1.Local administration of halofuginone via osmotic infusion pumps inhibits transforming growth factor-β signaling in subchondral bone
Zhuang CUI ; Ting XU ; Hangtian WU ; Hanjun QIN ; Bin YU
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2019;21(1):50-56
Objective To explore the impact of inhibition of transforming growth factor-β(TGF-β) signaling by local administration of halofuginone (HF) via osmotic infusion pumps on osteoarthritis (OA) pathogenesis and its underlying mechanism.Methods Knee OA models were induced by the anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) in 30 3-month-old male SD rats.They were randomized by random number table into 3 equal groups (n =10):Sham,Vehicle + ACLT and HF + ACLT ones.Specific administration of drugs was achieved via osmotic infusion pumps directly implanted in subchondral bone.Safranin 0 and fast green,H&E,immunofluorescence staining,CT-based microangiography and bone micro-CT (μCT) were used to measure alterations in articular cartilage and subchondral bone [BV(bone volume)/TV (tissue volume),Tb.Pf (trabecular pattern factor),Tb.N (trabecular number),SBP.Th(subchondral bone plate.Th),pSmad2/3,Nestin,and OARSI (Osteoarthritis Research Society International) scoring].Results Knee OA models and drug administration devices in subchondral bone were successfully established in rats.Sham and HF + ACLT groups had greater subchondral BV/TV(0.381 ± 0.060 mm3 and 0.322 ±0.060 mm3),SBP.Th (0.570 ±0.042 mm and 0.521 ±0.122 mm) and Tb.N (4.871 ±0.214 mm-1 and 4.364 ±0.466 mm-1) than Vehicle +ACLT group did (0.229±0.063) mm3,0.324±0.165 mm and 2.978±0.804 mm-1,respectively);Sham and HF +ACLT groups had less subchondral Tb.Pf (-0.880 ±0.210 mm-1 and -0.377±0.259 mm-1),lower expression of pSmad2/3 (90.2±40.0 and 90.8±34.5) and Nestin (16.9 ± 5.8 and 18.5 ± 4.7) and OARSI scores (1.2 ± 0.7 and 2.5 ± 1.9) than Vehicle + A CLT group did (0.057 ± 0.535 mm-1,142.7 ± 37.0,25.9 ± 7.4 and 5.4 ± 2.8,respectively).All the above differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).There were no significant differences between Sham and HF + A-CLT groups in subchondral BV/TV,Tb.Pf,Tb.Pf,SBP.Th,Tb.N,expression of pSmad2/3 or Nestin,or OARSI scores (P > 0.05).Conclusion Subchondral administration of HF can inhibit TGF-β induced erroneous recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells in subchondral bone,thus attenuating OA progression.
2.High-throughput screening identifies established drugs as SARS-CoV-2 PLpro inhibitors.
Yao ZHAO ; Xiaoyu DU ; Yinkai DUAN ; Xiaoyan PAN ; Yifang SUN ; Tian YOU ; Lin HAN ; Zhenming JIN ; Weijuan SHANG ; Jing YU ; Hangtian GUO ; Qianying LIU ; Yan WU ; Chao PENG ; Jun WANG ; Chenghao ZHU ; Xiuna YANG ; Kailin YANG ; Ying LEI ; Luke W GUDDAT ; Wenqing XU ; Gengfu XIAO ; Lei SUN ; Leike ZHANG ; Zihe RAO ; Haitao YANG
Protein & Cell 2021;12(11):877-888
A new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has been identified as the etiologic agent for the COVID-19 outbreak. Currently, effective treatment options remain very limited for this disease; therefore, there is an urgent need to identify new anti-COVID-19 agents. In this study, we screened over 6,000 compounds that included approved drugs, drug candidates in clinical trials, and pharmacologically active compounds to identify leads that target the SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease (PLpro). Together with main protease (M
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use*
;
Binding Sites
;
COVID-19/virology*
;
Coronavirus Papain-Like Proteases/metabolism*
;
Crystallography, X-Ray
;
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
;
Drug Repositioning
;
High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods*
;
Humans
;
Imidazoles/therapeutic use*
;
Inhibitory Concentration 50
;
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
;
Mutagenesis, Site-Directed
;
Naphthoquinones/therapeutic use*
;
Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use*
;
Protein Structure, Tertiary
;
Recombinant Proteins/isolation & purification*
;
SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification*
3.A core epitope targeting antibody of SARS-CoV-2.
Simeng ZHAO ; Fengjiang LIU ; Shizhen QIU ; Qiaoshuai LAN ; Yiran WU ; Wei XU ; Junzi KE ; Jie YANG ; Xiaoyan LIU ; Kun WANG ; Hangtian GUO ; Shuai XIA ; Fangfang ZHANG ; Jiabei WANG ; Xiaowen HU ; Lu LU ; Shibo JIANG ; Suwen ZHAO ; Lianxin LIU ; Youhua XIE ; Xiuna YANG ; Haopeng WANG ; Guisheng ZHONG
Protein & Cell 2023;14(1):74-78