1.Does Leaders' Health (and Work-Related Experiences) Affect their Evaluation of Followers' Stress?.
Gabriele GIORGI ; Serena MANCUSO ; Francisco JAVIER FIZ PEREZ ; Francesco MONTANI ; Francois COURCY ; Giulio ARCANGELI
Safety and Health at Work 2015;6(3):249-255
BACKGROUND: Stressed workers suffer from severe health problems which appear to have increased. Poor leadership is especially considered a source of stress. Indeed, supervisors might perceive their subordinates to be similar to them as far as stress is concerned and this might more widespread in organizations than previously thought. METHODS: The present research investigates the relationships between leaders' health, in terms of work-related stress, mental health, and workplace bullying and their evaluation of subordinates' stress. Five regression models were formulated to test our hypothesis. This is a cross-sectional study among 261 Italian leaders, using supervisor self-assessment and leaders' assessments of their subordinates. RESULTS: Leaders' health was related to their evaluation of staff stress. Job demand, lack of job control, and lack of support by colleagues and supervisors evaluated in their subordinates were particularly associated with the leaders' own health. CONCLUSION: Implications for developing healthy leaders are finally discussed.
Bullying
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Leadership
;
Mental Health
;
Self-Assessment
2.An Integrated Air Monitoring Approach for Assessment of Formaldehyde in the Workplace.
Stefano DUGHERI ; Alessandro BONARI ; Ilenia POMPILIO ; Marco COLPO ; Nicola MUCCI ; Giulio ARCANGELI
Safety and Health at Work 2018;9(4):479-485
The aim of this study is to validate an integrated air monitoring approach for assessing airborne formaldehyde (FA) in the workplace. An active sampling by silica gel impregnated with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, a passive solid phase microextraction technique using O-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine as on-fiber derivatization reagent, an electrochemical direct-reading monitor, and an enzyme-based badge were evaluated and tested over a range of 0.020–5.12 ppm, using dynamically generated FA air concentrations. Simple linear regression analysis showed the four methods were suitable for evaluating airborne FA. Personal and area samplings in 12 anatomy pathology departments showed that the international occupational exposure limits in the GESTIS database were frequently exceeded. This monitoring approach would allow a fast, easy-to-use, and economical evaluation of both current work practices and eventual changes made to reduce FA vapor concentrations.
Chromatography
;
Formaldehyde*
;
Humans
;
Linear Models
;
Occupational Exposure
;
Pathology
;
Silica Gel
;
Solid Phase Microextraction