical scenarios. Accordingly, the paper aims to elaborate the similarities and differences between CRRT in COVID-19 and routine treatment in terms of safety and accessibility, indications and timing, clinical operation, anticoagulation, fluid management, prevention and control of infectious diseases, etc.