1.Internet search analytics for shoulder arthroplasty: what questions are patients asking?
Johnathon R. MCCORMICK ; Matthew C. KRUCHTEN ; Nabil MEHTA ; Dhanur DAMODAR ; Nolan S. HORNER ; Kyle D. CAREY ; Gregory P. NICHOLSON ; Nikhil N. VERMA ; Grant E. GARRIGUES
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2023;26(1):55-63
Background:
Common questions about shoulder arthroplasty (SA) searched online by patients and the quality of this content are unknown. The purpose of this study is to uncover questions SA patients search online and determine types and quality of webpages encountered.
Methods:
The “People also ask” section of Google Search was queried to return 900 questions and associated webpages for general, anatomic, and reverse SA. Questions and webpages were categorized using the Rothwell classification of questions and assessed for quality using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria.
Results:
According to Rothwell classification, the composition of questions was fact (54.0%), value (24.7%), and policy (21.3%). The most common webpage categories were medical practice (24.6%), academic (23.2%), and medical information sites (14.4%). Journal articles represented 8.9% of results. The average JAMA score for all webpages was 1.69. Journals had the highest average JAMA score (3.91), while medical practice sites had the lowest (0.89). The most common question was, “How long does it take to recover from shoulder replacement?”
Conclusions
The most common questions SA patients ask online involve specific postoperative activities and the timeline of recovery. Most information is from low-quality, non-peer-reviewed websites, highlighting the need for improvement in online resources. By understanding the questions patients are asking online, surgeons can tailor preoperative education to common patient concerns and improve postoperative outcomes.
2.Rotator cuff repair: what questions are patients asking online and where are they getting their answers?
Alexander J. HODAKOWSKI ; Johnathon R. MCCORMICK ; Dhanur DAMODAR ; Matthew R. COHN ; Kyle D. CAREY ; Nikhil N. VERMA ; Gregory NICHOLSON ; Grant E GARRIGUES
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2023;26(1):25-31
Background:
This study analyzed questions entered online by rotator cuff patients and determined types and quality of websites providing information at the top of queries.
Methods:
Three strings related to rotator cuff repair were explored in Google Search. The result pages were manually collected under the “People also ask” function for frequent questions and associated webpages. Questions were categorized using Rothwell’s classification with further topical subcategorization. Webpages were evaluated by Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria for source quality.
Results:
One hundred twenty “People also ask” questions were collected with their associated webpages. Based on the Rothwell classification of questions, queries were thematically organized into fact (41.7%), value (31.7%), and policy (26.7%) categories. The most common webpage categories were academic (28.3%) and medical practice (27.5%). The most common question subcategories were timeline of recovery (21.7%), indications/management (21.7%), and pain (18.3%). The average JAMA score for all 120 webpages was 1.50. Journal articles had the highest average JAMA score (3.77), while commercial websites had the lowest JAMA score (0.91). The most common suggested question for rotator cuff repair/surgery was, “Is rotator cuff surgery worth having?,” while the most common suggested question for rotator cuff repair pain was, “What happens if a rotator cuff is not repaired?”
Conclusions
The most common questions asked on Google pertaining to rotator cuff repair evaluate management options and relate to the timeline of recovery and pain management. Most information is provided by medical practice, academic, and medical information websites, which have highly variable reliability. By understanding the questions that rotator cuff repair patients are asking online, surgeons can tailor preoperative education to common patient concerns and improve postoperative outcomes.Level of evidence: IV.