Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) (FFRCT) for functional myocardial ischemia.Methods Thirty-nine patients undergone coronary CTA and FFR examination from Aug.2012 to Jul.2015 in PLA General Hospital were retrospectively included in present study.Measurements of invasive FFR value was used as reference standard,and FFRCT based on coronary CTA image was performed in either per-patient or per-vessel level to assess the accuracy,specificity,sensitivity,the positive predictive value and negative predictive value for functional myocardial ischemia.Results In per-patient level,the accuracy of FFRCT was 82.05％,sensitivity was 83.33％,specificity was 80.95％,positive predictive value was 78.95％ and negative predictive value was 85.00％.In per-vessel level,the accuracy of FFRCT was 76.79％,sensitivity was 69.57％,specificity was 81.82％,positive predictive value was 72.73％ and negative predictive value was 79.41％.The area under ROC was 0.826 in per-patient level,and 0.786 in per-vessel level.For per-vessel,FFRCT was positively correlated with FFR value significantly (r=0.644;95％CI:0.458-0.775).Conclusion With FFR as reference standard,domestic noninvasive FFRCT can be used for the diagnosis of functional myocardial ischemia with high diagnostic performance and clinical application prospect.

BACKGROUND: Imprecise interpretation of coronary angiograms was reported and resulted in inappropriate revascularization. Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score is a comprehensive system to evaluate the complexity of the overall lesions. We hypothesized that a real-time SYNTAX score feedback from image analysts may rectify the mis-estimation and improve revascularization appropriateness in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: In this single-center, historical control study, patients with stable CAD with coronary lesion stenosis ≥50% were consecutively recruited. During the control period, SYNTAX scores were calculated by treating cardiologists. During the intervention period, SYNTAX scores were calculated by image analysts immediately after coronary angiography and were provided to cardiologists in real-time to aid decision-making. The primary outcome was revascularization deemed inappropriate by Chinese appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 3245 patients were enrolled and assigned to the control group (08/2016-03/2017, n = 1525) or the intervention group (03/2017-09/2017, n = 1720). For SYNTAX score tertiles, 17.9% patients were overestimated and 4.3% were underestimated by cardiologists in the control group. After adjustment, inappropriate revascularization significantly decreased in the intervention group compared with the control group (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.95; P = 0.007). Both inappropriate percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74-0.92; P < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention utilization (adjusted OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79-0.98; P = 0.016) decreased significantly in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in 1-year adverse cardiac events between the control group and the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time SYNTAX score feedback significantly reduced inappropriate coronary revascularization in stable patients with CAD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Nos. NCT03068858 and NCT02880605; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.