Hemorrhagic trauma is a major preventable cause of mortality in critically injured patients. Rapid surgical interventions are essential for hemostasis. Comprehensive critical care management before and after surgery significantly enhances the patient survival. Damage control resuscitation (DCR) concept has been adapted from the damage control method of the United States Navy, which outlines immediate temporary measures to prevent a ship from sinking, followed by the definitive repair of the ship at a dock.Current Concepts: DCR combined with damage control surgery focuses on controlling life-threatening hemorrhages and preventing trauma-induced coagulopathy. Key aspects of this strategy are: (1) Permissive hypotension (avoiding excessive fluid resuscitation to reduce re-bleeding risk), (2) restricted fluid and hemostatic resuscitation (limiting fluids and using blood products to promote coagulation), (3) use of antifibrinolytics (administering tranexamic acid to inhibit fibrinolysis and stabilize clots), (4) hypothermia prevention (maintaining normothermia to promote coagulation and mitigate acidosis), (5) calcium maintenance (maintaining normal calcium levels for proper cardiac function and coagulation), and (6) use of vasopressors (for stabilizing blood pressure and tissue perfusion). By integrating these aspects, DCR effectively controls immediate bleeding and overcomes systemic physiological challenges, thereby improving the survival of patients with severe trauma.Discussion and Conclusion: Implementation of DCR with surgical interventions as a bundle of care effectively manages hemorrhagic trauma, possibly saving the patient. Therefore, DCR is a cornerstone strategy to improve the survival of patients with hemorrhagic trauma.

Hemorrhagic trauma is a major preventable cause of mortality in critically injured patients. Rapid surgical interventions are essential for hemostasis. Comprehensive critical care management before and after surgery significantly enhances the patient survival. Damage control resuscitation (DCR) concept has been adapted from the damage control method of the United States Navy, which outlines immediate temporary measures to prevent a ship from sinking, followed by the definitive repair of the ship at a dock.Current Concepts: DCR combined with damage control surgery focuses on controlling life-threatening hemorrhages and preventing trauma-induced coagulopathy. Key aspects of this strategy are: (1) Permissive hypotension (avoiding excessive fluid resuscitation to reduce re-bleeding risk), (2) restricted fluid and hemostatic resuscitation (limiting fluids and using blood products to promote coagulation), (3) use of antifibrinolytics (administering tranexamic acid to inhibit fibrinolysis and stabilize clots), (4) hypothermia prevention (maintaining normothermia to promote coagulation and mitigate acidosis), (5) calcium maintenance (maintaining normal calcium levels for proper cardiac function and coagulation), and (6) use of vasopressors (for stabilizing blood pressure and tissue perfusion). By integrating these aspects, DCR effectively controls immediate bleeding and overcomes systemic physiological challenges, thereby improving the survival of patients with severe trauma.Discussion and Conclusion: Implementation of DCR with surgical interventions as a bundle of care effectively manages hemorrhagic trauma, possibly saving the patient. Therefore, DCR is a cornerstone strategy to improve the survival of patients with hemorrhagic trauma.

Hemorrhagic trauma is a major preventable cause of mortality in critically injured patients. Rapid surgical interventions are essential for hemostasis. Comprehensive critical care management before and after surgery significantly enhances the patient survival. Damage control resuscitation (DCR) concept has been adapted from the damage control method of the United States Navy, which outlines immediate temporary measures to prevent a ship from sinking, followed by the definitive repair of the ship at a dock.Current Concepts: DCR combined with damage control surgery focuses on controlling life-threatening hemorrhages and preventing trauma-induced coagulopathy. Key aspects of this strategy are: (1) Permissive hypotension (avoiding excessive fluid resuscitation to reduce re-bleeding risk), (2) restricted fluid and hemostatic resuscitation (limiting fluids and using blood products to promote coagulation), (3) use of antifibrinolytics (administering tranexamic acid to inhibit fibrinolysis and stabilize clots), (4) hypothermia prevention (maintaining normothermia to promote coagulation and mitigate acidosis), (5) calcium maintenance (maintaining normal calcium levels for proper cardiac function and coagulation), and (6) use of vasopressors (for stabilizing blood pressure and tissue perfusion). By integrating these aspects, DCR effectively controls immediate bleeding and overcomes systemic physiological challenges, thereby improving the survival of patients with severe trauma.Discussion and Conclusion: Implementation of DCR with surgical interventions as a bundle of care effectively manages hemorrhagic trauma, possibly saving the patient. Therefore, DCR is a cornerstone strategy to improve the survival of patients with hemorrhagic trauma.

Purpose: Proper use of antibiotics during emergency abdominal surgery is essential in reducing the incidence of surgical site infection. However, no studies have investigated the type of antibiotics and duration of therapy in individuals with abdominal trauma in Korea. We aimed to investigate the status of initial antibiotic therapy in patients with solitary abdominal trauma. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2015, we retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with solitary abdominal trauma from 17 institutions including regional trauma centers in South Korea. Both blunt and penetrating abdominal injuries were included. Time from arrival to initial antibiotic therapy, rate of antibiotic use upon injury mechanism, injured organ, type, and duration of antibiotic use, and postoperative infection were investigated. Results: Data of the 311 patients were collected. The use of antibiotic was initiated in 96.4% of patients with penetrating injury and 79.7% with blunt injury. Initial antibiotics therapy was provided to 78.2% of patients with solid organ injury and 97.5% with hollow viscus injury. The mean day of using antibiotics was 6 days in solid organ injuries, 6.2 days in hollow viscus. Infection within 2 weeks of admission occurred in 36 cases. Infection was related to injury severity (Abbreviated Injury Scale of >3), hollow viscus injury, operation, open abdomen, colon perforation, and RBC transfusion. There was no infection in cases with laparoscopic operation. Duration of antibiotics did not affect the infection rate. Conclusion Antibiotics are used extensively (84.2%) and for long duration (6.2 days) in patients with abdominal injury in Korea.

PURPOSE: A task force appointed by the Korean Society of Acute Care Surgery reviewed previously published guidelines on antibiotic use in patients with abdominal injuries and adapted guidelines for Korea. METHODS: Four guidelines were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. Five topics were considered: indication for antibiotics, time until first antibiotic use, antibiotic therapy duration, appropriate antibiotics, and antibiotic use in abdominal trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock. RESULTS: Patients requiring surgery need preoperative prophylactic antibiotics. Patients who do not require surgery do not need antibiotics. Antibiotics should be administered as soon as possible after injury. In the absence of hollow viscus injury, no additional antibiotic doses are needed. If hollow viscus injury is repaired within 12 hours, antibiotics should be continued for ≤ 24 hours. If hollow viscus injury is repaired after 12 hours, antibiotics should be limited to 7 days. Antibiotics can be administered for ≥7 days if hollow viscus injury is incompletely repaired or clinical signs persist. Broad-spectrum aerobic and anaerobic coverage antibiotics are preferred as the initial antibiotics. Second-generation cephalosporins are the recommended initial antibiotics. Third-generation cephalosporins are alternative choices. For hemorrhagic shock, the antibiotic dose may be increased twofold or threefold and repeated after transfusion of every 10 units of blood until there is no further blood loss. CONCLUSION: Although this guideline was drafted through adaptation of other guidelines, it may be meaningful in that it provides a consensus on the use of antibiotics in abdominal trauma patients in Korea.
Abdominal Injuries* ; Advisory Committees ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Cephalosporins ; Consensus ; Humans ; Korea ; Shock, Hemorrhagic