Short tandem repeats (STRs) are the most popular markers for human identification in forensics. These markers can be easily analyzed through a multiplex polymerase chain reaction and electrophoresis and provide high discrimination power. However, in STR analysis, several atypical phenomena can be observed such as allelic dropouts, drop-ins, or imbalance, which may be due to DNA polymerase slippage or DNA degradation effects. The observed atypical STR profiles can also provide information for mixed DNA samples or chromosomal abnormalities. In this study, we report a case of mosaicism detected in routine casework of paternity testing. Hair samples from a phenotypically normal male were tested, and the result presented a typical STR profile of a female for the amelogenin gene (XX). Through chromosome analysis using peripheral blood, it was found that 45,X/46,XY mosaicism resulted in the discrepancy between the genotype and the phenotype. In addition, the amount of Y chromosome detected was particularly low in hair compared to that in blood. This study shows that mosaicism can make interpretation difficult during STR analysis and suggests that sample types and repeated analysis should be considered even for routine STR testing.

Background: Relatives share more genomic regions than unrelated individuals, with closer relatives sharing more regions. This concept, paired with the increased availability of highthroughput single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping technologies, has made it feasible to measure the shared chromosomal regions between individuals to assess their level of relation to each other. However, such techniques have remained in the conceptual rather than practical stages in terms of applying measures or indices. Recently, we developed an index called “genetic distance-based index of chromosomal sharing (GD-ICS)” utilizing large-scale SNP data from Korean family samples and demonstrated its potential for practical applications in kinship determination. In the current study, we present validation results from various real cases demonstrating the utility of this method in resolving complex familial relationships where information obtained from traditional short tandem repeats (STRs) or lineage markers is inconclusive. Methods: We obtained large-scale SNP data through microarray analysis from Korean individuals involving 13 kinship cases and calculated GD-ICS values using the method described in our previous study. Based on the GD-ICS reference constructed for Korean families, each disputed kinship was evaluated and validated using a combination of traditional STRs and lineage markers. Results: The cases comprised those A) that were found to be inconclusive using the traditional approach, B) for which it was difficult to apply traditional testing methods, and C) that were more conclusively resolved using the GD-ICS method. This method has overcome the limitations faced by traditional STRs in kinship testing, particularly in a paternity case with STR mutational events and in confirming distant kinship where the individual of interest is unavailable for testing. It has also been demonstrated to be effective in identifying various relationships without specific presumptions and in confirming a lack of genetic relatedness between individuals. Conclusion This method has been proven effective in identifying familial relationships across diverse complex and practical scenarios. It is not only useful when traditional testing methods fail to provide conclusive results, but it also enhances the resolution of challenging kinship cases, which suggests its applicability in various types of practical casework.