1.A multicenter micro-costing analysis of flexible cystoscopic procedures in Korea
Uiemo JE ; Woong Kyu HAN ; Hee-Kyo JEONG ; Hankil LEE ; Kwang Suk LEE ; Sung Ku KANG ; Byeong-Ju KWON ; Sung-Uk KUH
Investigative and Clinical Urology 2025;66(1):87-96
Purpose:
This study aims to develop and implement an economic evaluation using a micro-costing approach to provide a precise and transparent analysis of the direct costs of cystoscopic procedures in Korean hospitals. The study seeks to identify key cost components and evaluate whether current reimbursement rates accurately reflect these direct costs.
Materials and Methods:
Significant variations in cost items were identified across different studies. An economic evaluation was conducted using a micro-costing methodology for the cost analysis of cystoscopic procedures, developed through literature review, data collection from studies, and expert consultations.
Results:
Gangnam Severance Hospital (GSH) performed 2,188 cystoscopic procedures, including 1,847 cystoscopies and 341 JJ stent removals, with average costs of $100.8 and $110.6, respectively. At National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital (NHIMC), 1,463 procedures were performed, including 1,167 cystoscopies and 296 JJ stent removals, with average costs of $119.2 and $125.3. Cystoscopy costs at GSH were driven by reprocessing ($45.8, 45.4%) and equipment ($33.1, 32.9%), while NHIMC’s were $52.5 (44.0%) for equipment and $48.7 (40.8%) for reprocessing. Both hospitals incurred financial losses, with NHIS (National Health Insurance Service) covering only about 71.7% and 60.6% of costs for cystoscopy, and 71.0% and 62.7% for JJ stent removal.
Conclusions
The significant discrepancy between HIRA (Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service)’s estimated costs and those identified here suggests that current fees for cystoscopic procedures may be underestimated and require reassessment.Given the results, reevaluating these rates is essential to ensure fair compensation for healthcare providers and to deliver optimal patient care.
2.Risk factors for Implant Failure in Thoracolumbar Fractures Treated with Posterior Long-Segment Instrumentation
Han-Dong LEE ; Nam-Su CHUNG ; Je-Yoon LEE ; Hee-Woong CHUNG
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2024;16(6):863-870
Background:
Posterior long-segment instrumentation (PLSI) enables the stable repair of thoracolumbar fractures (TLFx) and is thus widely used. However, patients with highly unstable fractures may experience implant failure and related complications (e.g., pain and kyphosis) despite PLSI. Few studies have considered the implant failure rate and risk factors associated with PLSI for TLFx.
Methods:
This study reviewed 162 consecutive patients with TLFx who underwent PLSI and completed > 1 year of follow-up between April 2011 and December 2019. Implant failure was defined as rod breakage, cap dislodgement, or screw breakage. Risk factors for implant failure were evaluated by multivariate regression analysis that included demographic, injury-related, and surgical factors.
Results:
There were 15 cases (9.3%) of implant failure at the final follow-up (mean, 28.0 ± 18.0 months). Current smoker at the time of injury, fracture level, load sharing score, and anterior compression ratio (ACR) significantly differed between the implant failure and control groups (all p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified current smoker at the time of injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.924; 95% CI, 1.405–24.988), mid to low lumbar fracture (aOR, 15.977; 95% CI, 4.064–62.810), and ACR (aOR, 1.061; 95% CI, 1.009–1.115) as predictors of implant failure.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated a high implant failure rate in patients with TLFx treated with PLSI. Smoking at the time of injury, mid to low lumbar fracture, and higher ACR were identified as significant risk factors for implant failure. These findings can help guide treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes in TLFx surgery.
3.Risk factors for Implant Failure in Thoracolumbar Fractures Treated with Posterior Long-Segment Instrumentation
Han-Dong LEE ; Nam-Su CHUNG ; Je-Yoon LEE ; Hee-Woong CHUNG
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2024;16(6):863-870
Background:
Posterior long-segment instrumentation (PLSI) enables the stable repair of thoracolumbar fractures (TLFx) and is thus widely used. However, patients with highly unstable fractures may experience implant failure and related complications (e.g., pain and kyphosis) despite PLSI. Few studies have considered the implant failure rate and risk factors associated with PLSI for TLFx.
Methods:
This study reviewed 162 consecutive patients with TLFx who underwent PLSI and completed > 1 year of follow-up between April 2011 and December 2019. Implant failure was defined as rod breakage, cap dislodgement, or screw breakage. Risk factors for implant failure were evaluated by multivariate regression analysis that included demographic, injury-related, and surgical factors.
Results:
There were 15 cases (9.3%) of implant failure at the final follow-up (mean, 28.0 ± 18.0 months). Current smoker at the time of injury, fracture level, load sharing score, and anterior compression ratio (ACR) significantly differed between the implant failure and control groups (all p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified current smoker at the time of injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.924; 95% CI, 1.405–24.988), mid to low lumbar fracture (aOR, 15.977; 95% CI, 4.064–62.810), and ACR (aOR, 1.061; 95% CI, 1.009–1.115) as predictors of implant failure.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated a high implant failure rate in patients with TLFx treated with PLSI. Smoking at the time of injury, mid to low lumbar fracture, and higher ACR were identified as significant risk factors for implant failure. These findings can help guide treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes in TLFx surgery.
4.Risk factors for Implant Failure in Thoracolumbar Fractures Treated with Posterior Long-Segment Instrumentation
Han-Dong LEE ; Nam-Su CHUNG ; Je-Yoon LEE ; Hee-Woong CHUNG
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2024;16(6):863-870
Background:
Posterior long-segment instrumentation (PLSI) enables the stable repair of thoracolumbar fractures (TLFx) and is thus widely used. However, patients with highly unstable fractures may experience implant failure and related complications (e.g., pain and kyphosis) despite PLSI. Few studies have considered the implant failure rate and risk factors associated with PLSI for TLFx.
Methods:
This study reviewed 162 consecutive patients with TLFx who underwent PLSI and completed > 1 year of follow-up between April 2011 and December 2019. Implant failure was defined as rod breakage, cap dislodgement, or screw breakage. Risk factors for implant failure were evaluated by multivariate regression analysis that included demographic, injury-related, and surgical factors.
Results:
There were 15 cases (9.3%) of implant failure at the final follow-up (mean, 28.0 ± 18.0 months). Current smoker at the time of injury, fracture level, load sharing score, and anterior compression ratio (ACR) significantly differed between the implant failure and control groups (all p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified current smoker at the time of injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.924; 95% CI, 1.405–24.988), mid to low lumbar fracture (aOR, 15.977; 95% CI, 4.064–62.810), and ACR (aOR, 1.061; 95% CI, 1.009–1.115) as predictors of implant failure.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated a high implant failure rate in patients with TLFx treated with PLSI. Smoking at the time of injury, mid to low lumbar fracture, and higher ACR were identified as significant risk factors for implant failure. These findings can help guide treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes in TLFx surgery.
5.Risk factors for Implant Failure in Thoracolumbar Fractures Treated with Posterior Long-Segment Instrumentation
Han-Dong LEE ; Nam-Su CHUNG ; Je-Yoon LEE ; Hee-Woong CHUNG
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2024;16(6):863-870
Background:
Posterior long-segment instrumentation (PLSI) enables the stable repair of thoracolumbar fractures (TLFx) and is thus widely used. However, patients with highly unstable fractures may experience implant failure and related complications (e.g., pain and kyphosis) despite PLSI. Few studies have considered the implant failure rate and risk factors associated with PLSI for TLFx.
Methods:
This study reviewed 162 consecutive patients with TLFx who underwent PLSI and completed > 1 year of follow-up between April 2011 and December 2019. Implant failure was defined as rod breakage, cap dislodgement, or screw breakage. Risk factors for implant failure were evaluated by multivariate regression analysis that included demographic, injury-related, and surgical factors.
Results:
There were 15 cases (9.3%) of implant failure at the final follow-up (mean, 28.0 ± 18.0 months). Current smoker at the time of injury, fracture level, load sharing score, and anterior compression ratio (ACR) significantly differed between the implant failure and control groups (all p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified current smoker at the time of injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.924; 95% CI, 1.405–24.988), mid to low lumbar fracture (aOR, 15.977; 95% CI, 4.064–62.810), and ACR (aOR, 1.061; 95% CI, 1.009–1.115) as predictors of implant failure.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated a high implant failure rate in patients with TLFx treated with PLSI. Smoking at the time of injury, mid to low lumbar fracture, and higher ACR were identified as significant risk factors for implant failure. These findings can help guide treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes in TLFx surgery.
6.Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment
Hyo Seon RYU ; Hyun Jung KIM ; Woong Bae JI ; Byung Chang KIM ; Ji Hun KIM ; Sung Kyung MOON ; Sung Il KANG ; Han Deok KWAK ; Eun Sun KIM ; Chang Hyun KIM ; Tae Hyung KIM ; Gyoung Tae NOH ; Byung-Soo PARK ; Hyeung-Min PARK ; Jeong Mo BAE ; Jung Hoon BAE ; Ni Eun SEO ; Chang Hoon SONG ; Mi Sun AHN ; Jae Seon EO ; Young Chul YOON ; Joon-Kee YOON ; Kyung Ha LEE ; Kyung Hee LEE ; Kil-Yong LEE ; Myung Su LEE ; Sung Hak LEE ; Jong Min LEE ; Ji Eun LEE ; Han Hee LEE ; Myong Hoon IHN ; Je-Ho JANG ; Sun Kyung JEON ; Kum Ju CHAE ; Jin-Ho CHOI ; Dae Hee PYO ; Gi Won HA ; Kyung Su HAN ; Young Ki HONG ; Chang Won HONG ; Jung-Myun KWAK ;
Annals of Coloproctology 2024;40(2):89-113
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients’ values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.
7.Korean Thyroid Association Guidelines on the Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancers; Overview and Summary 2024
Young Joo PARK ; Eun Kyung LEE ; Young Shin SONG ; Bon Seok KOO ; Hyungju KWON ; Keunyoung KIM ; Mijin KIM ; Bo Hyun KIM ; Won Gu KIM ; Won Bae KIM ; Won Woong KIM ; Jung-Han KIM ; Hee Kyung KIM ; Hee Young NA ; Shin Je MOON ; Jung-Eun MOON ; Sohyun PARK ; Jun-Ook PARK ; Ji-In BANG ; Kyorim BACK ; Youngduk SEO ; Dong Yeob SHIN ; Su-Jin SHIN ; Hwa Young AHN ; So Won OH ; Seung Hoon WOO ; Ho-Ryun WON ; Chang Hwan RYU ; Jee Hee YOON ; Ka Hee YI ; Min Kyoung LEE ; Sang-Woo LEE ; Seung Eun LEE ; Sihoon LEE ; Young Ah LEE ; Joon-Hyop LEE ; Ji Ye LEE ; Jieun LEE ; Cho Rok LEE ; Dong-Jun LIM ; Jae-Yol LIM ; Yun Kyung JEON ; Kyong Yeun JUNG ; Ari CHONG ; Yun Jae CHUNG ; Chan Kwon JUNG ; Kwanhoon JO ; Yoon Young CHO ; A Ram HONG ; Chae Moon HONG ; Ho-Cheol KANG ; Sun Wook KIM ; Woong Youn CHUNG ; Do Joon PARK ; Dong Gyu NA ;
International Journal of Thyroidology 2024;17(1):1-20
Differentiated thyroid cancer demonstrates a wide range of clinical presentations, from very indolent cases to those with an aggressive prognosis. Therefore, diagnosing and treating each cancer appropriately based on its risk status is important. The Korean Thyroid Association (KTA) has provided and amended the clinical guidelines for thyroid cancer management since 2007. The main changes in this revised 2024 guideline include 1) individualization of surgical extent according to pathological tests and clinical findings, 2) application of active surveillance in low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma, 3) indications for minimally invasive surgery, 4) adoption of World Health Organization pathological diagnostic criteria and definition of terminology in Korean, 5) update on literature evidence of recurrence risk for initial risk stratification, 6) addition of the role of molecular testing, 7) addition of definition of initial risk stratification and targeting thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations according to ongoing risk stratification (ORS), 8) addition of treatment of perioperative hypoparathyroidism, 9) update on systemic chemotherapy, and 10) addition of treatment for pediatric patients with thyroid cancer.
9.Hepatitis B Prophylaxis after Liver Transplantation in Korea: Analysis of the KOTRY Database
Gil Chun PARK ; Shin HWANG ; Myoung Soo KIM ; Dong Hwan JUNG ; Gi Won SONG ; Kwang Woong LEE ; Jong Man KIM ; Jae Geun LEE ; Je Ho RYU ; Dong Lak CHOI ; Hee Jung WANG ; Bong Wan KIM ; Dong Sik KIM ; Yang Won NAH ; Young Kyoung YOU ; Koo Jeong KANG ; Hee Chul YU ; Yo Han PARK ; Kyung Jin LEE ; Yun Kyu KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2020;35(6):e36-
BACKGROUND:
Prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence is essential after liver transplantation (LT) in HBV-associated recipients. We conducted real-world analysis of HBV prophylaxis after LT in the Korean population.
METHODS:
Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) database and additionally collected data (n = 326) were analyzed with special reference to types of HBV prophylaxis.
RESULTS:
The study cohort comprised 267 cases of living-donor LT and 59 cases of deceased-donor LT. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was diagnosed in 232 (71.2%) of these subjects. Antiviral agents were used in 255 patients (78.2%) prior to LT. HBV DNA was undetectable in 69 cases (21.2%) and detectable over wide concentrations in the other 257 patients (78.8%) prior to LT. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of the store blood samples detected HBV DNA in all patients, with 159 patients (48.9%) showing concentrations > 100 IU/mL. Post-transplant HBV regimens during the first year included combination therapy in 196 (60.1%), hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) monotherapy in 121 (37.1%), and antiviral monotherapy in 9 (2.8%). In the second post-transplant year, these regimens had changed to combination therapy in 187 (57.4%), HBIG monotherapy in 112 (34.4%), and antiviral monotherapy in 27 (8.3%). Trough antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen titers > 500 IU/mL and >1,000 IU/mL were observed in 61.7% and 25.2%, respectively. The mean simulative half-life of HBIG was 21.6 ± 4.3 days with a median 17.7 days. Up to 2-year follow-up period, HCC recurrence and HBV recurrence developed in 18 (5.5%) and 6 (1.8%), respectively. HCC recurrence developed in 3 of 6 patients with HBV recurrence.
CONCLUSION
Combination therapy is the mainstay of HBV prophylaxis protocols in a majority of Korean LT centers, but HBIG was often administered excessively. Individualized optimization of HBIG treatments using SHL is necessary to adjust the HBIG infusion interval.
10.Clinical Guidance for Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency and Critical Care Areas after Implementing Insurance Coverage in Korea
Wook Jin CHOI ; Young Rock HA ; Je Hyeok OH ; Young Soon CHO ; Won Woong LEE ; You Dong SOHN ; Gyu Chong CHO ; Chan Young KOH ; Han Ho DO ; Won Joon JEONG ; Seung Mok RYOO ; Jae Hyun KWON ; Hyung Min KIM ; Su Jin KIM ; Chan Yong PARK ; Jin Hee LEE ; Jae Hoon LEE ; Dong Hyun LEE ; Sin Youl PARK ; Bo Seung KANG
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2020;35(7):e54-
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a useful tool that is widely used in the emergency and intensive care areas. In Korea, insurance coverage of ultrasound examination has been gradually expanding in accordance with measures to enhance Korean National Insurance Coverage since 2017 to 2021, and which will continue until 2021. Full coverage of health insurance for POCUS in the emergency and critical care areas was implemented in July 2019. The National Health Insurance Act classified POCUS as a single or multiple-targeted ultrasound examination (STU vs. MTU). STU scans are conducted of one organ at a time, while MTU includes scanning of multiple organs simultaneously to determine each clinical situation. POCUS can be performed even if a diagnostic ultrasound examination is conducted, based on the physician's decision. However, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service plans to monitor the prescription status of whether the POCUS and diagnostic ultrasound examinations are prescribed simultaneously and repeatedly. Additionally, MTU is allowed only in cases of trauma, cardiac arrest, shock, chest pain, and dyspnea and should be performed by a qualified physician. Although physicians should scan all parts of the chest, heart, and abdomen when they prescribe MTU, they are not required to record all findings in the medical record. Therefore, appropriate prescription, application, and recording of POCUS are needed to enhance the quality of patient care and avoid unnecessary cut of medical budget spending. The present article provides background and clinical guidance for POCUS based on the implementation of full health insurance coverage for POCUS that began in July 2019 in Korea.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail