Objective To compare and explore the curative effects of elective operation and emergency operation in treating atlantoaxial vertebral segmental spinal canal space-occupying lesions.Methods Thirty-two patients suffering from atlanto-axial vertebral segmental spinal canal space-occupying lesions treated in our hospital from May 2010 to April 2015 were selected and divided into the emergency operation group (group A,n =14) and elective operation group (group B,n =18).The emergency and elective operations were adopted respectively.Then the operation time,intraoperative blood loss,JOA score,ODI index,VAS score,postoperative imaging(MRI) and effect satisfaction degree were compared between the two groups.Results After treatment,the JOA score in the group A was (25.23±4.47) points,which was higher than (22.10±3.56) points in the group B,and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.67,P＜0.05).The ODI index and VAS score of the two groups all were decreased.The ODI index in the group A was (18.56±3.10) points,which in the group B was (21.56±4.37) points,and there was statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=3.76,P＜0.05).The VAS score in the group A was (1.89 ±-0.53)points,which in the group B was (3.16±0.89)points,the difference was statistically significant between the two groups (t=3.76,P＜0.05).Before surgery and at postoperative 1 month,the spinal cord function classification(Frankel grade) of the two groups had no statistically significant difference between the two groups(Z=-0.18,P=0.85＞0.05,Z=-0.52,P=0.60＞0.05).The operation time had no statistical difference between the group A and B[(120.23±9.02)min vs.(126.25±12.12)min,P＞0.05].The intraoperative bleeding volume had had no statistical difference between the group A and B [(211.26±12.25)mL vs.(220.43±17.58)mL,P＞ 0.05].After one month of treatment,the satisfaction degree in the group A was 92.56 ％,which was higher than 72.22％ in the group B,and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-2.13,P＜0.05).Conclusion Emergency operation in treating atlantoaxial segment spinal space occupying lesions can effectively improve the therapeutic effect,and has higher patients satisfaction after treatment.Therefore which is worth promoting and applying.

BACKGROUND: The choice of suitable bone graft substitute is vital for spinal fusion treatment, which can solve some limitations caused by autogenous bone graft and other materials. OBJECTIVE: To investigate properties of different bone graft fusion materials, and to explore their application in dog spinal fusion of lumbar vertebral body. METHODS: Forty-five Chinese rural dogs were enrol ed to prepare lumbar interbody fusion models, and then were randomized into three groups transplanted with autogenous ilium, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 composite or al ograft ilium, respectively. Afterwards, effects of different materials in the lumbar interbody fusion were analyzed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The fusion rate of the composite group was significantly higher than those of the other groups (P < 0.05). Oswestry dysfunction index of the composite group was significantly lower than those of the other groups after surgery (P < 0.05). Hematoxylin-eosin staining showed that dogs achieved complete bony fusion, continuous bone trabecula gradual y formed, and there was no gap between the transplanted bone and the bone surface in the composite group compared with the other groups at 12 weeks after surgery. These results demonstrate that recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 composites can significantly promote the spinal fusion superior to autologous and al ogeneic bone grafts.