1.Understanding of International Sleeve Gastroectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement and our experience.
Cheng-zhu ZHENG ; Guang-zuan ZHUO
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2012;15(11):1099-1101
An international symposium on the standard surgical treatment of morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus was held in Florida, USA in March 2011. An expert panel from all over the world attended the meeting. The expert panelists discussed and established International Sleeve Gastroectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement : best practice guidelines based on experience of more than 12,000 cases, which made a very commendable attempt in standardized surgical pathway of sleeve gastroectomy. Based on clinical experience over 10 years and the understanding of the consensus , this paper discusses the learning curve, preoperative preparation, indications/contraindications, surgical technique, management and prevention of complications, and post operative management.
Consensus Development Conferences as Topic
;
Gastrectomy
;
methods
;
Humans
;
Obesity, Morbid
;
surgery
;
Practice Guidelines as Topic
2.Efficacy comparison between 2 methods of laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Xiang GUO ; Kai YIN ; Guang-zuan ZHUO ; Xu-sheng CHANG ; Dan DING ; Cheng-zhu ZHENG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2012;15(11):1125-1128
OBJECTIVETo investigate the outcomes after 2 methods of laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).
METHODSFrom December 2009 to June 2011, 21 patients with T2DM underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery, including laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB, n=11), and laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB, n=10). Clinical data were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTSThe clinical complete remission rate of T2DM was 64%(7/11) in LRYGB group, and 60%(6/10) in LMGB group. The clinical partial remission rate of T2DM was 36%(4/11) in LRYGB group, and 40%(4/10) in the LMGB group. There was no significant difference between the two groups(both P>0.05). The levels of BMI, waist circumference, HOMA-IR and HbA1c within the postoperative 6 months were improved in each group (all P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups(all P>0.05). There were no conversion or perioperative deaths in both groups. Compared to LMGB, the LRYGB group had longer operative time[(147.0±35.9) min vs. (110.5±39.7) min, P=0.038] and postoperative hospital stay [(8.9±2.3) d vs. (7.1±1.4) d, P=0.046). One patient suffered from ileus in LRYGB group, one patient suffered from reflux esophagitis and one suffered chronic diarrhea in LMGB group. The incidence of postoperative complication was similar between the two groups(P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONLRYGB and LMGB may result in satisfactory and safe effects for the treatment of T2DM, while the LMGB is simpler and associates with quicker recovery.
Adult ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; surgery ; Female ; Gastric Bypass ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome
3.Perioperative managment of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
Xu-sheng CHANG ; Kai YIN ; Xin WANG ; Guang-zuan ZHUO ; Dan DING ; Xiang GUO ; Cheng-zhu ZHENG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2013;16(10):993-996
OBJECTIVETo summarize the surgical technique and perioperative management of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).
METHODSA total of 57 morbid obesity patients undergoing LSG surgery from May 2010 to December 2012 were enrolled in the study, whose clinical data in perioperative period were analyzed retrospectively. These patients had more than 1 year of follow-up. All the patients received preoperative preparation and postoperative management, and postoperative excess weight loss(EWL%) and improvement of preoperative complications was evaluated.
RESULTSAll the cases completed the operation under laparoscopy, except 1 case because of the abdominal extensive adhesion. The average operation time was(102.0±15.2) min and the mean intraoperative blood loss (132.3±45.6) ml. Of 2 postoperative hemorrhage patients, 1 case received conservative treatment, and another one underwent laparoscopic exploration. The EWL% at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after procedure was (54.9±13.8)%, (79.0±23.6)% and (106.9±25.1)% respectively. The preoperative complications were improved in some degree. There were no operative death, and anastomotic leak, anastomotic stenosis, or surgical site infection occurred.
CONCLUSIONLSG is a safe and effective surgical technique, whose safety and efficacy may be increased by improving the perioperative management.
Gastrectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Obesity, Morbid ; Retrospective Studies ; Weight Loss