INTRODUCTION: Medical students rely on patients and their families as teachers during the learning journey. However, ill patients and their families may not welcome having students participating in their care, and anecdotal instances of abuse against clinical medical students are not uncommon. We aimed to determine the prevalence of medical student mistreatment by patients and their families and describe students' self-reported responses to such incidents. METHODS: An email link to an anonymised electronic survey form was sent to all clinical students (n = 184) at a Singapore medical school. The first part of the survey sought information on whether the student had previous experiences of mistreatment by patients and their families. If so, the frequency of mistreatment, circumstances when mistreatment happened and students' reactions were collected. In the second part, the students were asked if they knew how to handle such mistreatment incidents. RESULTS: There were a total of 91 respondents, 14.3% of whom had experienced mistreatment by patients and their families in our institution. One-third of the affected students felt fearful or humiliated. However, the majority chose to be passive by saying nothing or moving away. Less than half of the students knew how to handle such incidents or where to seek help. CONCLUSION Incidents of mistreatment in our school are not uncommon. Our study revealed a need for more clarity and guidance about how students can manage such situations. This is an important topic because such mistreatment is known to inflict emotional disturbance in students. We proposed a workflow to help students deal with mistreatment.

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of linked color imaging (LCI) technology on Helicobacter pylori (HP)-related gastritis. Methods Forty patients who were diagnosed as chronic gastritis using blue laser imaging endoscopy in Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University during November 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled in this study. The appearance of gastric mucosa was observed using conventional white light imaging and LCI. Biopsies were taken under white light imaging according to biopsy pathological diagnosis consensus, and the ones from abnormal reddening area were taken under LCI. 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT) was performed in all 40 patients. The consistency between the two observation methods and final pathological diagnosis was evaluated using Kappa test, and the diagnostic consistency of the two methods was compared using Mc Nemar paired Chi-square test.Results The positive predictive value of white light imaging and LCI for prediction of HP infection was 54. 5%(6/11) and 81. 5%(22/27), respectively.The consistency between white light imaging diagnosis and final pathological diagnosis was 0. 475 (19/40), Kappa＝0. 635; the consistency between LCI diagnosis and final pathological diagnosis was 0. 875 (35/40), Kappa＝0. 741. Mc Nemar paired Chi-square test showed that the consistency between the two methods had significant difference (P＜0. 01). 13C-UBT showed that 19 patients were positive and 21 negative. Among the 19 positive patients, 1 case was diagnosed as HP negative by pathology under LCI; and among the 21 negative patients, 4 cases were diagnosed as HP negative by pathology under LCI.The consistency between pathological diagnosis and 13C-UBT was good (Kappa＝0. 751). The red-white boundary and diffuse redness of gastric mucosa were observed in 15 and 11 cases under LCI, respectively, while unobserved under white light imaging.The Wilcoxon signed ranks test showed that there was a significant difference between white light imaging and LCI on the appearance of gastric mucosa (Z＝－4. 455, P＜0. 01). Conclusion LCI is more useful for diagnosis of HP-related chronic gastritis than white light imaging.

Pharmacy active consultation refers to the spontaneous activity that clinical pharmacists take the initiative to go to clinical departments to help doctors solve problems related to drug use in clinical practice ，put forward drug treatment suggestions or provide pharmaceutical services ，and form medical documents . The difference between pharmacy active consultation and pharmacy consultation is that the latter is generally proposed by the clinician ，who sends a consultation invitation to the pharmacy department in the hospital information system ，and the clinical pharmacist will go to the consultation after receiving it ，while the former is a pharmaceutical service mode that the clinical pharmacist takes the initiative to carry out in the clinical department . On the basis of routine pharmacy active consultation ，clinical pharmacists in our hospital also further carried out a special active consultation mode （including prompt special active consultation for patients with multidrug resistance bacteria positive ，active monitoring and intervention for patients with drug -induced liver injury ），and patient pharmaceutical supervision in the form of return visit of pharmacy active consultation . Pharmacy active consultation and its special active consultation possess the characteristics of initiative ， early and extensive coverage ，as a supplement to resident clinical pharmacy services . Pharmacy active consultation could help the pharmacy department to improve service efficiency ，provide a new perspective for medical institutions to carry out efficient pharmaceutical services ，and supply new ideas for the reform of pharmaceutical services in China .