1.Diurnal Intraocular Pressure with Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination versus Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination in Healthy Subjects.
Seong Hee SHIM ; Joon Mo KIM ; Chul Young CHOI ; Chan Yun KIM
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2014;28(1):39-48
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of a bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) and a latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC) on diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) and anterior ocular parameters in healthy subjects. METHODS: We enrolled 58 healthy subjects in this prospective clinical study. Thirty subjects were treated with BTFC and 28 subjects were treated with LTFC. IOP was measured every 2 hours except from 01:00 and 05:00. Axial length, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber depth were obtained using the IOL master at baseline and 24 hours later. Adverse events were assessed by patient interview and by slit lamp examination. RESULTS: The largest difference in IOP between treated and untreated eyes 8 hours after instillation was 1.67 mmHg in the BTFC group (p < 0.001). The largest difference in IOP between treated and untreated eyes 10 hours after instillation was 1.93 mmHg in the LTFC group (p < 0.001). For anterior ocular parameters such as axial length, corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth at baseline and 24 hours after instillation, there were no significant differences between the baseline and 24-hour values in either the BTFC or LTFC group. The most frequently occurring adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia, which was found in 33.3% (n = 10) of the BTFC group and 25.0% (n = 7) of the LTFC group (p = 0.486). CONCLUSIONS: BTFC and LTFC provided a significant reduction in IOP from baseline without changing any anterior ocular parameters. Our results provide a reference for monocular trials to assess the effect of eye drops in a clinical condition.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Amides/*administration & dosage
;
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage
;
Circadian Rhythm/*physiology
;
Cloprostenol/administration & dosage/*analogs & derivatives
;
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy/*physiopathology
;
Healthy Volunteers
;
Humans
;
Intraocular Pressure/drug effects/*physiology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Ophthalmic Solutions
;
Prospective Studies
;
Prostaglandins F, Synthetic/*administration & dosage
;
Timolol/*administration & dosage
;
Tonometry, Ocular
;
Treatment Outcome
2.Diurnal Intraocular Pressure with Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination versus Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination in Healthy Subjects.
Seong Hee SHIM ; Joon Mo KIM ; Chul Young CHOI ; Chan Yun KIM
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2014;28(1):39-48
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of a bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) and a latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC) on diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) and anterior ocular parameters in healthy subjects. METHODS: We enrolled 58 healthy subjects in this prospective clinical study. Thirty subjects were treated with BTFC and 28 subjects were treated with LTFC. IOP was measured every 2 hours except from 01:00 and 05:00. Axial length, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber depth were obtained using the IOL master at baseline and 24 hours later. Adverse events were assessed by patient interview and by slit lamp examination. RESULTS: The largest difference in IOP between treated and untreated eyes 8 hours after instillation was 1.67 mmHg in the BTFC group (p < 0.001). The largest difference in IOP between treated and untreated eyes 10 hours after instillation was 1.93 mmHg in the LTFC group (p < 0.001). For anterior ocular parameters such as axial length, corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth at baseline and 24 hours after instillation, there were no significant differences between the baseline and 24-hour values in either the BTFC or LTFC group. The most frequently occurring adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia, which was found in 33.3% (n = 10) of the BTFC group and 25.0% (n = 7) of the LTFC group (p = 0.486). CONCLUSIONS: BTFC and LTFC provided a significant reduction in IOP from baseline without changing any anterior ocular parameters. Our results provide a reference for monocular trials to assess the effect of eye drops in a clinical condition.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Amides/*administration & dosage
;
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage
;
Circadian Rhythm/*physiology
;
Cloprostenol/administration & dosage/*analogs & derivatives
;
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy/*physiopathology
;
Healthy Volunteers
;
Humans
;
Intraocular Pressure/drug effects/*physiology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Ophthalmic Solutions
;
Prospective Studies
;
Prostaglandins F, Synthetic/*administration & dosage
;
Timolol/*administration & dosage
;
Tonometry, Ocular
;
Treatment Outcome
3.The Effect of Latanoprost on Intraocular Pressure during 12 Months of Treatment for Normal-tension Glaucoma.
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;19(4):297-301
PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) -lowering efficacy of latanoprost in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). METHODS: One-hundred and seventeen eyes of 63 NTG patients treated with 0.005% latanoprost once a day were enrolled in this study. Of these, 85 eyes of 47 patients were treated for 12 months. Mean IOPs were analyzed, and the mean IOP reductions from the untreated baseline were assessed after two weeks and after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: The mean untreated baseline IOP was 15.0+/-2.7 mmHg. After two weeks of latanoprost treatment, the mean IOP reduction from the baseline value was 2.6+/-0.2 mmHg (17.3%, p< 0.05), and after 6 and 12 months, the reduction was 2.4+/-0.2 mmHg (16.0%, p< 0.05) and 2.4+/-0.2 mmHg (16.0%, p< 0.05), respectively. Patients with a baseline IOP of > or=15 mmHg achieved significantly higher IOP reductions than those with a baseline IOP of < 15 mmHg at all follow-ups (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost was found to be well tolerated and to significantly reduce IOP in NTG patients.
Treatment Outcome
;
Time Factors
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Prostaglandins F, Synthetic/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use
;
Middle Aged
;
Male
;
Intraocular Pressure/*drug effects/physiology
;
Humans
;
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/*drug therapy/physiopathology
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Female
;
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
;
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Aged
;
Adult
4.Comparing the Efficacy of Latanoprost (0.005%), Bimatoprost (0.03%), Travoprost (0.004%), and Timolol (0.5%) in the Treatment of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.
Deepak MISHRA ; Bibhuti Prassan SINHA ; Mahendra Singh KUMAR
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2014;28(5):399-407
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost and timolol in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted at a tertiary-care centre. One hundred and forty patients with newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma were randomly assigned to treatment with latanoprost (0.005%), bimatoprost (0.03%), travoprost (0.004%) or timolol gel (0.5%); 35 patients were assigned to each group. All patients were followed for 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The main outcome measure studied was the change in IOP at week 12 from the baseline values. Safety measures included recording of adverse events. RESULTS: The mean IOP reduction from baseline at week 12 was significantly more with bimatoprost (8.8 mmHg, 35.9%) than with latanoprost (7.3 mmHg, 29.9%), travoprost (7.6 mmHg, 30.8%) or timolol (6.7 mmHg, 26.6%) (ANOVA and Student's t-tests, p < 0.001). Among the prostaglandins studied, bimatoprost produced a maximum reduction in IOP (-2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.25 to -3.18) followed by travoprost (-1.27; 95% CI, -0.81 to -1.27) and latanoprost (-1.25; 95% CI, -0.79 to -1.71); these values were significant when compared to timolol at week 12 (Bonferroni test, p < 0.001). Latanoprost and travoprost were comparable in their ability to reduce IOP at each patient visit. Ocular adverse-events were found in almost equal proportion in patients treated with bimatoprost (41.3%) and travoprost (41.9%), with a higher incidence of conjunctival hyperemia (24.1%) seen in the bimatoprost group. Timolol produced a significant drop in heart rate (p < 0.001) at week 12 when compared to the baseline measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Bimatoprost showed greater efficacy when compared to the other prostaglandins, and timolol was the most efficacious at lowering the IOP. Conjunctional hyperemia was mainly seen with bimatoprost. However, the drug was tolerated well and found to be safe.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use
;
Bimatoprost/adverse effects/therapeutic use
;
Blood Pressure/drug effects
;
Female
;
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/*drug therapy/physiopathology
;
Heart Rate/drug effects
;
Humans
;
Intraocular Pressure/drug effects
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Prostaglandins F, Synthetic/adverse effects/therapeutic use
;
Timolol/adverse effects/therapeutic use
;
Tonometry, Ocular
;
Travoprost/adverse effects/therapeutic use
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Visual Acuity/drug effects
;
Visual Field Tests
;
Visual Fields/drug effects