Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of wide-focus high energy lithotriptor with narrow-focus low energy lithotriptor treating renal calculi. Methods A prospective study was conducted to compare both modalities for the management of renal calculi.Stone formers were randomly enrolled into two groups. Group A was managed with wide-focus high energy lithotriptor,while group B was managed with the other. Urine samples were collected to detect neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin(NGAL)and α1-microglobulin(α1-MG)levels before and after SWL. Results 60 were randomized to the group A and 60 to group B. There was no significant difference between two groups in stone free rate and complication rate.For stones more than 10 mm,re-treat rate(11.1%vs 39.1%,P=0.021)was lower and complication rate(25.9%vs 4.3%,P=0.038)was higher in group A. There had a larger increase of NGAL in group A(P < 0.001)after SWL. Conclusion SWL with both lithotriptors are effective and safe for renal stones.Wide-focus high energy lithotripsy was associated with lower re-treat rate and higher complication rate for stones more than 10 mm.NGAL may play a potential role in the evalua-tion of SWL induced early renal injury.