1.Learning curves for three specific procedures by anesthesiology residents using the learning curve cumulative sum (LC-CUSUM) test.
Gregoire WEIL ; Cyrus MOTAMED ; David J BIAU ; Marie Laurence GUYE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2017;70(2):196-202
BACKGROUND: The learning curve cumulative sum (LC-CUSUM) test is an innovative tool that allows quantitative monitoring of individual medical performance during the learning process by determining when a predefined acceptable level of performance is reached. This study used the LC-CUSUM test to monitor the learning process and failure rate of anesthesia residents training for specific subspecialty anesthesia procedures. METHODS: The study included 490 tracheal punctures (TP) for jet ventilation, 340 thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) procedures, and 246 fiberoptic nasal intubations (FONI) performed by 18 residents during their single 6-month rotation. RESULTS: Overall, 27 (14–52), 19 (5–41), and 14 (6–33) TP, TEA, and FONI procedures were performed, respectively, by each resident. In total, 2 of 18 residents achieved an acceptable failure rate for TEA according to the literature and 4 of 18 achieved an acceptable failure rate for FONI, while none of the residents attained an acceptable rate for TP. CONCLUSIONS: A single 6-month rotation in a reference teaching center may not be sufficient to train residents to perform specific or sub-specialty procedures as required. A regional learning network may be useful. More patient-based data are necessary to conduct a risk adjustment analysis for such specific procedures.
Analgesia, Epidural
;
Anesthesia
;
Anesthesiology*
;
Intubation
;
Learning Curve*
;
Learning*
;
Punctures
;
Risk Adjustment
;
Tea
;
Ventilation
2.Learning curves for three specific procedures by anesthesiology residents using the learning curve cumulative sum (LC-CUSUM) test.
Gregoire WEIL ; Cyrus MOTAMED ; David J BIAU ; Marie Laurence GUYE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2017;70(2):196-202
BACKGROUND: The learning curve cumulative sum (LC-CUSUM) test is an innovative tool that allows quantitative monitoring of individual medical performance during the learning process by determining when a predefined acceptable level of performance is reached. This study used the LC-CUSUM test to monitor the learning process and failure rate of anesthesia residents training for specific subspecialty anesthesia procedures. METHODS: The study included 490 tracheal punctures (TP) for jet ventilation, 340 thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) procedures, and 246 fiberoptic nasal intubations (FONI) performed by 18 residents during their single 6-month rotation. RESULTS: Overall, 27 (14–52), 19 (5–41), and 14 (6–33) TP, TEA, and FONI procedures were performed, respectively, by each resident. In total, 2 of 18 residents achieved an acceptable failure rate for TEA according to the literature and 4 of 18 achieved an acceptable failure rate for FONI, while none of the residents attained an acceptable rate for TP. CONCLUSIONS: A single 6-month rotation in a reference teaching center may not be sufficient to train residents to perform specific or sub-specialty procedures as required. A regional learning network may be useful. More patient-based data are necessary to conduct a risk adjustment analysis for such specific procedures.
Analgesia, Epidural
;
Anesthesia
;
Anesthesiology*
;
Intubation
;
Learning Curve*
;
Learning*
;
Punctures
;
Risk Adjustment
;
Tea
;
Ventilation