1.Early Satiety Is the Only Patient-Reported Symptom Associated With Delayed Gastric Emptying, as Assessed by Breath-Test.
Yishai RON ; Ami D SPERBER ; Arie LEVINE ; Orit SHEVAH ; Ram DICKMAN ; Yona AVNI ; Haim SHIRIN
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2011;17(1):61-66
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate associations between delayed gastric emptying (GE) assessed by the octanoic acid breath test and upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. METHODS: A historical, prospective study included 111 consecutive symptomatic adults referred for a GE breath test because of upper abdominal symptoms suggestive of delayed GE. Exclusion criteria included underlying organic disease associated with delayed GE. Patients completed a symptom questionnaire and underwent a GE octanoic breath test. Patients with delayed GE were compared with those with normal results, for upper GI symptoms. RESULTS: Early satiety was the only symptom significantly associated with delayed GE. It was observed in 52% of subjects with delayed GE compared to 33% patients with no evidence of delayed GE (P = 0.005). This association was seen for all degrees of severity of delayed GE. Patients with early satiety had a t1/2 of 153.9 +/- 84.6 minutes compared to 110.9 +/- 47.6 minutes in subjects without it (P = 0.002). In a logistic regression model, early satiety was significantly associated with delayed GE (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.01-5.18; P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Early satiety is the only patient-reported GI symptom associated with delayed GE. The utility of GE tests as a clinical diagnostic tool in the work-up of dyspeptic symptoms may be overrated.
Adult
;
Breath Tests
;
Caprylates
;
Dyspepsia
;
Gastric Emptying
;
Humans
;
Logistic Models
;
Prospective Studies
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
2.Ethnic Differences in Anorectal Manometry Findings in Patients With Fecal Incontinence:Results From a Multiethnic Cohort According to the London Classification
Daniel L COHEN ; Amir MARI ; Anton BERMONT ; Dana Zelnik YOVEL ; Vered RICHTER ; Haim SHIRIN
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2023;29(3):370-377
Background/Aims:
Clinical rates of fecal incontinence (FI) are known to vary based on race and ethnicity. It is unclear if anorectal manometry (ARM) findings in patients with FI differ based on ethnicity.
Methods:
High-resolution ARM studies performed between 2014-2021 due to FI at 2 hospitals with multiethnic populations were retrospectively reviewed.
Results:
Four hundred and seventy-nine subjects were included––87 (18.2%) Arab Israelis, 76 (15.9%) immigrants from the former Soviet Union, and 316 (66.0%) Jewish Israelis. Median age was 67 years old (76.0% women: 90.4% were parous). The Arab Israeli group had higher rates of smoking, diabetes, and obesity. Over 95% of ARM’s were abnormal per the London classification including 23% with “combined anal hypotension and hypocontractility,” 36% with “anal normotension with anal hypocontractility,” 67% with “dyssynergia,” and 65% with either “rectal hyposensation” or “borderline rectal hyposensation.” On univariate analyses, significant differences between the ethnic groups were noted in the rates of “anal hypotension with normal contractility,” “combined anal hypotension with anal hypocontractility,” and “dyssynergia.” In multivariate logistic regression analyses controlling for age, gender, parity, smoking, diabetes, and obesity, the Arab Israeli group remained several times more likely to have “combined anal hypotension and hypocontractibility” compared to the other groups.
Conclusions
Ethnicity impacts ARM findings in patients with FI. The reason for this is unclear and future studies on ethnically diverse populations evaluating the clinical relevance of these findings are warranted.
3.Achalasia During Pregnancy: Proposed Management Algorithm Based on a Thorough Literature Review
Sergei VOSKO ; Daniel L COHEN ; Ortal NEEMAN ; Shai MATALON ; Efrat BROIDE ; Haim SHIRIN
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2021;27(1):8-18
Fewer than 40 cases of achalasia occurring in pregnant woman have been reported in the literature. Given the rarity of achalasia during pregnancy, and the numerous treatment options that are available for achalasia in general, no guidelines exist for the management of achalasia during pregnancy. Diagnosis of new cases may be difficult as symptoms and physiological changes that occur during pregnancy may obscure the clinical presentation of achalasia. The management of achalasia in pregnancy is also challenging. Treatment decisions should be individualized for each case, considering both the welfare of the mother and the fetus.Since pregnant women suffering from achalasia represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge with complex maternal-fetal aspects to consider, we have reviewed the available literature on the subject and summarized current diagnostic and therapeutic options.Additionally, we present a management algorithm as a means to guide treatment of future cases. We recommend that a conservative approach should be adopted with bridging therapies performed until after delivery when definitive treatment of achalasia can be more safely performed.