This case report explores the orthodontic treatment of pediatric patients with mild skeletal malocclusion using Invisalign First®. Two cases are presented: (1) a patient with upper incisor protrusion, deep bite, and skeletal Class II malocclusion; and (2) a patient with dental crowding and skeletal Class III malocclusion. Their treatment demonstrated the efficacy of Invisalign First® in achieving arch expansion, tooth alignment, space creation for erupting teeth, and skeletal malocclusion correction. The overall results were satisfactory; however, limitations in rotational and intrusive movements, as well as skeletal improvements, were observed. Careful treatment planning, including overcorrection and patient selection, is essential for achieving optimal outcomes.

This case report explores the orthodontic treatment of pediatric patients with mild skeletal malocclusion using Invisalign First®. Two cases are presented: (1) a patient with upper incisor protrusion, deep bite, and skeletal Class II malocclusion; and (2) a patient with dental crowding and skeletal Class III malocclusion. Their treatment demonstrated the efficacy of Invisalign First® in achieving arch expansion, tooth alignment, space creation for erupting teeth, and skeletal malocclusion correction. The overall results were satisfactory; however, limitations in rotational and intrusive movements, as well as skeletal improvements, were observed. Careful treatment planning, including overcorrection and patient selection, is essential for achieving optimal outcomes.

This case report explores the orthodontic treatment of pediatric patients with mild skeletal malocclusion using Invisalign First®. Two cases are presented: (1) a patient with upper incisor protrusion, deep bite, and skeletal Class II malocclusion; and (2) a patient with dental crowding and skeletal Class III malocclusion. Their treatment demonstrated the efficacy of Invisalign First® in achieving arch expansion, tooth alignment, space creation for erupting teeth, and skeletal malocclusion correction. The overall results were satisfactory; however, limitations in rotational and intrusive movements, as well as skeletal improvements, were observed. Careful treatment planning, including overcorrection and patient selection, is essential for achieving optimal outcomes.

This study investigated the effects of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and potassium iodide (KI) treatments on the acid resistance of dentin exposed to secondary caries. Sixteen bovine dentin specimens with artificially induced caries were assigned to the following four groups: untreated negative control, untreated positive control, SDF-treated (SDF), and SDF and KI-treated (SDFKI). Multispecies cariogenic biofilms containing Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus casei, and Candida albicans were cultured on the specimens for 28 days, except for the negative control group. Specimens from the negative control group were stored in phosphate-buffered saline for that period. After a cariogenic biofilm challenge, the degree of demineralization was evaluated using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). As a result of data analysis using micro-CT, the demineralization depths of the negative control, positive control, SDF, and SDFKI groups were 149.0 ± 7 μm, 392.0 ± 11 μm, 206.0 ± 20 μm, and 230.0 ± 31 μm, respectively. The degree of demineralization was significantly reduced in the SDF and SDFKI groups compared with that in the untreated positive control group. There were no significant differences between the SDF and SDFKI groups. This study confirmed that SDF and SDFKI treatments increase the acid resistance of dentin to secondary caries. KI did not significantly affect the cariesarresting effect of the SDF.

This study compared the surface roughness and microbial adhesion characteristics of Omnichroma, a novel composite resin developed using “smart chromatic technology”, with those of two other conventional composite resins with different filler compositions. A total of 144 specimens were fabricated using 3 types of composite resins: Omnichroma (nano-spherical), Filtek Z350XT (nanofill), and Tetric N-Ceram (nanohybrid) and, divided into 3 groups of 48. Finishing was performed using tungsten carbide burs. Specimens were then divided into 3 subgroups using different polishing methods: Control, SofLex, and PoGo. Surface roughness was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively using an atomic force microscope and a scanning electron microscope. Microbial adhesion was assessed by culturing Streptococcus mutans on the specimens for 24 hours and then measuring colony-forming units attached to the upper surface. The surface roughness (Ra) of Omnichroma was 0.123 μm after finishing, and it exhibited a smooth surface compared to the other resins. However, after polishing, there were no significant differences in the surface roughness between the three composite groups, regardless of the polishing methods. The surfaces of the Control subgroups were significantly rougher than those of the SofLex subgroups in all 3 composite groups. However, except for Tetric N-Ceram, there were no significant differences between the Control and PoGo subgroups in the other composite groups. Microbial adhesion assessment showed no significant differences between any of the 3 composite resin subgroups; however, Omnichroma exhibited higher microbial adhesion than the other two composites. No significant correlation was observed between surface roughness and microbial adhesion.