1.Winning The War Against Covid-19 In Malaysia: An Achievable Goal?
Mohd Hafiz Jaafar ; Amirah Azzeri
Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine 2020;20(1):148-149
The World Health Organization (WHO) has initially categorised COVID-19 infection as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in late January 2020 and later on declared the outbreak as a pandemic on March 11, 2020. On February 4, 2020 the first Malaysian positive COVID-19 patients was detected. It was estimated through a thorough decision tree technique, cumulatively 22,000 positive patients were expected to be infected nationwide. At the current rate of disease detection, screening yield and clinical capacity in Malaysia, the identification of the positive patients will have to be continuously done until middle of May 2020. In addition, a prediction with the forecasted testing capacity was also conducted. In contrast with the earlier estimation, massive testing causes the number of positive patients to be saturated earlier, by the end of April 2020. Based on the projection, 346, 307 cumulative tests will be conducted with 225,100 cumulative positive cases will be identified. Of the numbers, the cumulative number of patients in care would be 17,631 with 705 cumulative number of admission to intensive care unit and 353 cumulative patients required for ventilator. The cumulative death and cumulative discharge are expected to be 394 and 6008 respectively. Currently, it is challenging for Malaysia to flatten the epidemic curve due to the constraints of healthcare resources. These challenges potentially highlight the need for realistic strategies with regard to the country’s capacity.
2.Period Poverty: A Neglected Public Health Issue
Hafiz JAAFAR ; Suraya Yasmin ISMAIL ; Amirah AZZERI
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2023;44(4):183-188
Period poverty is a global community health dilemma that has long been overlooked. This condition is described as having insufficient access to menstrual products, education, and sanitation facilities. Briefly, period poverty means that millions of women are subjected to injustice and inequity due to menstruation. This review aimed to explore the definition, challenges, and effects of period poverty on the community, especially among women at their productive ages. In addition, suggestions to minimize the impact of period poverty are discussed. A search strategy was applied using the keywords “period poverty,” “period equity,” “period poverty,” and “menstrual hygiene” in Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, MEDLINE, and PubMed electronic databases, journals, and articles on relevant topics. Trained researchers conducted a keyword search from January 2021 to June 2022. Based on the reviewed studies, it has been proven that many countries are still affected by the period stigma and taboo, inadequate exposure to menstrual health and its management, lack of education about menstruation, and shortage of access to menstrual products and facilities. The next step is to reduce and slowly eliminate the period poverty issue by conducting more research to increase clinical evidence and future references. This narrative review could inform policymakers of the magnitude of the burden related to this issue and guide them to develop effective strategies to minimize the impact of poverty, especially during the challenging years of the post-coronavirus disease 2019 era.
3.A Systematic Review on Caregiver’s Burden Among Caregivers of Dementia Patients in Malaysia
Nuurain Amirah Mohd Razi ; Halimatus Sakdiah Minhat ; Nor Afiah Mohd. Zulkefli ; Norliza Ahmad ; Tengku Amatullah Madeehah Tengku Mohd ; Hafiz Jaafar
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 2023;19(No.1):254-262
Introduction: Increasing prevalence of dementia and the associated caregiving burden are expected due to longer
life expectancy. This review aimed to critically assess dementia-driven caregiving burden and the associated factors
in Malaysia. Methods: A systematic search using several combinations of keywords was conducted in Ovid Medline, PubMed, Science Direct, ProQuest, and Ebscohost databases. The primary outcome was the score or level of
caregiver burden, while the secondary outcome was the factors associated with such burden. The quality of the
individual articles was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Results:
The systematic search resulted in seven studies being reviewed, consisting of six cross-sectional studies and one
quasi-experimental study. Using the Zarit Burden Interview, two studies reported moderate caregiver burden with
mean scores of 35.4 (15.08) and 46.0 (17.0). High levels of burden or strain were reported using the Caregiver Strain
Index in other studies. The three main associated factors with burden identified in these studies were the presence
of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), higher education level, and lack of social support.
Conclusion: Moderate to severe caregiving burden level were found to be experienced by dementia caregivers in
this country. High education, lack of support, as well as taking care of patient with BPSD being the most prominent
factors associated with burden. Therefore, burden should be regularly assessed among the dementia caregivers
especially among those with lack of social support and manage family members with BPSD, as to prevent adverse
outcome from dementia caregiving.