1.In-hospital mortality and influential factors of hip arthroplasty in older adult patients
Liancheng FEI ; Haiguo PAN ; Jinlei YU
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2022;29(7):1049-1053
Objective:To analyze the in-hospital mortality and influential factors of total hip arthroplasty (THR) in older adult patients.Methods:A total of 130 older adult patients subjected to THR in Department of Orthopedics, Huzhou Linghu People's Hospital between August 2019 and August 2021 were included in this study. In-hospital mortality was calculated. These patients were divided into death and survival groups according to whether they were dead or alive. Sex, age, smoking, drinking, disease type, complications, cardiovascular disease history, operation severity score, operative time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative osteoporosis treatment and postoperative rehabilitation training were compared between the two groups. The risk factors that influence in-hospital mortality were analyzed using logistic analysis method.Results:Among 130 patients, 9 patients died in Huzhou Linghu People's Hospital, with the mortality of 6.92%. Thus, there were 9 patients in the death group and 121 patients in the survival group. There were significant differences in age, smoking, complications, operation severity score and postoperative osteoporosis treatment between the two groups ( t = 1.70, χ2 = 5.48, χ2 = 4.09, t = 2.86, χ2 = 4.03, all P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that the age (≥ 85 years old), smoking (yes), complications (≥ 3), operation severity score (≥ 15 points) were the risk factors that influence in-hospital mortality. Postoperative osteoporosis treatment was the protective factor of THR. Conclusion:The in-hospital mortality of older adult patients after THR is high. Age ≥ 85 years old, smoking, complications ≥ 3, and operation severity score ≥ 15 are the risk factors of THR and may greatly affect the prognosis. More attention should be paid to older adult patients who have these risk factors.
2.Treatment with a proximal femoral locking plate versus a proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in older adult patients
Liancheng FEI ; Haiguo PAN ; Jinlei YU
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2023;30(3):375-378
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of a proximal femoral locking plate (LPFP) versus a proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA) in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in older adult patients. Methods:A total of 130 older adult patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures who received treatment in Linghu People's Hospital of Huzhou from May 2017 to June 2020 were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to undergo treatment with either a PFNA (observation group, n = 65) or an LPFP (control group, n = 65). Intraoperative blood loss, incision length, operative time, and time to fracture healing were determined in each group. At 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, the Harris hip score was used to evaluate hip joint recovery. Coxa vara, incision infection, and internal fixation loosening were compared between the two groups. Results:Intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the control group [(189.26 ± 48.15) mL vs. (96.47 ± 40.21) mL, t = -11.93, P < 0.001]. Incision length, operative time, and time to fracture healing in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(4.03 ± 1.48) cm vs. (12.16 ± 1.55) cm, (72.13 ± 28.75) minutes vs. (120.34 ± 29.01) minutes, (9.89 ± 1.52) weeks vs. (13.63 ± 1.74) weeks, t = -30.59, -9.52, -13.05, all P < 0.001]. At 1 month after surgery, there was no significant difference in Harris hip score between the two groups ( t = 1.28, P > 0.05). At 3 and 6 months after surgery, the Harris hip score gradually increased in the control and observation groups ( F = 13.44, 8.26, both P < 0.001). At 3 and 6 months after surgery, Harris hip scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group [(85.17 ± 4.29) points vs. (79.50 ± 4.12) points, (95.30 ± 1.04) points vs. (87.69 ± 1.25) points, t = 7.69, 37.73, both P < 0.001]. The incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [1.54% (1/65) vs. 10.77% (7/65), χ2 = 4.80, P = 0.029). Conclusion:Compared with LPFP, PFNA can effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss in older adult patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures, accelerate the progress of fracture healing, promote the recovery of the hip joint, and has fewer complications. Therefore, PFNA is worthy of popularization.
3.Pathogenesis and treatment of the syndrome of periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis
International Journal of Pediatrics 2020;47(7):485-488
The syndrome of periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis (PFAPA)is the most common cause of periodic fever in childhood.The diagnosis of PFAPA is typically made on clinical grounds.The patients usually show normal growth and development.The current pharmacological treatment includes corticosteroids for the management of febrile episodes, colchicine for the prophylaxis of febrile episodes, and other medication with unproven efficacy.Tonsillectomy is an option for selected patients.Usually PFAPA syndrome resolves during adolescence, but there is increasing evidence that this condition may persist into adulthood.This article reviews the pathogenesis and treatment of PFAPA in order to raise pediatricians′ awareness of this disease.