As the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Subcommittee (TDMS) of the Korean Association of Quality Assurance for Clinical Laboratories (KAQACL), we organised two trials as an external quality assessment of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and testing for drugs of abuse (DOA) in 2014. In each trial, low and high level control materials for TDM testing, and positive and negative control materials for DOA testing, were requested from institutions. The number of participating laboratories was 107 for the first trial and 106 for the second. The average number of drug items provided was 5.7 per institution. The most commonly tested substances were, in descending order, valproic acid, digoxin, tacrolimus, phenytoin, and vancomycin. The mean inter-laboratory coefficients of variation for low- and high-level TDM control materials were 8.5% and 7.2%, respectively. The most widely used TDM analysers were the Architect i System (Abbott Diagnostics, USA), followed by the Cobas Integra (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland) and the Cobas c501 analyser (Roche Diagnostics). The number of participating laboratories for DOA testing was 23% higher that than in 2013. In 96.9% of cases, our analysis confirmed the suitability of the tests at participating DOA laboratories in both trials. In the external quality assessment of TDM by the TDMS of KAQACL in 2014, the overall performance of TDM testing was found to be similar to that observed in the previous years, and inter-laboratory precision was higher than that in 2013. Continuous quality improvement of TDM testing by participation in a proficiency-testing program is necessary.
Digoxin ; Drug Monitoring* ; Korea ; Laboratory Proficiency Testing ; Phenytoin ; Quality Improvement ; Street Drugs* ; Tacrolimus ; Valproic Acid ; Vancomycin

We performed two trials on the external quality assessment for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and testing for drugs of abuse (DOA) organized by the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) subcommittee of the Korean Association of Quality Assurance for Clinical Laboratories (KAQACL) in 2013. In each trial, two levels of control material for TDM, and positive and negative control material for DOA testing, were requested from candidate institutions. The number of participating laboratories was 106 and 105 for the first and second trials, respectively. The average number of drug items was 5.6 per institution. The most commonly tested substances were valproic acid, followed by digoxin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and tacrolimus, in descending order. The mean inter-laboratory coefficients of variation for low- and high-level control materials were 9.3% and 6.7%, respectively. The most widely used TDM analysers were Architect i System (Abbott Diagnostics, USA), followed by Cobas Integra (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland) and Cobas c501 analyser (Roche Diagnostics). The number of participating laboratories for DOA testing increased by 30% compared with that in 2012. We received 100% and 98.2% correct answers from the participating DOA laboratories in each trial, respectively. In the external quality assessment for TDM by the TDM subcommittee of KAQACL in 2013, the overall performance of TDM was similar to previous years and the inter-laboratory precision was improved compared with that in 2012. Continuous quality improvement for TDM testing is needed through participation in a proficiency-testing program.
Carbamazepine ; Digoxin ; Drug Monitoring* ; Korea ; Laboratory Proficiency Testing ; Phenytoin ; Quality Improvement ; Street Drugs* ; Tacrolimus ; Valproic Acid

As an annual function of the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Subcommittee of Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service (K-EQAS), we organised two trials for an external quality assessment of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and testing for drugs of abuse (DOA) in 2015. For the TDM assessment, we sent low- and high-level control materials from various clinical institutions, and for the DOA testing, we sent positive and negative control materials. The number of participating laboratories was 105 for the TDM trial and 106 for the DOA test. The average number of drug items provided was 5.6 per institution. The most commonly tested substances, in descending order, were: valproic acid, digoxin, vancomycin, tacrolimus, and carbamazepine. The mean inter-laboratory coefficients of variation for low- and high-level TDM control materials were 7.3% and 7.4%, respectively. The most widely used TDM analysers were the Architect i System (Abbott Diagnostics, USA), followed by the Cobas Integra (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland) and the Cobas c501 analyser (Roche Diagnostics). The number of participating laboratories for the DOA analysis was 16% higher that than of our 2014 study. In 98.6% of cases, our analysis confirmed the reliabilityviability of the tests at participating DOA laboratories in both trials. In the external quality assessment of TDM by the TDM subcommittee of K-EQAS in 2015, the overall performance of TDM testing was found to be similar to that reported in previous years, and inter-laboratory precision was higher than that of 2014. Continuous improvement in the quality of TDM testing through participation in a proficiency-testing program will remain necessary in the future.
Carbamazepine ; Digoxin ; Drug Monitoring* ; Korea* ; Laboratory Proficiency Testing ; Street Drugs* ; Tacrolimus ; Valproic Acid ; Vancomycin