Introduction: Persons with disabilities (PWD) are susceptible to malnutrition. Caregivers or teachers in rehabilitation centres may not be adequately trained in nutrition management of PWD. The aims of this study were (i) to assess the nutrition knowledge, attitude and practice among teachers in community-based rehabilitation centres for PWD; and (ii) to evaluate changes in the nutrition knowledge and attitude of the teachers before and after exposure to a training workshop on nutrition management for PWD. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a guided self-administered Nutrition Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Questionnaire on Persons with Disabilities (KAP-nOKU), among a convenience sample of 210 teachers. Forty-five of them further participated in a nutrition training workshop and completed the post-test evaluation on knowledge and attitude of the same measures. Results: At baseline, the teachers’ average knowledge, attitude and practice scores were 13.80±3.73 for knowledge (below 50th percentile); 51.49±4.08 for attitude (above 75th percentile); and 48.08±3.61 for practice (between 50th and 75th percentile). There was significant positive correlations between knowledge and attitude (r=0.343, p<0.05), as well as between attitude and practice (r=0.147, p<0.05). After exposure to a 3-day nutrition workshop, significant improvements in the teachers’ knowledge and attitude were observed, whereby teachers’ knowledge score increased from 14.20±3.80 to 25.38±2.36 and from 51.16±3.97 to 55.20±4.41 for attitude (p<0.001). Conclusion: Nutrition intervention was associated with improvement in short term knowledge and attitude of the teachers. Sustainable interventional strategies are needed to enhance the nutrition knowledge and skills of teachers of PWD.

INTRODUCTIONThe addition of glutamine to parenteral nutrition (PN) in neonates has not shown significant benefits as compared to adults thus far. This study aimed to determine the potential benefits of the addition of glutamine to neonatal PN in a tertiary hospital in a middle-income country.

METHODSThis was a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Babies who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and who required PN were eligible for inclusion in the study. The subjects were randomised to receive either glutamine-added PN (intervention) or standard PN (control). The most important outcomes included time to full enteral nutrition, incidence of sepsis and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), clinical or culture-proven sepsis.

RESULTSOut of 270 subjects, 132 were randomised to the intervention group and 138, to the control group. Baseline data were comparable in both groups. The median time taken to reach full enteral nutrition was similar for both intervention and control groups (six days in each group, p-value is 0.52). The incidences of NEC, clinical sepsis and culture-proven sepsis did not differ significantly in the intervention and control groups (5.8 vs. 7.1 percent, p-value is 0.68; 15.7 percent vs. 10.2 percent, p-value is 0.21 and 16.5 percent vs. 15.7 percent, p-value is 0.38, respectively). Other outcomes such as duration of ventilation, duration of NICU stay and a subgroup analysis for preterm and term babies also showed no statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONAddition of glutamine to neonatal PN was not shown to improve outcome.

Double-Blind Method ; Enteral Nutrition ; Female ; Glutamine ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Infant, Newborn ; Intensive Care, Neonatal ; Malaysia ; Male ; Parenteral Nutrition ; Respiratory Tract Infections ; diagnosis ; Sepsis ; microbiology ; prevention & control ; Treatment Outcome