1.The role and molecular mechanism of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in chemoresistance to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer cells
Debing XIANG ; Hong DONG ; Jin QUAN ; Guiyin SUN ; Mengxia LI ; Dong WANG
Chongqing Medicine 2016;45(36):5045-5048
Objective To investigate the role and molecular mechanism of epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EM T ) in che‐moresistance to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer cells .Methods Oxaliplatin resistant LOVO/L‐OHP cells were established by gradu‐ally increasing the concentration of oxaliplatin and intermittent treatment with high‐dose concentration on parental cells (LOVO) . The expression of E‐cadherin and Vimentin was detected by indirect immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis .The expression of Snail and Twist was detected by Western blot analysis .cell proliferation was detected by MTT .Results Compared with LOVO cells ,the epithelial phenotype of LOVO/L‐OHP cell line was lost ,and the expression of E‐cadherin was decreased (22 .63 ± 3 .25)% (P<0 .01) ,an increase in the mesenchymal marker Vimentin (475 .42 ± 58 .36)% (P< 0 .01) .LOVO/L‐OHP cell line Twist expression was slightly increased (116 .42 ± 18 .36)% (P> 0 .05) ,Snail expression was significantly increased (382 .18 ± 41 .33)% (P<0 .01) .The expression of siSnail increased E‐cadherin (246 .82 ± 31 .57)% (P<0 .01) .The expression of Vimentin (28 .75 ± 3 .96)% (P< 0 .01);siSnail significantly enhanced sensitivity to oxaliplatin based chemotherapy in LOVO/L‐OHP cell line ,IC50 control group and siSnail group were 23 .75 μg/mL and 12 .42 μg/mL .Conclusion EM T may play an important role in chemoresistance to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer cells ,inhibition of EM T can restore chemosensitivity of resistant colorectal cancer cells.
2.Open hepatectomy versus laparoscopic in the treatment of primary left-sided hepatolithiasis: a propensity, long-term follow-up analysis at a single center
Shubo PAN ; Chunli WU ; Hui HOU ; Dachen ZHOU ; Xiao CUI ; Liang HE ; Jiong GU ; Lei WANG ; Zongfan YU ; Guiyin DONG ; Shengxue XIE ; Qiru XIONG ; Xiaoping GENG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2020;58(7):530-538
Methods:Clinical data of 187 patients with left-sided hepatolithiasis and underwent laparoscopically or open left-sided hepatectomy from October 2014 to October 2019 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were retrospectively analyzed in this propensity score matching (PSM) study and were matched in terms of age, sex, body mass index, liver function, ASA score, comorbidities, history of biliary surgery, and smoking history on the ratio of 1∶1.There were 47 cases in each group and the mean age were (54.7±12.3)years old(range:34 to 75 years old) and (53.2±12.6) years old (range: 34 to 75 years old) in open and laparoscopically group respectively. The data of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital-stay, complication rate, biliary fistula rate, stone clearance rate, and stone recurrence rate were compared. The quantitative data were compared using t-test or rank-sum test. Count data were analyzed with χ 2 test or Fisher test. Results:No significant difference was observed in the clinical characteristics of included 94 patients in this study(all P>0.05).The length of the postoperative hospital-stay after OLH was significantly higher than that in the LLH group((10.8±3.1) days vs.(8.5±2.2)days, t=4.085, P=0.000). LLR significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative biliary fistula compared with the OLH (6.3% vs.21.2%, χ 2=4.374, P=0.036) and the rates of postoperative complications in the OLH group was significantly higher than that in the LLH group (48.9% vs.27.6%, χ 2=4.502, P=0.034). Moreover, the stone recurrence rates in the LLH group was significantly lower than that after OLR (4.2% vs. 17.0%, χ 2=4.029, P=0.045). OLH (95 % CI: 1.55 to 10.75, P=0.004) and postoperative complications (95 % CI: 1.29 to 9.52, P=0.013) were independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay. OLH (95 % CI: 1.428 to 44.080, P=0.018) and residual stones (95 % CI: 1.580 to 62.379, P=0.014) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative biliary fistula. Biliary fistula (95 % CI: 1.078 to 24.517, P=0.040) was an independent risk factor for the recurrence of stones. Conclusion:Compared with OLH, LLH is safe and effective for the treatment of the primary left-sided hepatolithiasis with the clinical benefits of shorter hospital stay, fewer morbidity and biliary fistula occurrence, and lower stone recurrence rates.
3.Open hepatectomy versus laparoscopic in the treatment of primary left-sided hepatolithiasis: a propensity, long-term follow-up analysis at a single center
Shubo PAN ; Chunli WU ; Hui HOU ; Dachen ZHOU ; Xiao CUI ; Liang HE ; Jiong GU ; Lei WANG ; Zongfan YU ; Guiyin DONG ; Shengxue XIE ; Qiru XIONG ; Xiaoping GENG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2020;58(7):530-538
Methods:Clinical data of 187 patients with left-sided hepatolithiasis and underwent laparoscopically or open left-sided hepatectomy from October 2014 to October 2019 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were retrospectively analyzed in this propensity score matching (PSM) study and were matched in terms of age, sex, body mass index, liver function, ASA score, comorbidities, history of biliary surgery, and smoking history on the ratio of 1∶1.There were 47 cases in each group and the mean age were (54.7±12.3)years old(range:34 to 75 years old) and (53.2±12.6) years old (range: 34 to 75 years old) in open and laparoscopically group respectively. The data of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital-stay, complication rate, biliary fistula rate, stone clearance rate, and stone recurrence rate were compared. The quantitative data were compared using t-test or rank-sum test. Count data were analyzed with χ 2 test or Fisher test. Results:No significant difference was observed in the clinical characteristics of included 94 patients in this study(all P>0.05).The length of the postoperative hospital-stay after OLH was significantly higher than that in the LLH group((10.8±3.1) days vs.(8.5±2.2)days, t=4.085, P=0.000). LLR significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative biliary fistula compared with the OLH (6.3% vs.21.2%, χ 2=4.374, P=0.036) and the rates of postoperative complications in the OLH group was significantly higher than that in the LLH group (48.9% vs.27.6%, χ 2=4.502, P=0.034). Moreover, the stone recurrence rates in the LLH group was significantly lower than that after OLR (4.2% vs. 17.0%, χ 2=4.029, P=0.045). OLH (95 % CI: 1.55 to 10.75, P=0.004) and postoperative complications (95 % CI: 1.29 to 9.52, P=0.013) were independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay. OLH (95 % CI: 1.428 to 44.080, P=0.018) and residual stones (95 % CI: 1.580 to 62.379, P=0.014) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative biliary fistula. Biliary fistula (95 % CI: 1.078 to 24.517, P=0.040) was an independent risk factor for the recurrence of stones. Conclusion:Compared with OLH, LLH is safe and effective for the treatment of the primary left-sided hepatolithiasis with the clinical benefits of shorter hospital stay, fewer morbidity and biliary fistula occurrence, and lower stone recurrence rates.